RE: [LegacyUG] Transcriptions/originals

2008-04-27 Thread Kirsten Bowman
Kim: As others have said, there's good reason to record every reference to your family that you've found when researching (and I wouldn't combine them). When you publish your work, however, the guidelines are a little different. In publishing, you would generally pare your sources down to the best

Re: [LegacyUG] Transcriptions/originals

2008-04-27 Thread Heather Stovold
I would keep both sources (and I do) I have sources along the lines of Census - Transcription - 1881 - Ontario, York West Census - Index - 1881 - Ontario, York West Census - Image - 1881 - Ontario, York West Census - Film - 1881 - Ontario York West I would use up to all 4, depending on what

RE: [LegacyUG] Transcriptions/originals

2008-04-27 Thread ronald ferguson
Kim, I never combine sources. It is my view that each source stands by itself and should be recorded as such, for the benefit of both myself and any future researchers. If the sources give different "facts" then I still enter both, and usually make a note as to why I have elected to choose a p

Re: [LegacyUG] Transcriptions/originals

2008-04-27 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
--- Kimberly Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Much of my initial data comes from transcriptions of > church and civil > documents. Eventually, I will check against the > originals. (I've done > some volunteer transcribing, so I know the value of > seeing the > original hand-written document for