tim wrote:
Sent: 04 February 2008 11:32 AM
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Progressing OSM to a new data Licence regime
Hello,
Few clarifications and questions about use cases.
If I distribute web mapping of my special company data and OSM, I
don't have
Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why, exactly, does CC recommend CC0 even after they have thoroughly
looked at our situation, and on what basis does the OSMF board reject
the CC suggestion?
Please cross-post any such explanation/links to legal-talk.
I wish you luck on this, but
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I distribute web mapping of my special company data and OSM, I
don't have to give my data back to OSM, right? In other words, there's
no requirement to distribute, but also, if the map images are
distributed, then it doesn't
Quoting Richard Fairhurst [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OSMF disagrees significantly with this assessment of a contractual
approach. Commercial geodata (TeleAtlas, Navteq etc.) is protected
this way.
Has this been tested in court though? Or has anything equivalent to
this been tested in court?
We
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...]
This is Parallel Distribution. We (the cc-licences mailing list)
discussed it during the CC 3.0 public review. My personal opinion is
that it is not a good idea because there is so much room for mischief
in it.
If you think it's a bad idea for another
