Re: Glibc-2.3.6 sys/kd.h patch

2006-04-04 Thread Jeremy Byron
DJ Lucas wrote: > The glibc version in current LFS causes a build failure when compiling > xorg-6.9 and xorg-server-1.0.{1,2}. linux/types.h cannot be included > after sys/kd.h. The glibc-2.3.6-linux_types-1.patch just committed to > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/downloads/glibc/glibc

Glibc-2.3.6 sys/kd.h patch

2006-04-04 Thread DJ Lucas
The glibc version in current LFS causes a build failure when compiling xorg-6.9 and xorg-server-1.0.{1,2}. linux/types.h cannot be included after sys/kd.h. The glibc-2.3.6-linux_types-1.patch just committed to patches (taken from glibc cvs commit) should fix the problem. I have not verified

Re: [udev_update] udev bootscript nitpicks

2006-04-04 Thread DJ Lucas
Dan Nicholson wrote: DJ, A couple small problems with the 20060402 udev bootscript. First, since you moved the wait_for_uevents() function inline, it has to fail with an exit rather than a return. Second, smaller niggle, is that you reverted someone's changes renaming "hotplug events" to "ueve

Re: Xorg 7 - various comments

2006-04-04 Thread Andrew Benton
Dan Nicholson wrote: I don't know what other packages use it, but it does locale conversion for xterm. This works flawlessly (as far as I can tell) for UTF-8 locales. I get proper character display for all the locales I tried (like ja_JP.UTF-8) in UTF-8. Working on this ticket (http://wiki.lin

Re: merging and consolidating

2006-04-04 Thread Archaic
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 12:25:22PM -0600, Jeremy Herbison wrote: > > > Why not merge alpha into udev_branch, then just replace svn with > udev_branch? It doesn't gain us anything, plus it keeps us from being able to revert either of the 2 unique changes in trunk itself (which is where reverting w

RE: merging and consolidating

2006-04-04 Thread Jeremy Herbison
> > Dan Nicholson wrote: > > To finish this thought, alpha will touch a lot of files once Chris' > > dependency info goes in. The build commands are essentially the same > > except one change in perl. However, I think only chapters 5 and 6 are > > the only files affected, so there may not be tha

Re: merging and consolidating

2006-04-04 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Dan Nicholson wrote: To finish this thought, alpha will touch a lot of files once Chris' dependency info goes in. The build commands are essentially the same except one change in perl. However, I think only chapters 5 and 6 are the only files affected, so there may not be that many conflicts.

Re: merging and consolidating

2006-04-04 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 4/4/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/4/06, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Archaic wrote: > > > It will be chock full of > > > conflicts after alpha merges. :) > > > > I don't see why there should be many conflicts. Udev_update doesn't > > touch that many files

Re: merging and consolidating

2006-04-04 Thread Archaic
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 11:11:44AM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > > I just diffed trunk to udev_update the other day when I decided to > "convert" my system to udev_update for the reasons mentioned in > blfs-book about HAL. The files are, basically But udev_update will not be merging to what is c

Re: merging and consolidating

2006-04-04 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 4/4/06, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Archaic wrote: > > It will be chock full of > > conflicts after alpha merges. :) > > I don't see why there should be many conflicts. Udev_update doesn't > touch that many files, IIRC. I just diffed trunk to udev_update the other day when I d

Re: Xorg 7 - various comments

2006-04-04 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 4/4/06, Andrew Benton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris Staub wrote: > > 5. At exactly what point is luit supposed to be installed? > > luit is optional. You don't have to install it. What does it do? I don't know what other packages use it, but it does locale conversion for xterm. This works

Re: merging and consolidating

2006-04-04 Thread Matthew Burgess
Archaic wrote: It will be chock full of conflicts after alpha merges. :) I don't see why there should be many conflicts. Udev_update doesn't touch that many files, IIRC. Regardless, I completely agree that it's time the two branches got merged. Sadly, I'm unlikely to be able to take part

Re: Xorg 7 - various comments

2006-04-04 Thread Andrew Benton
Chris Staub wrote: 5. At exactly what point is luit supposed to be installed? luit is optional. You don't have to install it. What does it do? Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information

Re: merging and consolidating

2006-04-04 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Archaic wrote: On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 09:29:48AM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: Say the word, and I'll start firing off the builds later this week. the word. :) However, any builds I do would be alphabetical+udev_update. Yeah, that was my intention. :) I really don't look forward to the actu

Re: merging and consolidating

2006-04-04 Thread Archaic
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 09:29:48AM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > > Say the word, and I'll start firing off the builds later this week. the word. :) > However, any builds I do would be alphabetical+udev_update. Yeah, that was my intention. :) I really don't look forward to the actual process o

Re: merging and consolidating

2006-04-04 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 4/4/06, Archaic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Short of ICA results, are there any specific reasons why > udev_update should not be merged into trunk in the next week or two? Say the word, and I'll start firing off the builds later this week. However, any builds I do would be alphabetical+udev_

Re: merging and consolidating

2006-04-04 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Archaic wrote: Due to all the ICA testing on the alpha branch, I think it is time to fold that branch into trunk. Are there any specific reasons why this should not be done now? No, not really. It's been ready for a while, save that we were trying to get all dependency information included as

merging and consolidating

2006-04-04 Thread Archaic
Due to all the ICA testing on the alpha branch, I think it is time to fold that branch into trunk. Are there any specific reasons why this should not be done now? Following that, I also think it is time to fold udev_update into trunk and I would welcome some ICA results before that happens. While

[udev_update] udev bootscript nitpicks

2006-04-04 Thread Dan Nicholson
DJ, A couple small problems with the 20060402 udev bootscript. First, since you moved the wait_for_uevents() function inline, it has to fail with an exit rather than a return. Second, smaller niggle, is that you reverted someone's changes renaming "hotplug events" to "uevents." Attached is a di

Re: the story on udevtrigger?

2006-04-04 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 4/3/06, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If this doesn't sound like a big task for you, could you please find the > minimum > possible magic number to be used instead of "60" without causing leaks on > your > system? I've now gotten my USB stick out of it's packaging and

Re: Book Rendering

2006-04-04 Thread Archaic
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 10:37:20PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > Would you please post a diff to the current Makfile. Thanks. Posted to blfs-dev. -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs --