Re: [LegacyUG] How to suppress Source and Research notes from reports? - solved

2007-09-17 Thread BrannenGA
Thanks for the reply. I had checked those already. What I didn't see is that you have to save your changes to the book report each time. I was assuming that the default was to over-write, similar to how it is done when entering data into the family records. No such luck.

[LegacyUG] How to suppress Source and Research notes from reports?

2007-09-16 Thread BrannenGA
I don't want to include these items in the Descendant Book Report. Is this possible? I've left the associate boxes unchecked in every report option menu I could find, but the info keeps showing up. ** See what's new at http://www.aol.com

Re: [LegacyUG] Alternate Names in Index?

2007-09-12 Thread BrannenGA
Ok, I did that. Still doesn't work. ** See what's new at http://www.aol.com Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online

Re: [LegacyUG] Alternate Names in Index?

2007-09-11 Thread BrannenGA
I did have Alternate given and surnames' checked on the Include tab on the Options for Descendant Books screen. And it still doesn't work. Is everyone looking at the same report? Or did I find a bug in the program for Descendant Book reports?

Re: [LegacyUG] Alternate Names in Index?

2007-09-11 Thread BrannenGA
I've checked every check box that has to do with putting the alternate names in the index and nothing is working. The alt names show up in the report but not the index. I upgraded the program last week to get the latest and greatest. Is this a bug in the Descendant Book Report?

Re: [LegacyUG] Alternate Names in Index?

2007-09-10 Thread BrannenGA
** See what's new at http://www.aol.com Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support:

Re: [LegacyUG] Alternate Names in Index?

2007-09-10 Thread BrannenGA
This still isn't working. [And I don't see an option in AOL for sending email in plain text.] I've selected the following menu choices and still do not get the alternate names to appear in the index. They do appear in the report. Here's my sequence of selections in the drop-down

Fwd: [LegacyUG] Alternate Names in Index?

2007-09-10 Thread BrannenGA
** See what's new at http://www.aol.com Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support:

Re: [LegacyUG] Alternate Names in Index?

2007-09-06 Thread BrannenGA
I checked the appropriate options, but it still doesn't work as far as I can tell. I guessed that checking this option would give the person's full name as one entry and his nick-name as another entry. The narrative in the report gives the alternate name, but the index doesn't. Do

[LegacyUG] How to make entire database available?

2007-09-06 Thread BrannenGA
We have only 10 or 12 generations going back 200 years. After thinking about it, I realize now that the Descendants Book Report is including just direct descendants of the earliest guy and isn't including the parents of the in-laws and all their ancestors and relatives. These would

[LegacyUG] Alternate Names in Index?

2007-09-05 Thread BrannenGA
Publishing Center Descendant Book Report Additional Index Options Include a name index Include alternate names. I checked the above option, but the alternate names don't appear anywhere in the index. Am I misunderstanding what this feature is? ALSO: Is it possible to not print

[LegacyUG] Print Entire Database?

2007-09-05 Thread BrannenGA
I have about 8700 names in the database, and there is one main ancestor couple from whom everyone is descended. It looks like only about half of this number is being outputted in the descendant book report. Is there a way to include everyone in the database in an output report that

Re: [LegacyUG] Alternate Names in Index?

2007-09-05 Thread BrannenGA
OK, I was starting from Publisher Center. That route doesn't give those options. But I see them when going through the toolbar icon. Thanks. ** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour Legacy User Group

Re: [LegacyUG] Large Format Printing

2007-04-28 Thread BrannenGA
This may be neither here nor there, but somewhere in the Charting Companion instructions it says that something like only 400 or 500 people can be adequately charted at a time, and I believe that now. I tried a file of 1800 people on a Kinko's plotter, and it printed to a sheet 12 ft long

Re: [LegacyUG] Charting recommendations

2007-04-14 Thread BrannenGA
The charting deficiencies are exasperating. I wish they would team up with AutoCAD to create some software that would allow much more to be done in this area. The charts and trees are probably the most popular keepsakes at family reunions. I think there's a big demand for these. At

Re: [LegacyUG] Problem with File Importing -- Figured it out

2006-10-18 Thread BrannenGA
Legacy could better their product byadding another sentence or two to their instructions to point out that the extra step is needed. That would save some new users some trial-and-error time. There isn't any safety gainedbyrequiring an extra step to create the third, combined file because

Re: [LegacyUG] Problem with File Importing

2006-10-17 Thread BrannenGA
I see someone else had this problem There around 2000 people in each file with maybe 100 overlapping names. I looked for all the names in all the views and lists. There are only 2100 names appearing. I checked my original two files and the newly created third file. None of them have the

Re: [LegacyUG] Problem with File Importing -- Figured it out

2006-10-17 Thread BrannenGA
I think the directions in the instruction manual and the pop-up prompts are incomplete on this. When you want to merge two Legacy files by using the Import command, the prompt encourages you to create a third file. When you do this, all that happens is that the incoming file goes into that