Guido Leeten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy?
> Well, that is the reason I do not SPEND any money on Legacy, they claim a
> lot of things, but,... there are much better free programs, I u
AIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 11:38 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy?
Jenny,
I definitely am not "anti-Legacy". However, I am very discouraged by
Legacy's lack of legitimate features. Both version 5 and version 6 wer
t: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 8:39 am
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? -TH
While I am not an authority on genealogy or Legacy, unless you are
only doing a direct line of descent or ascent, there would come a
point where some step children would be
blood relatives.
A coup
While I am not an authority on genealogy or Legacy, unless you are
only doing a direct line of descent or ascent, there would come a
point where some step children would be
blood relatives.
A couple who marries, each having children from previous marriages,
and then have children of their own, may
Jenny,
I definitely am not "anti-Legacy". However, I am very discouraged by
Legacy's lack of legitimate features. Both version 5 and version 6 were
nothing more than additional bloat ware with no real features. The
Geo-Database hasn't been updated since it was introduced in version 5,
desp
Ron Bernier wrote
Unfortunately the "it would require a complete program rewrite" has
become the standard mantra for the Millennia folks. They want to stay
competitive, but they refuse to offer any of the features that their
competition does offer. Both TMG and Genbox offer a witness feature.
What was the route that Ultimate Fasmily Tree went down?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 6:37 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Re: Legacy: Family History
:32 pm
Subject: [LegacyUG] Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? -TH
Legacy can handle all blood relationships including step without a
problem. I wish everyone would please remember that genealogy and
family history are two very different things. A scholarly genealogy is
literally a l
Well, that's it, I can't take anymore. I've been reading this negative
stuff for two days now. I've been doing genealogy for 17 years and I don't
think any of the other programs come even close to Legacy in what the
software offers for the price we pay for the product. What in the world do
you e
Legacy can handle all blood relationships including step without a problem. I
wish everyone would please remember that genealogy and family history are two
very different things. A scholarly genealogy is literally a list of "begats."
The "begats" with which most of us are familiar occur in the B
I hope I'm wrong but it seems to me that Legacy may be going down the
same road Ultimate Fasmily Tree went down.
-Original Message-
From: Ron Bernier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 6:53 pm
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Re: Leg
listening in
on their planning sessions.
Renee Zamora
www.harrisena.com
- Original Message -
From: "Ron Bernier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy?
Renee,
Unfortunate
Now that was a very logical and excellent point. You have made me re-think
my position. I would think that should settle the matter. Now we should
leave it up to Legacy to decide how it should be placed on the priority
list. They know how it would affect programming issues and do-ability.
Ren
Renee,
Unfortunately the "it would require a complete program rewrite" has
become the standard mantra for the Millennia folks. They want to stay
competitive, but they refuse to offer any of the features that their
competition does offer. Both TMG and Genbox offer a witness feature.
Genbox
Wow, that's a hard thing to consider. I would hate to have to see the
program all rewritten over link FTM 2008 just went through. But on the other
hand is it worth it to get the things we want. I would love to have
witnesses but I hear that it a requires a re-write to accomplish that.
What I
>From the legacy help file "What is Legacy":
"Legacy is a family history computer program ... etc."
Legacy is allready much more then just a genealogy programm (see the
Publishing Center in the report section) and that's how I like it.
Evert
> Should Legacy be developed along the lines of a Fa
16 matches
Mail list logo
