MJ Ray wrote:
> Doesn't being a criminal act mean that the state can investigate (and
> prosecute) without waiting for OSMF's lawyers to act?
Yes. I apologize for mis-emphasizing this. I'd still say it's a
vanishingly small threat, although one that should be made to vanish
through a clear statem
Rob Myers wrote:
> MJ Ray wrote:
> > As I understand it, once the trademark registration is confirmed (no
> > matter who to), unauthorised commercial use of the mark becomes a
> > criminal act punishable by unlimited fines and up to 10 years prison.
> > Has a written license been granted, or are y
Rob Myers wrote:
>Sent: 26 January 2009 9:58 PM
>To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
>Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] 23rd Dec board meeting
>
>MJ Ray wrote:
>
>> As I understand it, once the trademark registration is confirmed (no
>> matter who to), unauthori
MJ Ray wrote:
> As I understand it, once the trademark registration is confirmed (no
> matter who to), unauthorised commercial use of the mark becomes a
> criminal act punishable by unlimited fines and up to 10 years prison.
> Has a written license been granted, or are you expecting people not to
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Peter Miller
wrote:
> I note that "Steve [is] reluctant to publish publicly as it would invite
> another round of changes ... Henk asked about getting support from major
> contributors. Nick and Andy felt it was against the spirit of the project to
> treat some
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Peter Miller
wrote:
> Technical - Tile serving, API restrictions & Servers
> I am still not clear that there is a need for API restrictions and what
> reduction in bandwidth costs would result. What are the predicted costs of
> continuing the current arrangement?
On 25 Jan 2009, at 12:12, SteveC wrote:
>
> On 24 Jan 2009, at 21:09, Peter Miller wrote:
>> "Depending upon the precise circumstances this duty not to accept
>> benefits could be relevant in the case of the Foundation. Presumably
>> Steve Coast Will receive some form of benefit from his other co
On 24 Jan 2009, at 21:09, Peter Miller wrote:
> "Depending upon the precise circumstances this duty not to accept
> benefits could be relevant in the case of the Foundation. Presumably
> Steve Coast Will receive some form of benefit from his other company
> which could be argued to arise as
On 24 Jan 2009, at 20:26, Grant Slater wrote:
Liz wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Dair Grant wrote:
You argue that anyone with a commercial interest in OSM (e.g., me)
who's
listed on the {{PD-user}} page (me again) has a potential conflict
of
interest.
That's the way Australian law works.
Liz wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Dair Grant wrote:
>
>> You argue that anyone with a commercial interest in OSM (e.g., me) who's
>> listed on the {{PD-user}} page (me again) has a potential conflict of
>> interest.
>>
>
> That's the way Australian law works.
> If I am on a Board (which I a
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Dair Grant wrote:
> You argue that anyone with a commercial interest in OSM (e.g., me) who's
> listed on the {{PD-user}} page (me again) has a potential conflict of
> interest.
That's the way Australian law works.
If I am on a Board (which I am) and some other aspect of my lif
On 24 Jan 2009, at 13:11, Dair Grant wrote:
> Peter Miller wrote:
>
>> Is there not a large potential conflict of interest between SteveC
>> in relation
>> to his driving this change within the Foundation and also being a
>> director of
>> a company that could well benefit from the OSM projec
Peter Miller wrote:
> Is there not a large potential conflict of interest between SteveC in relation
> to his driving this change within the Foundation and also being a director of
> a company that could well benefit from the OSM project not offering a full set
> of services? I don't know, but I c
Comments on the minutes of the 23rd Dec board meeting
It is good that the minutes are now posted. I was however disappointed
to get them the day of the next meeting and a month after the meeting
in question.
It is good to see that the November minutes have been approved.
Sub-working groups
14 matches
Mail list logo
