Re: [LegacyUG] Short survey: Location vs. Address

2012-02-27 Thread Paula Ryburn
] Short survey: Location vs. Address I can answer some of this but haven't used it much because I just read about the address feature. Before I used to add it in front of the Location and recently read that was wrong and messed up reports, so they offered the address feature. The one problem I see

[LegacyUG] Short survey: Location vs. Address

2012-02-25 Thread Paula Ryburn
I have read and participated in probably every thread we've had here about where to put addresses -- in the Location list or in the Address list -- and I still cannot decide. (possibly just TMI--too much information--?) If you have a moment today, could you please reply (off-line if you'd prefer)

RE: [LegacyUG] Short survey: Location vs. Address

2012-02-25 Thread Michele Lewis
Here are my answers... 1. If you use addresses at all, do you include them in the Location list or keep them separate in the Address list? If this a CURRENT address of a relative then I keep it in the address list. If this is someone in the past that is dead and gone I put it as a

Re: [LegacyUG] Short survey: Location vs. Address

2012-02-25 Thread Marg Strong
survey: Location vs. Address I have read and participated in probably every thread we've had here about where to put addresses -- in the Location list or in the Address list -- and I still cannot decide.  (possibly just TMI--too much information--?)   If you have a moment today, could you please

[LegacyUG] Short survey: Location vs. Address

2012-02-25 Thread Tony Rolfe
To answer your questions 1. I put everything in the location. Probably my most extreme case is Plot no, row no, section, cemetery name, street no, street name, city name, county name, country name. I don't put anything in the address fields. I also don't use the double comma convention to