Jenny,
Let's talk about it then. Elizabeth Mills has certainly provided the
researcher with flexibility to split or lump. What specific fields would you
want to be included with the master source? After deciding that, we'd need
to then come up with a simple, understandable source type name for
I agree with Jenny.
I have a Master Source for EACH individual I have corresponded with.
Of my 202 Master Sources, 80 are with individuals. Several of those
individuals have 40 or more Source Detail records! (working on reports
for a family reunion).
Personally, I don't (think) I need more than
at
the Master Source level.
Kirsten
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bruce
Jones
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 12:20 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: E-mail
I agree with Jenny.
I have a Master
This is how I do it, too. The master source is the person and the details
indicate phone, email, etc.
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:19:35 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: E-mail
I agree with Jenny.
I have a Master
4 matches
Mail list logo
