RE: [LegacyUG] Source Detail vs Event Data

2008-06-21 Thread Geoff Rasmussen
Bob, You're right. Copying/pasting is the right thing to do here. Yes, it is redundant to have the census transcription both in the event notes and in the source detail text. But if it's just a copy/paste which doesn't take too much time, it's not time totally wasted. The reason why I put it

Re: [LegacyUG] Source Detail vs Event Data

2008-06-21 Thread Jenny M Benson
wrote 2) Another anomaly I seem to have encountered. In trying to 'correct/change' an old event by re-installing the census event data under the sourcewriter, I see that the data is entered twice for all children in the Chronology view. To add to the confusion, in this view, there is a

RE: [LegacyUG] Source Detail vs Event Data

2008-06-21 Thread s2f
Geoff - Thanks for the clarificationi - thougth I had missed a step somewhere. :-) So, I should just leave my data as is and concentrate on the steps when entering new sources and events? Bob Geoff Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bob, You're right. Copying/pasting is the right