Brian, Michelle, Barton et al,
Again, please let me be the naysayer.
With some repositories, you can be more specific than just the top level
URL.
For instance...
If you copy a FamilySearch record with their copy button, and paste it
into a detail citation note, it will include the URL of the re
o import
legacy gedcoms? I couldn't find any on the wiki page:
http://tng.lythgoes.net/wiki/index.php/Category:Mods_for_TNG_v10
Also looked for gedcom in previous builds. Could you give a direct
link?
Evert
2015-04-15 8:04 GMT+02:00 John Lisle
<leg...@johnlisle.com
>:
Stuart,
You point
.
Stuart
From: John Lisle
[
mailto:leg...@johnlisle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 15 April 2015 1:56 PM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] TNG and Sources [was: Testing Legacy Web
Pages]
Barton, Margaret, Stuart, et al,
In many of my previous posts, I have talked about
ing to webtrees.
> >
> > For many years my webtrees site has been my prime database and I
> > occasionally export a Gedcom from my site and create a new Legacy .fdb
> > file so as to create reports that aren't available using webtrees.
> > Although I back up my MySQL d
context with the events they documented.
Barton
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:33 PM, John Lisle wrote:
> Barton,
>
> Although WC and FS do not (easily) take media,
> they are worthwhile as places to archive your
> genealogy that also makes your research available to different
&
>
>Barton
>Â
>Â
>Â On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:38 AM, John Lisle wrote:
>Â
>Â > Barton,
> >
> > Two basic types of family tree sites exist: static pages and dynamic
> > pages.
> >
> > Static pages means you create all of the pages
> > you wish
ack up my
>MySQL database every night, creating a new
>Legacy .fdb is another form of backup.
>
>Stuart
>
>-Original Message-
>From: John Lisle [mailto:leg...@johnlisle.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, 14 April 2015 1:39 PM
>To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
>Subject:
Jo and Mike,
Pictlist.dbm is considered an internal file and is, in reality, not well
maintained. Not every Legacy media tool will maintain it.
john.
At 06:55 AM 4/14/2015, Jo Poi wrote:
Following on from Mikes
example.. I only have one picture called grandpa.bmp available to any and
everything t
Barton,
Two basic types of family tree sites exist: static pages and dynamic pages.
Static pages means you create all of the pages
you wish to upload to whatever hosting service
you wish to use. After you create the pages on
your PC; you then have to upload all of the pages
by FTP (or some simila
to go, I think. Don't wait for others to do it
for you -- do it yourself.
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 at 12:18 AM From: "John
Lisle" To:
legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Chasing
the market [was: Any Way to Mark a PERSON ...]
Jay, Your (and my?) idea of w
Jay,
Your (and my?) idea of what the market requires may be different from
what Legacy's management feels is necessary.
Several years ago, an aggressive effort was made to create international
versions. That added greatly to its market.
L7 added mapping, improved privacy, source writer, and seve
this is
something they want to fix.
Not only do they have to change their data model, but they also have
to make significant in a lot of their tools, reports, etc.
john.
At 02:35 PM 4/8/2015, MikeFry wrote:
>On 2015/04/08 19:18 PM, John Lisle wrote:
>
> > One of the major knocks
Hi BobsTree2,
I thought I was done with this thread but your email requires a response.
As much as Legacy is an excellent Family Tree / Genealogy program, it
is also a fine Family *History* program. And I suspect that most
users who are using Legacy to record their genealogy are also
documenting
ajority of the
>most bizarre, unlikely relationships or non-relationships they can think
>about.
>
>Jim
>Legacy Technical Support
>
>
> Original Message
> > From: "John Lisle"
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 11:30 AM
> > T
Jim,
I agree but...
I think that this most people think of this attribute of "Never
Married" as being no formal marriage event, not no relationships.
Further, even were it to mean No Relationships, unless we have
perfect knowledge of the person's life, we would have to say "No
KNOWN Relationship
Pat, Michele, Larry, et al,
I believe Pat is correct in her reasons why these two attributes need to
be split. A person may never have been legally married but might have
been responsible for numerous children.
As a genealogist, we can say that "No evidence that this person ever
married" and "No
submit a
suggestion.
Respectfully,
Ron Bernier
Woonsocket, RI
From: John Lisle
[
mailto:leg...@johnlisle.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 12:15 AM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Comments in GEDCOM [WAS: Details
text showing up in Footnote citation]
Jay
products that
I have reviewed link the attributes that Legacy associates with Child
Status as attributes of the individual, not the family. Legacy needs to
do likewise.
john.
At 09:18 PM 4/1/2015, Jay Wilpolt wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:54 PM,
John Lisle
<leg...@johnlisle.com>
wrote:
The issu
te:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:00
AM, John Lisle
<leg...@johnlisle.com>
wrote:
What is a problem with Legacy is when Legacy does not export any of
its data OR it exports the data in a fashion that cannot be accepted by
the receiving software.
John ,
In regards to
What is a problem with
David,
Your point is well taken, but...
1/ Gedcom was last updated in the late 1990s. In my opinion, it will
never be updated significantly again because (a) too many applications
depend on the current implementation and from a development viewpoint are
static. For instance, RootsWeb's WorldConne
he voices in my head.
http://www.SchmeckAbernathy.com
== All outgoing and incoming mail is scanned by F-Prot Antivirus
==
From: John Lisle
[
mailto:leg...@johnlisle.com]
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 1:11 PM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [Le
7;t see the need for another Custom event. Am I misunderstanding
your comment?
Â
Larry Lee
ldlee.
a...@gmail.com
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 9:18 AM, John Lisle
<leg...@johnlisle.com>
wrote:
Brian, Cathy, et al,
This has been an interesting discussion. Why this discussion is
most
interesting
Brian, Cathy, et al,
This has been an interesting discussion. Why this discussion is most
interesting is how you relate this to how the events are recorded in Legacy.
Brian, having looked at many English parish records, I can agree with
Cathy that Baptism and Christening are used more or less
int
Bob,
Some interesting ideas.
1/ On the Individual Info page and maybe other
places "Given Name" is used the term should be
changed to "Given Names". By being plural, it
will be both clearer and more correct (usually).
2/ Your idea about adding a private note to the a
surname or given names field
24 matches
Mail list logo
