How about changing the subject line now that it is a different subject!
-Original Message-
From: cranberryf...@cobridge.tv
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 8:19 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy file organization
Dennis,
I would bet that the
chele
-Original Message-
From: Dennis M. Kowallek
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 7:16 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy file organization
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 19:32:30 -0600, Leon Chapman
wrote:
>They appear to be heading toward a fee based system
other people
behind you can do the same thing).
We will just have to wait and see :)
michele
P.S. I am not LDS
-Original Message-
From: Leon Chapman
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 9:32 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy file organization
David:
I
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 19:32:30 -0600, Leon Chapman
wrote:
>They appear to be heading toward a fee based system with all their limited
>access restrictions.
I don't know if this is true, but I for one wouldn't mind paying a small
fee for the convenience of accessing the digitized records from the
c
I love familysearch.org! I have gotten over 500 copies of actual death
certificates and they're now adding marriage affidavits.
Sally
In a message dated 8/2/2011 9:41:48 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
chap...@gmail.com writes:
David:
I have exactly the same experience as you with familysearch.
I
Karen,
I'm in Calgary, Alberta. I don't know if new Family Search is open to LDS
members here.
I will continue to access www.familysearch.org. Although this isn't 'new'
Family search, it is regularly updated with 10s of thousands (if not hundreds
of thousands) records. These new updates are 'H
> From: Sherry/Support [mailto:she...@legacyfamilytree.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 11:57 AM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy file organization
>
> The New Familiy Search is just trees contributed by members... It's
> much lik
is scanned by F-Prot Antivirus ==
-Original Message-
From: Sherry/Support [mailto:she...@legacyfamilytree.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 11:57 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy file organization
The New Familiy Search is just trees contributed
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Gray"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 1:17 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy file organization
Karen,
I am non LDS, and I have a 'Family Search' account. Maybe it isn't a 'New'
Family search account, it's th
I think you have to click on the "FamilySearch Web Site" to the right of the
Sign In column, and that will take you to the allowed site for non-LDS
members. You will need to be sure you sign in at the top right of the new
window since you are registered for FamilySearch.
I've found lots of docume
e 'completed' database, with as many as needed still working Gedcoms. I
>never plan on having 2 separate DBs.
>Rich in LA CA
>
>--- On Tue, 8/2/11, Jerry wrote:
>
>> From: Jerry
>> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy file organization
>> To: LegacyUserGroup@Leg
future announcement when you will have access to
new.familysearch.org.
Close
_
From: Karen Dixon [mailto:oolig...@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 2:21 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy file organization
THE CORRECT URL FOR NEW FAMILY SEARCH IS
g yet as I am a member
of the general public.
Paul Gray
From: Karen Dixon [mailto:oolig...@comcast.net]
Sent: August-02-11 1:21 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy file organization
THE CORRECT URL FOR NEW FAMILY SEARCH IS
https://new.familysearch.org
Thanks for correcting the URL, Karen my fingers got a little twisted
Sincerely,
Sherry
Technical Support
Legacy Family Tree
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Karen Dixon wrote:
> THE CORRECT URL FOR NEW FAMILY SEARCH IS
> https://new.familysearch.org/en/action/unsec/welcome
Legacy User
THE CORRECT URL FOR NEW FAMILY SEARCH IS
https://new.familysearch.org/en/action/unsec/welcome
Then Register for the new FamilySearch
then complete the information for non members.
EVERYTHING is available to members and non members alike, except ordinance
information, available to members of the
The first will never be.
Rich in LA CA
--- On Tue, 8/2/11, Dennis M. Kowallek wrote:
> From: Dennis M. Kowallek
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy file organization
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2011, 11:33 AM
> On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 11:21:15 -0
That's a spam-type site because of the extra i in family.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Sherry/Support
wrote:
> The New Familiy Search is just trees contributed by members... It's
> much like the old IGI and best used for "clues", IMHO.
>
> If you go to new.FamiliySearch.org, you can sign up
. It contains all of the records, images, indexes, the
FamilySearch Wiki, the training aids, the library catalog and a whole lot more.
Rick Merrill
From: Dennis M. Kowallek
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2011 1:33 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy file
ng Gedcoms. I never
plan on having 2 separate DBs.
Rich in LA CA
--- On Tue, 8/2/11, Jerry wrote:
> From: Jerry
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy file organization
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2011, 10:18 AM
> Thanks for your previous comment
>
<>
I think it is much more than that. There are many extracted records,
most of which are also in FamilySearch.org, but in nFS many of them are
already linked. And while there are newbie and mistake prone entries in
nFS, there are also excellent family trees contributed by non-LDS as
well as membe
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 11:56:58 -0700, "Sherry/Support"
wrote:
>The New Familiy Search is just trees contributed by members... It's
>much like the old IGI and best used for "clues", IMHO.
OK. I just wanted to make sure I am using the term correctly.
https://www.familysearch.org/ can also be consider
<>
FAmilySearch.org is the repository of the massive indexing process that
is going on now. Millions of records are being added.
New.FamilySearch.org is where the collected and linked record are. It is
now open for some non-LDS. I would like to hear from some non-LDS who
have access to nFS. My im
The New Familiy Search is just trees contributed by members... It's
much like the old IGI and best used for "clues", IMHO.
If you go to new.FamiliySearch.org, you can sign up to get on the list
for a non-member log-in. The only thing you'll not see once you get
your log-in is the ordinance data f
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 11:21:15 -0700, "David C Abernathy"
wrote:
>That is true, but if one can NOT access the NewFamilySearch what good does it
>do me?
>The OLD Family Search has some good information, but the real stuff is in the
>NEW area.
Can someone clarify? Is the "NewFamilySearch" just the
[mailto:spa...@xmission.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 10:29 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy file organization
On 8/2/2011 9:24 AM, David C Abernathy wrote:
> At this time, since FamilySearch is for LDS members only I do NOT waste
> my time with the
I am not LDS. Familysearch.org is a fantastic site. I use it consistently.
Kay Fordham
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Rosenlof"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy file organization
On 8/2/2011 9:24 AM, David C Abernathy wrote:
>
On 02/08/2011 16:24, David C Abernathy wrote:
> At this time, since FamilySearch is for LDS members only I do NOT waste
> my time with them.
I think you are confusing new.familysearch.org (nFS) with familysearch.org.
The latter is open to the general public and is a hugely valuable
resource. If
On 8/2/2011 9:24 AM, David C Abernathy wrote:
> At this time, since FamilySearch is for LDS members only I do NOT waste
> my time with them.
To bad you feel that way. There is new data added on a regular basis. Go
to www.familysearch.org
Down on the left you can select "All Record Collections"
ecause of the size.
> Rich jn LACA
> -- On *Tue, 8/2/11, d /iamdad25@gmail. <mailto:iamdad25@gmail.>/* wrote:
>
>
> From: d
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Legacy file organization
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2011, 8:05 A
use of the size.Rich jn LACA -- On Tue,
8/2/11, d iamdad25@gmail. wrote:
From: d
Subject: [LegacyUG] Legacy file organization
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2011, 8:05 AM
I need advice on how to organize my
Legacy files.
I am thinking, for example, that I
should hav
I feel the same way Dennis. Only after I've imported the data into a
new Family File and reviewed it and cleaned it up, then will I do
selective importing using Split Screen Drag and Drop.
There's an awful lot of junk out there!
Sincerely,
Sherry
Technical Support
Legacy Family Tree
On Tue, A
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 09:17:39 -0700, "Sherry/Support"
wrote:
>Better yet is to add the AutoSource to all fields with incoming
>information - that way you know specifically what was imported through
>that gedcom as a trail for reliability of source information.
>
>Just adding to the Unspecified fiel
Better yet is to add the AutoSource to all fields with incoming
information - that way you know specifically what was imported through
that gedcom as a trail for reliability of source information.
Just adding to the Unspecified field only shows that you received
*something* in that gedcom but it d
entered folder. So an example path would look like this if :
genealogy/sources/paternal/strong/entered.
Hope this gave you some ideas.
Russ Strong
From: d
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 11:05 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Legacy file organization
I need advice on how to
I need advice on how to organize my Legacy files.
I am thinking, for example, that I should have one file with my wife's lines
and another with my lines. But then, what do I do when I want to show the
pedigree for my children? I also think that I might want different files for
active research da
35 matches
Mail list logo
