Ron
That email sums up my thoughts exactly. Cudos to you and the person that
sent it to you
Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ronald
ferguson
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 4:46 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject:
;m
missing while I'm busy searching online.
P.S. Just kidding ...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Brown
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 18:35
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy - What is it
Ron
I smiled when I read your email and Dick's. I go back a ways too---1982,
Family Roots, Apple IIc. Before that it was exclusively stubby pencil and
paper.
The 1982 days saw the barest of bones for a computer genealogy
program---but, oh my, it was SO much better than that ole stubby pencil.
I
You mean you actually watch TV?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of C.G. Ouimet
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 7:02 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy - What is it for?
I think it would be good to
e.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy - What is it for?
You mean you actually watch TV?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of C.G. Ouimet
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 7:02 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] L
: [LegacyUG] Legacy - What is it for?
I think it would be good to incorporate X10 capabilities in Legacy so that
when you're working in the wee hours, the lights could be turned on in the
den and the coffee maker could be turned on to keep me awake.
It might also be good to be able to program m
I use Legacy as a tool. It records my data. It does not do everything I want
but that is OK and I do not have a problem with that. I just use other tools
that suit me.
The impression I have is that Legacy is in danger of becoming similar to a
Swiss army style knife that has so many blades and
I also would like to see Legacy return to its core function.
Randy
On 2/14/07, ronald ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Following recent suggestions for additions to Legacy I received the email
below from a long standing user of Legacy. As his views broadly speaking
reflect mine I thought me
CTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of C.G.
> Ouimet
> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 7:02 PM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy - What is it for?
>
>
> I think it would be good to incorporate X10 capabilities in Legacy so
Ron
I smiled when I read your email and Dick's. I go back a ways too---1982,
Family Roots, Apple IIc. Before that it was exclusively stubby pencil and
paper.
The 1982 days saw the barest of bones for a computer genealogy
program---but, oh my, it was SO much better than that ole stubby pencil.
I
I too support Legacy remaining a pure genealogy program. However for me
that includes
a) the ability to export its reports to a wordprocessor for further editing
(which it does)
b) and - because it has become a accepted part of genealogy programs - much
improved charting capability
Jeff
-
I agree too. However for me that (along with your "includes") would include:
a) web page generation (needs some improvement).
b) single event attached to multiple individuals.
c) separate the program files from the user files. i.e. put the
program in "Program Files" and put the user files in "My
a) web page generation (needs some improvement).
Agree, but I haven't found any family history program that gets it right
(which is why I'm writing my own)
b) single event attached to multiple individuals.
Yes - one of the features I miss from my time using TMG
c) separate the program files fr
13 matches
Mail list logo
