Probably the update after v7.0.0.55 when they removed the very useful
option to merge a basic source into a sourcewriter source.
The programmers assume we are all idiots and try to make it idiot
proof even if it means removing a useful feature.
--
Richard Van Wasshnova
http://www.gencircles.com/us
I am surprised I didn't notice it before now. I actually used it quite a
bit.
michele
- Original Message -
From: "Judy"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 6:39 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] appending?
Michele~
You're not seeing it because it was remov
Michele~
You're not seeing it because it was removed several "upgrades" back.
:-( Glad to know that there is someone other than myself who misses the
feature.
Judy
- Original Message -
From: "Michele Lewis"
To: "Legacy E-Mail List"
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 5:40 PM
S
On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:57:31 -0700, JLB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It's not my job to bring it back.
No. Not mine either. I am perfectly happy with V6 (except for the
leftover bugs).
--
Dennis Kowallek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. Emails not of "Content-Type: text/plain" are deleted before ever r
I am just happy that finally several people know what I am talking about :)
Since it isn't available in V7 I will just live with it :)
michele
- Original Message -
From: "Dennis M. Kowallek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 8:51 PM
S
05, 2008 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] appending?
On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:19:59 -0700, JLB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I thought it was a nuisance to have to make yet another
decision at that point because who would ever want to append to an
existing source?
You were not appending to an exi
Yep, that's what I meant. Apparently my usual eloquence is under the
weather today. It's not my job to bring it back.
-
JL
JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists
http://www.jgen.ws/jlog.html
Dennis M. Kowallek wrote:
On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:19:59 -0700, JLB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:19:59 -0700, JLB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I thought it was a nuisance to have to make yet another
>decision at that point because who would ever want to append to an
>existing source?
You were not appending to an existing source. You were appending an
additional citati
Michele,
I woke up this morning to a thread called 'Appending' that went the
whole length of my screen. I didn't dare jump in for fear of being
irrelevant. Obviously, I missed the spirit of it. Every few emails
there you were again saying, is essence, EVERYBODY IS MISUNDERSTANDING
ME. Tha
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 08:46:58 +1000, "Judy Wardlaw"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>You do not have to keep going back to the individual to add a new sources to
>the clipboard. You can save up to 10 sources on the clipboard as you could
>in Version 6 .When you want to add saved source(s) to another i
Michelle
You do not have to keep going back to the individual to add a new sources to
the clipboard. You can save up to 10 sources on the clipboard as you could
in Version 6 .When you want to add saved source(s) to another individual all
you need to do is right click on the "Open source clipbo
rest)"
Since I never used it, prefering to work with only one source at a time (Not
good at multi-tasking?) but it is still there (apparently).
Sorry for my confusion,
Rich in LA CA
--- On Fri, 9/5/08, Dennis M. Kowallek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Dennis M. Kowallek <[
Sorry, but since I could not understand 'appending' to a source, decided to
watch who else answered. What do you mean? I have some sources, which are
correspondences to me from family memebers, (Source name = Smith, John) that I
include in the 'text of source' the transcripts of each letter, the
Yes, Gene!!! That's it! That is exactly what I am talking about It
won't let me do that anymore.
michele
From the help file:
-
"Quick Copy Existing Citations to the Source Clipboard
"You can copy one or more (up to five) so
looks like two pieces of paper) and it would ask you if you wanted to
overwrite or append. Now you only have the option to overwrite.
michele
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Carneal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 9:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Leg
Michele Lewis wrote:
No, not the tab things. I am having a hard time explaining this. Ok
Let's say I pull up a person and I am looking at their list of sources.
I can highlight a source and hit that copy button on the left hand side
at the bottom and a box will come up that says, Copy
Michele Lewis wrote:
Append means add to.
For example... I highlight a source I want to copy so that I can use if
for the next person. Then I highlight another source and I want to ADD
it to what I am going to copy. Then when I go to the person I am going
to copy to, BOTH sources will be co
mpson
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Carneal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 5:52 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] appending?
I wish I could include a graphic. If, she is referring to the five sources
available shown by five different tabs, we
ce.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gene Young
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 8:06 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] appending?
From the
ay, September 05, 2008 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] appending?
Michele,
I think I understand what you are talking about, but I still think it
does refer to the tabs on the old V6 source clipboard. In V6, if you
selected to copy a source to the clipboard, you were asked if you
wanted append
I wish I could include a graphic. If, she is referring to the five
sources available shown by five different tabs, we seem to have more
now, albeit pretty well hidden. Michele, please try this and see if
it answers your query:
1. Open Legacy
2. Select someone, to go to that person's Individual
.uk/fergys/
_
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] appending?
> Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 09:03:46 -0400
>
> Append means add to.
>
> For example... I highlight
But, I can save up to ten saved sources and pick from those. I pick
from a drop down list, not tabs. Would that serve your needs? I will
send you some screen shots off list if you want.
Robert
At 2008-09-05 08:13 AM, you wrote:
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 08:32:14 -0400, "Michele Lewis"
<[EMAIL PROTE
Michele~
We can no longer "append" sources in Version 7. Version 6 had the fantastic
capability of allowing us to have multiple sources available on a "tabbed"
clipboard and "append" or overwrite on the tabs. Version 7 does not offer
us that option.
Still a great program.
Judy
My que
I believe (and could be wrong) that she is referring to the Source
Clipboard, and in V6 you could have, I believe, up to five sources, depicted
by five different tabs.
The source clipboard in V7 appears to be a singular source at a time, with
no multiple clipboard option.
I've wondered this same
Michele,
I think I understand what you are talking about, but I still think it
does refer to the tabs on the old V6 source clipboard. In V6, if you
selected to copy a source to the clipboard, you were asked if you
wanted append (i.e., add that source to the sources already on the
clipboard) or if
lf Of ronald
ferguson
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 8:51 AM
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] appending?
Michele,
I'm afraid that I, for one, do not know what you mean by "append" in this
context - which may imply that the answer is
No, not the tab things. I am having a hard time explaining this. Ok
Let's say I pull up a person and I am looking at their list of sources. I can
highlight a source and hit that copy button on the left hand side at the bottom
and a box will come up that says, Copy the highlighted source c
.
michele
- Original Message -
From: "ronald ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 8:50 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] appending?
Michele,
I'm afraid that I, for one, do not know what you mean by "append" in this
context - whi
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 08:32:14 -0400, "Michele Lewis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>My questions was not answered. Can we or can we not append sources?
>
>When I am working on a specific person and I go into his/her source list and
>I highlight a source I want to copy, I could swear that version 6 wo
Appending means adding to something that already exists. I understand
perferctly well what she means.
- Original Message -
From: "Jane Fabiano-Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 9:00 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] appending?
Can't
2008 9:00 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] appending?
Can't you just add another source to the person? Michelle, is that what
you
mean by append?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (please note my new email)
Visit my websites: www.wmwebmasters.com and www.jftwd.com
-Original Message-
From:
Michele,
I'm afraid that I, for one, do not know what you mean by "append" in this
context - which may imply that the answer is "no".
Ron Ferguson
_
*New* Insert Pictures Into your Web Pages - Blogs
http://www.fergys.co.uk
V
33 matches
Mail list logo
