On 30/01/12 23:41, LM_1 wrote:
...
That said there are other ways to ensure the goal of this suggestion -
seamless transition rather than deletions and angry/leaving
contributors.
One that comes to my mind and does not require any drastic changes
would utilise filtering feature of JOSM (and
On 30 January 2012 15:21, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
(I thought it is i-i+j, at least in JOSM it was up to some point)
It is. But it's very difficult to extract that with certainty from a
non-trivial changeset. Add enough splits, and you may find
andrzej zaborowski schrieb:
I'm not sure if I would have joined OSM in the first place if it had
not used this wikipedia model at this time, same as I haven't
contributed (more than bug reports) to FSF or Mozilla owned projects.
Interesting to see Mozilla mentioned here as clearly every
Mike Dupont schrieb:
This is my understanding. all of my edits belong to me, they are my
contributions that I then willingly share with others.
This is exactly what the CTs say. You sign there that you own your edit
and grant the OSMF to sub-license it if needed and under well-defined terms.
Hi Robert,
On 31 January 2012 21:53, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote:
andrzej zaborowski schrieb:
I'm not sure if I would have joined OSM in the first place if it had
not used this wikipedia model at this time, same as I haven't
contributed (more than bug reports) to FSF or Mozilla owned
Generally there should be less incompatible data every day, however
there still some imports of non-copyrightable (PD, government
licensed) that were uploaded by users who did not agree to CT. Because
of this the incompatibility test would have to be re-run periodically.
(and maybe if some
