On 2010-12-23 04:14, Anthony wrote:
I guess... Isn't Bing supposed to be coming out with a more clear
license? This would be one point for them to clarify.
Good point. I think the discussion here on the mail list is not leading
to a clear license because we all are just interpreting and gues
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Andreas Perstinger
wrote:
> On 2010-12-22 01:24, Anthony wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Frederik Ramm
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> This rule means that everything that is traced from Bing before OSM stops
>>> publishing under CC-BY-SA will be available to th
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> That's another area wide open to discussion; my interpretation of "I
> consider my contributions PD" has always been: "I don't claim any rights in
> what I contribute." - not: "I vouch for nobody holding any rights in what I
> contribute." (
Hi,
Ian Sergeant wrote:
So, the question is, when MegaMap adopt OSM maps, which are generated from
Bing traces, what will Microsoft think then? Do they really understand
what allowing contributions to OSM means?
This leads us to the terrain of who determines what megacorps "think" or
"unders
On 22 December 2010 15:18, Niklas Cholmkvist wrote:
> Anthony wrote:
>> > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Frederik Ramm
>> wrote:
>> >> This rule means that everything that is traced from Bing before OSM
>> stops
>> >> publishing under CC-BY-SA will be available to the world, forever,
>> under
frede...@remote.org wrote:
> I am sure that Microsoft
> has allowed data to be traced for OSM; I don't believe it is their
> intent to allow tracing of data for other purposes
So, the question is, when MegaMap adopt OSM maps, which are generated from
Bing traces, what will Microsoft think then?
On 2010-12-22 01:24, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
This rule means that everything that is traced from Bing before OSM stops
publishing under CC-BY-SA will be available to the world, forever, under
CC-BY-SA. But a hypothetical CC-BY-SA fork would not be a
On 23 December 2010 00:42, Anthony wrote:
> This interpretation (or at least, the acceptance of it as something
> OSM would want to do) is truly evil. I only wonder how widespread it
> is among OSM contributors. I hope in good faith that it is held by
> very few.
After turning the vote of OSM-F
>> > I certainly didn't read it that way. The Bing license says you must
>> > contribute traced data to openstreetmaps.org, but it doesn't say you
>> > can't also contribute traced data to a fork.
> After it has been contributed to openstreetmap.org, one can get it from
> openstreetmap.org(dump m
Anthony wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Frederik Ramm
> wrote:
> >> This rule means that everything that is traced from Bing before OSM
> stops
> >> publishing under CC-BY-SA will be available to the world, forever,
> under
> >> CC-BY-SA. But a hypothetical CC-BY-SA fork would not be
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 2:17 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> I believe you could also do other things with traced data but that would
> then be subject to the normal license, not the special license they granted
> to OpenStreetMap.
And how do believe they achieve that? Through copyright law? Through
11 matches
Mail list logo
