nt: Friday, August 24, 2007 6:03 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] RE: Scan File Formats
Hi Denise,
Microsoft Office Document Imaging is a part of Microsoft Office.
It is useful if you are scanning printed text as it can convert the
image to text you can edit o
in the future.
Renee Zamora
www.harrisena.com
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Briscoe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 3:10 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] RE: Scan File Formats
I suspect that the point was that if detail has been lost in conver
Hi Denise,
Microsoft Office Document Imaging is a part of Microsoft Office.
It is useful if you are scanning printed text as it can convert the
image to text you can edit or copy and paste into your Legacy notes.
This is known as OCR - Optical Character Recognition. Your scanner
probably came
k
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 12:16 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] RE: Scan File Formats
Art, What is PDFFIll PDF Editor? I haven't heard of it.
After thinking about formats a bit more. I agree that TIF would probably be
best for archiving photos, but for mul
: RE: [LegacyUG] RE: Scan File Formats
Denise Levenick, Hello
Get primo a free program http://www.primopdf.com/
Laurence E Stephenson, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
25-08-07
- Receiving the following content -
From: Denise Levenick <mail
Denise Levenick, Hello
Get primo a free program http://www.primopdf.com/
Laurence E Stephenson, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
25-08-07
- Receiving the following content -
From: Denise Levenick
Receiver: LegacyUserGroup
Time: 2007-08-25, 08:07:11
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] RE: Scan File
).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of C.G. Ouimet
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 2:53 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] RE: Scan File Formats
300dpi is more than sufficient for anything you scan from paper, including
@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] RE: Scan File Formats
It seems like the most efficient method would be to scan and save as TIFF.
B/c I am attaching or linking a file to my database I need to be sensitive
to file size... perhaps linking is the most expedient, as long as I keep my
root file in the
That is more or less what I said ...
C.G. Ouimet
Kingston, ON
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Junk Man
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 17:04
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] RE: Scan File Formats
Technically C.G., you
It seems like the most efficient method would be to scan and save as TIFF.
B/c I am attaching or linking a file to my database I need to be sensitive
to file size... perhaps linking is the most expedient, as long as I keep my
root file in the same directory as my database. I don't want to lose thos
ehalf Of hwedhlor
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 16:45
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] RE: Scan File Formats
Renee,
Just as you can change a TIF to a JPG or 'print' a TIF to a PDF file, it is
perfectly possible to change a PDF or JPG file into a TIF.
To ch
: 24 August 2007 21:45
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] RE: Scan File Formats
>
> Renee,
>
> Just as you can change a TIF to a JPG or 'print' a TIF to a
> PDF file, it is perfectly possible to change a PDF or JPG
> file into a T
45
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] RE: Scan File Formats
>
> Renee,
>
> Just as you can change a TIF to a JPG or 'print' a TIF to a PDF file, it
> is
> perfectly possible to change a PDF or JPG file into a TIF.
>
> To change
n, ON
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hwedhlor
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 16:45
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] RE: Scan File Formats
Renee,
Just as you can change a TIF to a JPG or 'print' a TIF to a
: RE: [LegacyUG] RE: Scan File Formats
> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:33:18 +0100
>
>
> Denise,
>
> Size is not the only consideration here. As Cathy says, tiff is non
lossy
> and great for archiving pictures for editing and jpg (not jpeg) for a
> finished version for use i
ubject: RE: [LegacyUG] RE: Scan File Formats
Art, What is PDFFIll PDF Editor? I haven't heard of it.
After thinking about formats a bit more. I agree that TIF would probably be
best for archiving photos, but for multiple page letters that will only be
viewed, not edited, wouldn'
ee.com> Subject:
> RE: [LegacyUG] RE: Scan File Formats> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:33:18 +0100>
> > > Denise,> > Size is not the only consideration here. As Cathy says, tiff
> is non lossy > and great for archiving pictures for editing and jpg (not
> jpeg) for a &g
erGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] RE: Scan File Formats
And for saving black and white text I have had the best luck scanning
Line Art into PDFill PDF Editor. It gives better copies than Grey Scale or
diffusion and makes a very small file - a 4 page will only 158k.
Art Se
@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 1:49 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] RE: Scan File Formats
I agree on your TIFF/JPG comment.
Scan in TIFF. Then create a smaller JPG from that TIFF to keep in the folder
where you have Legacy link to.
In my view, scanning to PDF should only be used to
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ronald
ferguson
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 02:33
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] RE: Scan File Formats
Denise,
Size is not the only consideration here. As Cathy says, tiff is non lossy
and great for
Denise,
Size is not the only consideration here. As Cathy says, tiff is non lossy
and great for archiving pictures for editing and jpg (not jpeg) for a
finished version for use in reports or web pages.
PDF is somewhat different and one really needs to consider how the pictures
will be used.
21 matches
Mail list logo
