Re: Leo vs org mode

OK thanks. It seems I wasn't running fast enough On Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 12:33:59 AM UTC+11, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 5:42 AM, lewis > wrote: > >> I checked all the TOC headings to ensure headings/tiles are matching. A >> user may

Re: Leo vs org mode

> > A good table editor would be nice, it should read/write from > markdown/rst/latex/html. I suspect there's been at least one iteration of > such a thing, in the distant past. If I had an urgent need to edit tables > in Leo, I'd probably edit them in the richtext plugin (CKEditor) and

Re: Leo vs org mode

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 5:42 AM, lewis wrote: > I checked all the TOC headings to ensure headings/tiles are matching. A > user may find it annoying if the the link says "A brief summary of Leo" but > the title at that page says "Preface" > ​Did you reload the page? I

Re: Leo vs org mode

I checked all the TOC headings to ensure headings/tiles are matching. A user may find it annoying if the the link says "A brief summary of Leo" but the title at that page says "Preface" This occurs at http://leoeditor.com/leo_toc.html > http://leoeditor.com/preface.html Regards Lewis On

Re: Leo vs org mode

On Thursday, February 16, 2017 at 3:47:01 PM UTC-6, Edward K. Ream wrote: Leo has its own strengths:...There may be more ;-) > I forgot @command, @button, @test. I have just rediscovered Leo's preface , which is pretty much a repeat of Leo's strengths. This

Re: Leo vs org mode

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 4:22 PM, 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor < leo-editor@googlegroups.com> wrote: > I guess I wonder which tasks can currently only be accomplished with org > mode, and not Leo. > > I thought Leo had recently acquired support for multiple source > languages

Re: Leo vs org mode

I guess I wonder which tasks can currently only be accomplished with org mode, and not Leo. I thought Leo had recently acquired support for multiple source languages?  Or are you talking about executing, not syntax highlighting? A good table editor would be nice, it should read/write from

Leo vs org mode

A brief comparison of Leo and org mode. Org mode has these strengths: - Drawers: visible, pure text, easily extensible uA's. - Agendas and tables. - In-pane rendering of Latex and special symbols. - Support for multiple source languages, including shell scripts, C, etc. - Code blocks

Re: Leo and Org-Mode

On Thursday, August 14, 2014 5:49:06 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote: When importing an org-mode file the @auto-org-mode directive does not get inserted automatically. However, without having it, the original org-mode-file is written in a way that makes it unusable for Emacs. So one

Leo and Org-Mode

Hi, Today I managed to import, modify and write within Leo an org-mode file I had previously created with Emacs. I must say that I'm impressed. Great work! When importing an org-mode file the @auto-org-mode directive does not get inserted automatically. However, without having

Re: Leo and Org-Mode

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Christoph rho...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Today I managed to import, modify and write within Leo an org-mode file I had previously created with Emacs. I must say that I'm impressed. Great work! Thanks. When importing an org-mode file the @auto-org-mode

Leo vs org mode

Org mode is kinda like Leo for Emacs: http://orgmode.org/manual/index.html As a result of convergent evolution it has many of Leo's features: - Outline commands: http://orgmode.org/manual/Structure-editing.html#Structure-editing - To-do lists: