I just posted a writeup on my diary on how we're attributing OpenStreetMap
at Mapbox. Like many have said here it goes all back to driving potential
new mappers to the map:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lxbarth/diary/21769
The recent discussion about attribution here on this list and on IRC m
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Alex Barth wrote:
> I just posted a writeup on my diary on how we're attributing OpenStreetMap
> at Mapbox.
[ ... ]
[ and from the blog ]
> (c) Mapbox (c) OpenStreetMap links to https://www.mapbox.com/about/maps with
> a full listing of all sources.
[ ... ]
> Loo
2014-04-30 20:48 GMT+02:00 Richard Weait :
> I feel that the attribution that you currently use provides
> insufficient recognition for OpenStreetMap.
>
there was also a discussion one year ago on a similar topic (attribution by
an icon instead by a text) to which I'd like to point:
https://list
Richard Weait writes:
> I feel that the attribution that you currently use provides
> insufficient recognition for OpenStreetMap.
Do you feel that the attribution page should provide better recognition for
OSM that for the other data providers? OSM data is probably the biggest data
source worl
Am 03.05.2014 19:34, schrieb Jukka Rahkonen:
> Do you feel that the attribution page should provide better recognition for
> OSM that for the other data providers? OSM data is probably the biggest data
> source worldwide so it could be reasonable. However, in Finland and Norway,
> for example, MapB
