Nathan Coulson wrote:
> BTW, one thought that I've been having in my setup, is using /usr/lib
> for 64bit, and /usr/lib/32 for 32bit [and /usr/lib/32/bin for
> things like ncurses-config].
Interesting idea, but (as you note) it isn't standardized. This means
your dynamic linker will not be in th
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Jeremy Huntwork
wrote:
> Nathan Coulson wrote:
>> I have been using a modified LFS (built for 32/64bit at the same time)
>> and it worked well until the latest changes were introduced to trunk
>> (that use the -B flag). Specifically GCC pass2 does not find crt0.o
Nathan Coulson wrote:
> I have been using a modified LFS (built for 32/64bit at the same time)
> and it worked well until the latest changes were introduced to trunk
> (that use the -B flag). Specifically GCC pass2 does not find crt0.o
> 32bit (just see's the 64bit). I was curious if this is what
I have been using a modified LFS (built for 32/64bit at the same time)
and it worked well until the latest changes were introduced to trunk
(that use the -B flag). Specifically GCC pass2 does not find crt0.o
32bit (just see's the 64bit). I was curious if this is what the
buildsystem that 7.0 is g
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 2:06 AM, Greg Schafer wrote:
> A mainstream build method suitable for a project like LFS needs to be
> simple, clean, robust and (sorry to be blunt) reasonably idiot-proof.
I didn't know LFSers were idiots! Thanks.
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:tus...@linuxfromscratch.or
