Ward, We are in agreement that date/place type information should be in
the source detail. When I imported my FTM GEDCOM, the source detail went
to Legacy's text field. To correct this on a broad field would require
programing effort and generally programers are not genealogist. I was a
lumping/splitting, and a few about subsequent
citations.
Ward
- Original Message -
From: gambol gam...@juno.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 8:02 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Controlling Subsequent Citation Details [WAS: Legacy
7.5 and source citation
Subsequent Citation Details [WAS: Legacy
7.5 and source citation import?]
Ward, I just responded to Paula on Subsequent Citation Details and yes, I
should have changed to a new tread.
I have been using the Basic Source templates and not the SourceWriter.
This is my first serious attempt in becoming
Leonard,
We had a lot of discussion about Subsequent Citations a while back. I think
March of 2009 might be the most recent. I don't know if anything has changed
in Legacy. I know I logged some requests.
Think of a template-driven (i.e., SourceWriter) citation as consisting of 4
groupings of
4 matches
Mail list logo
