Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Travel Channel + OSM

2015-02-25 Thread Simon Poole
If they want "we won't sue you" reassurance the proper place to ask is legal-questi...@osmfoundation.org (which is simply a more manageable conduit to the LWG than le...@osmfoundation.org). http://osmfoundation.org/wiki/License#How_should_I_attribute_you.3F covers video, as outlined there they don

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Travel Channel + OSM

2015-02-25 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-02-25 9:51 GMT+01:00 Simon Poole : > If they want "we won't sue you" reassurance the proper place to ask is > legal-questi...@osmfoundation.org > out of curiosity, how many people have been sued in the past 11 years of OpenStreetMap? ;-) cheers, Martin _

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Travel Channel + OSM

2015-02-25 Thread Tobias Knerr
On 25.02.2015 09:51, Simon Poole wrote: > http://osmfoundation.org/wiki/License#How_should_I_attribute_you.3F > covers video, as outlined there they don't have to show attribution on > screen the whole time, doing something when a/the map is first > shown would likely be enough. Who is behind thes

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Travel Channel + OSM

2015-02-25 Thread Simon Poole
Am 25.02.2015 um 10:30 schrieb Tobias Knerr: > On 25.02.2015 09:51, Simon Poole wrote: >> http://osmfoundation.org/wiki/License#How_should_I_attribute_you.3F >> covers video, as outlined there they don't have to show attribution on >> screen the whole time, doing something when a/the map is first

[OSM-legal-talk] Confusion about Pins, Trivial Matching, and Collective Databases

2015-02-25 Thread Ben
I could use more clarification, I keep reading what seem to be conflicting or nuanced positions. What We Want to Do I want to generate a map for a company intranet site showing a client where his vehicles are currently based on lat/long coordinates (given to us by our proprietary mobile app which

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Confusion about Pins, Trivial Matching, and Collective Databases

2015-02-25 Thread Simon Poole
Am 25.02.2015 um 19:21 schrieb Ben: > I could use more clarification, I keep reading what seem to be > conflicting or nuanced positions. You are confusing layman answers, potentially coloured by personal preferences (licence discussion often tend to border on the religious), with legal advice. >