a) web page generation (needs some improvement).
Agree, but I haven't found any family history program that gets it right
(which is why I'm writing my own)
b) single event attached to multiple individuals.
Yes - one of the features I miss from my time using TMG
c) separate the program files fr
I agree too. However for me that (along with your "includes") would include:
a) web page generation (needs some improvement).
b) single event attached to multiple individuals.
c) separate the program files from the user files. i.e. put the
program in "Program Files" and put the user files in "My
I too support Legacy remaining a pure genealogy program. However for me
that includes
a) the ability to export its reports to a wordprocessor for further editing
(which it does)
b) and - because it has become a accepted part of genealogy programs - much
improved charting capability
Jeff
-
---
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:LegacyUserGroup- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> ronald ferguson
> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 3:46 PM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Legacy - What is it for?
>
> Following recent suggesti
CTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of C.G.
> Ouimet
> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 7:02 PM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy - What is it for?
>
>
> I think it would be good to incorporate X10 capabilities in Legacy so
I also would like to see Legacy return to its core function.
Randy
On 2/14/07, ronald ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Following recent suggestions for additions to Legacy I received the email
below from a long standing user of Legacy. As his views broadly speaking
reflect mine I thought me
and does so many things that are
seldom used, it will not fit into ones pocket and is so hefty the temptation is
to leave it at home.
Roger Jones> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com> Subject: [LegacyUG] Legacy - What is it
for?> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21
: [LegacyUG] Legacy - What is it for?
I think it would be good to incorporate X10 capabilities in Legacy so that
when you're working in the wee hours, the lights could be turned on in the
den and the coffee maker could be turned on to keep me awake.
It might also be good to be able to program m
e.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy - What is it for?
You mean you actually watch TV?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of C.G. Ouimet
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 7:02 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] L
You mean you actually watch TV?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of C.G. Ouimet
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 7:02 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy - What is it for?
I think it would be good to
ald ferguson
> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 3:46 PM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Legacy - What is it for?
>
>
> Following recent suggestions for additions to Legacy I received the email
> below from a long standing user of Legacy. As his
;m
missing while I'm busy searching online.
P.S. Just kidding ...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Brown
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 18:35
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy - What is it
: [LegacyUG] Legacy - What is it for?
Following recent suggestions for additions to Legacy I received the email
below from a long standing user of Legacy. As his views broadly speaking
reflect mine I thought members of LUG may be interested in an alternative
perspective.
Ron Ferguson
>F
Following recent suggestions for additions to Legacy I received the email
below from a long standing user of Legacy. As his views broadly speaking
reflect mine I thought members of LUG may be interested in an alternative
perspective.
Ron Ferguson
From : dlks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent : 1
14 matches
Mail list logo
