.
As for the cruise... I am jealous ;)
-Original Message-
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of RICHARD SCHULTHIES
Sent: June-11-09 2:33 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] source types - new not integrated?
Right now my
it.
Rich in LA CA
--- On Tue, 6/9/09, Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.uk
wrote:
From: Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.uk
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] source types - new not
integrated?
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Date: Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 2:21 AM
Paula
heard it.
Rich in LA CA
--- On Tue, 6/9/09, Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.uk
wrote:
From: Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.uk
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] source types - new not
integrated?
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Date: Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 2:21 AM
Paula
Keep us posted. ;)
Thanks,
--Paula
--- On Thu, 6/11/09, RICHARD SCHULTHIES fourpa...@verizon.net wrote:
Right now my census records are named this way.
'USA, IL, Cook, Chicago, 1930'. Whenever the converter is
operational (if ever), I will convert all my stuff. The
multiple field types
;-).
Kirsten
-Original Message-
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com]on
Behalf Of Paula Ryburn
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 7:05 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] source types - new not integrated?
Rich, I am where you
Paula Ryburn wrote
But I have dozens of census sources
I am always rather amazed at how much splitting of Census sources
seems to go on with LUGgers researching in the US - a separate one for
every county or even every city for every year quite often, I think.
Perhaps this is necessary with
wanted
to see who has been cited on a (any) census. Again, this is not urgent, so I
will just move on.
Thanks,
--Paula
--- On Mon, 6/8/09, Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.uk wrote:
From: Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.uk
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] source types - new not integrated
, or at least before I heard it.
Rich in LA CA
--- On Tue, 6/9/09, Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.uk wrote:
From: Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.uk
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] source types - new not integrated?
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Date: Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 2:21 AM
Paula Ryburn
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] source types - new not
integrated?
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Date: Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 2:21 AM
Paula Ryburn wrote
But I have dozens of census sources
I am always rather amazed at how much splitting of
Census
sources seems to go
Pauline,
Thank you for the detailed information. I suspected that report could serve my
purposes. I just need to tinker around with it. ;)
--Paula
--- On Tue, 6/9/09, Pauline B. Cramer crame...@comcast.net wrote:
Paula,
If you just want to see who has been cited on a (any)
census, you
Paula,
Can you please send you posts in Plain Text and not HTML.
How are are you creating the lists. Are you using SearchFind and is it
possible that Census/Tax is in the Master source on one and in the Detail on
the other?
Ron Ferguson
Uncheck all the boxes under Show Only
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Paula Ryburn paula.ryb...@sbcglobal.netwrote:
In researching some other features, I tried to do a Show List on source
type Census/Tax and it appears to show only those people for whom I've
cited census sources in the old
@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] source types - new not integrated?
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 23:02:44 +0100
Paula,
Can you please send you posts in Plain Text and not HTML.
How are are you creating the lists. Are you using SearchFind and is it
possible that Census/Tax
Paula Ryburn wrote
In researching some other features, I tried to do a Show List on
source type Census/Tax and it appears to show only those people for
whom I've cited census sources in the old way. That is, the people
for whom I've cited census sources this year (with 7.0) are not showing
if this is unchangable.
--- On Mon, 6/8/09, Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.uk wrote:
From: Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.uk
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] source types - new not integrated?
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Date: Monday, June 8, 2009, 4:11 PM
Paula Ryburn wrote
Ronald,
I apologize about the rich text. I need to keep creating emails to LUG from my
browser... it's set up for plain text.
I'm looking in View Master Lists Source Type. click on Census/Tax to
highlight it, then click button for Show List. It's not a search thing.
Thanks,
--Paula
There isn't one of those boxes for Source Types (View Master Lists).
Thanks,
--Paula
--- On Mon, 6/8/09, Randolph Clark ceddaco...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Randolph Clark ceddaco...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] source types - new not integrated?
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
/09, RICHARD SCHULTHIES fourpa...@verizon.net wrote:
From: RICHARD SCHULTHIES fourpa...@verizon.net
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] source types - new not integrated?
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Date: Monday, June 8, 2009, 8:07 PM
I just tried this and since I use both Basic and Writer
18 matches
Mail list logo
