Re: [LegacyUG] Out-of-wedlock children...another bug?

2006-10-20 Thread Brian/Support
/Support Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 1:33 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Out-of-wedlock children...another bug? That half source problem was part of the Set relationships problem. The fix will be included in the next update to Legacy. Brian Customer

RE: [LegacyUG] Out-of-wedlock children

2006-10-19 Thread Kate
Oregon, USA 503-910-6055 (cell phone) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patricia Hickin Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 4:52 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Out-of-wedlock children I agree about "Unknown"

Re: [LegacyUG] Out-of-wedlock children...another bug?

2006-10-19 Thread Cathy
However, the other bug re the children who are actually half siblings being reported as 1st cousins by the relationship calculator if the unknown fathers are left blank and not all showing in when kids> is chosen, is not fixed in the current beta. Cathy At 01:33 AM 20/10/2006, you wrote: That

Re: [LegacyUG] Out-of-wedlock children

2006-10-19 Thread Patricia Hickin
I agree about "Unknown" or FNU LNU, but with 3 different fathers I also think you need Unknown 1, Unknown 2, Unknown 3. - Original Message - From: "Laurence E Stephenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 11:44 PM Subject: Re:

RE: [LegacyUG] Out-of-wedlock children...another bug?

2006-10-19 Thread Jane Fabiano-Turner
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Out-of-wedlock children...another bug? That half source problem was part of the Set relationships problem. The fix will be included in the next update to Legacy. Brian Customer Support Millennia Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: [LegacyUG] Out-of-wedlock children...another bug?

2006-10-19 Thread Brian/Support
That half source problem was part of the Set relationships problem. The fix will be included in the next update to Legacy. Brian Customer Support Millennia Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com We are changing the world of genealogy! When replying to this message, pleas

Re: [LegacyUG] Out-of-wedlock children...another bug?

2006-10-19 Thread JRAYMOND651
With thanks to an Australian lister, I've managed to enter two of the three out-of-wedlock children in the manner I wanted. (I don't know the name of the third child.) Cousin Mary now has three marriages with the first two showing an unknown husband. I did this by creating a dummy husband

Re: [LegacyUG] Out-of-wedlock children

2006-10-19 Thread Jenny M Benson
wrote I have a cousin, "Mary," who had three out-of-wedlock children with three different men before she married and had six children in that marriage. For the three out-of-wedlock children, I do not know the names of the fathers. Legacy insists on adding a father before children can be

Re: [LegacyUG] Out-of-wedlock children

2006-10-18 Thread Tracy Skegg
Hi Listers I've had a few of these occurances. I've often added the person as an unlinked individual and then added whichever mother/father I know about. Legacy creates a marriage record, but the spouse is blank and I've set my defaults to keep reports blank when information is not entered, I do

Re: [LegacyUG] Out-of-wedlock children

2006-10-18 Thread Cathy
Hi Jon, All children have fathers even if they are unknown. You cannot add a child in Legacy without adding a "marriage" The father does not need to be added. You can choose in Options > Customise to leave unknown fathers (Data format tab: Word for blank records) Your choice is to add all t

Re: [LegacyUG] Out-of-wedlock children

2006-10-18 Thread Laurence E Stephenson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I posed this question once before, but am still having problems with the data entry. I have a cousin, "Mary," who had three out-of-wedlock children with three different men before she married and had six children in that marriage. For the three out-of-wedlock chil