Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania

2019-08-03 Thread Donna Newell
This is very wise. Avoid confusion. Avoid abbreviations, USA could be United States or Union of South Africa. Use appropriate names, enter place as it is in the time period that the event takes place. Study up on genealogy standards and practices. Sent from my iPad > On Aug 3, 2019, at 9:0

Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania

2019-08-03 Thread Roberta Schwalm
Yes, it is. CA is the abbreviation for both California and Canada, which is why I always enter California or Canada instead of simply CA. On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 9:23 PM Anne Hildrum wrote: > Well isn't CA an Acronym. > > > > Ane > > > > *From:* LegacyUserGroup *On > Behalf Of *Ian Macaulay >

Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania

2019-08-03 Thread Christopher Seward Sr.
James, It makes perfect sense.  "New York" - is that New York City, New York County, or New York State? New York ,,,USA would be city ,New York ,,USA would be county ,,New York ,USA would be state If you can tell which one someone meant by just entering "New York", you need to play the lot

Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania

2019-08-03 Thread Anne Hildrum
Well isn't CA an Acronym. Ane From: LegacyUserGroup On Behalf Of Ian Macaulay Sent: Saturday, August 3, 2019 10:51 PM To: Legacy User Group Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania I Live in CA, Not CaliforniaIMHO Acronyms are not proper English, and it confuses

Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania

2019-08-03 Thread Roberta Schwalm
Actually, I use the full name for all locations. I am from Canada. On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 9:00 PM Donna Newell wrote: > Great answer! > > Sent from my iPad > > On Aug 3, 2019, at 3:50 PM, Ian Macaulay wrote: > > I Live in CA, Not CaliforniaIMHO Acronyms are not proper English, and > it co

Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania

2019-08-03 Thread Donna Newell
Great answer! Sent from my iPad > On Aug 3, 2019, at 3:50 PM, Ian Macaulay wrote: > > I Live in CA, Not CaliforniaIMHO Acronyms are not proper English, and it > confuses your Neighbors. > > >> On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 3:14 PM James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup >> wrote: >> I never had

Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania

2019-08-03 Thread Ian Macaulay
I Live in CA, Not CaliforniaIMHO Acronyms are not proper English, and it confuses your Neighbors. On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 3:14 PM James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup < legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com> wrote: > I never had a Gedcom file not accept any location file whether it had > Indianapol

Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania

2019-08-03 Thread James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup
I never had a Gedcom file not accept any location file whether it had Indianapolis, Marion Co., IN, or even Indianapolis, IN. not to mention Indianapolis, xxx Township, Marion County, Indiana, United States of America.  You soon get the point that the latter is the creation of someone who thinks

Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania

2019-08-03 Thread James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup
What does not make sense is seeing something like:  , , , Indiana, United States of America. when a simple IN  would do.  Or: , , , Berlin, Democratic Republic of Germany.  You can find whatever available record in  Berlin today regardless if it was Prussia, Imperial Germany, Natzi Germany, East

Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania

2019-08-03 Thread sarrazingeorges
Below is an example for the city of Charlesbourg that was merged with Quebec City. (Note: the numbers in the second field correspond to the unique code that identifies the city of Quebec – not essential but useful for locations with the same name but from different areas) Charlesbourg {Québ

Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania

2019-08-03 Thread Connie
Thanks for all the info & suggestions. I did not know about curley brackets so that will be a great help. Thank you everryone. On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 9:43 AM wrote: > Christopher > > I agree with you. > > My suggestion of putting the present name between curly brackets after the > referenced lo

Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania

2019-08-03 Thread sarrazingeorges
Christopher I agree with you. My suggestion of putting the present name between curly brackets after the referenced location name is simply an easy way to translate old location name into present day name and it is accepted by the different Gedcom programs. Georges De : LegacyUserGr

Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania

2019-08-03 Thread Christopher Seward Sr
James, I understand where you're coming from. I just think that handling data in a manner that deviates from the standard is inviting data integrity issues. As I said, the choice is yours. Just be aware of the lasting issues it will cause for those who come after. Christopher On Sat, Aug 3, 2019

Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania

2019-08-03 Thread James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup
Exactly my point.  Putting historical location in the notes maintains all the information one needs and still be sensible and useful to family members.  If people import information without looking at the notes, then they are not being a good genealogist.   It tells me that they just copy things