PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kirsten
Bowman
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 3:29 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup
Subject: [LegacyUG] Blended Family?
During the American Revolution, Frederick and Margaret Williams took seven
children to Canada. One was probably their own son (no problem), two were
Margaret'
ronald ferguson wrote:
Gene,
It is not greyed out on mine, neither in Descendant Book nor Descendant
Narrative Reports, and the relationship shows up fine in the reports. I suggest
that you try resetting (bottom right of the opening page) or if that doesn't
work deleting the Descend.usr f
t of us are
probably following relatives that actually have no relationship whatsoever
to us.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wayne
Martell
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 1:28 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [Lega
> Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:09:24 -0400
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Blended Family?
>
> Kirsten Bowman wrote:
>> Gene:
>>
>> You're correct about the term, of course. "Stepchild&q
Kirsten Bowman wrote:
Gene:
You're correct about the term, of course. "Stepchild" was the word used in
the original documents but in today's terminology they would probably be
foster children. (I don't think there was any actual adoption.) Changing
the children's settings doesn't appear to ha
ayne Martell
Victoria, BC, Canada
- Original Message -
From: Kirsten Bowman
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 8:56 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Blended Family?
Gene:
You're correct about the term, of course. "Stepchild" was the wo
.
Is it hopeless then?
Kirsten
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gene
Young
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 5:35 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Blended Family?
Kirsten Bowman wrote:
Is there a way t
---
From: Kirsten Bowman
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 8:56 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Blended Family?
Gene:
You're correct about the term, of course. "Stepchild" was the word used in
the original documents but in today's terminolog
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gene
Young
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 5:35 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Blended Family?
Kirsten Bowman wrote:
Is there a way that I can include Margaret's nieces
> and nephew in
Kirsten Bowman wrote:
Is there a way that I can include Margaret's nieces
and nephew in Frederick's Descendant Book Report as stepchildren of both
Frederick and Margaret? How?
Kirsten
They would not be step-children, they would be at most adopted. This can be indicated under
children's s
During the American Revolution, Frederick and Margaret Williams took seven
children to Canada. One was probably their own son (no problem), two were
Margaret's by her first marriage (also no problem), three were the children
of Margaret's sister (this is the problem!), and parents of the seventh a
11 matches
Mail list logo
