Jenny and Laurel: Thanks for the ideas! I like what you both have, and
have gone with a combination.
Rob
On 8 June 2015 at 05:10, Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.uk wrote:
On 07/06/2015 23:43, Rob Miller wrote:
Thanks Jenny! So you only record the date of the registration (not the
date
On 07/06/2015 23:43, Rob Miller wrote:
Thanks Jenny! So you only record the date of the registration (not the
date of the event) correct?
Correct. Because the event (or Event) in question is the Informing,
which really has little to do with the occasion of what is being
Informed about.
Do
On 07/06/2015 12:32, Rob Miller wrote:
Hello! I'm trying to create a definition for Informants (i.e. Betty was
the informant on her son's civil registration.)
Do Legacy users include the event date AND the registration date in the
definition?
I'm finding it very chewy. Presently I have:
Hello! I'm trying to create a definition for Informants (i.e. Betty was
the informant on her son's civil registration.)
Do Legacy users include the event date AND the registration date in the
definition?
I'm finding it very chewy. Presently I have:
[HeShe] was recorded as the informant [Desc]
Hi Rob, I think adding or not adding the date of the event in addition to
the date of registration is a personal choice. I like to include both. My
event sentence format is different than yours, but here is a Birth Informant
event from my file:
1886 Feb 15 - Birth Informant - Annie registered the
Thanks Jenny! So you only record the date of the registration (not the date
of the event) correct? Do you create the mirror image, and have an event
(following your example) for yourself saying who was the informant on your
record?
Thanks,
Rob
On 7 June 2015 at 08:53, Jenny M Benson
6 matches
Mail list logo
