Randy McMurchy([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 06:06:24PM -0500:
Ag Hatzim wrote these words on 04/09/06 17:56 CST:
I would like to say,with all the respect ... Freeze the damn thing and
both teams
be ready for a release :)
Probably working a testing branch for a few weeks
Hi.
First sorry if it is already known.
Every link to patches points to
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/alphabetical/
which (the location) it doesn't exist.
Since the patches to the alphabetical branch are identical with
trunk,is just a simple change to general.ent.
sed -i
Dan Nicholson([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 11:56:09PM -0800:
Ag,
Is the patch you submitted just against current CVS? Seems like the
most changes are in login.c. Not that that's wrong. Just curious.
Sorry for the delay,Dan.
Yes,i was working with the current cvs tree.
Dan Nicholson([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 12:49:19PM -0800:
Maybe someone should pull the CVS and build it to see if this issue is
resolved.
Pulling the source from cvs,fixed the su issue.
(~/LBFS/build_dir/shadow)su -c touch /something
Password:
(~/LBFS/build_dir/shadow)ls /
Archaic([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 03:54:37PM -0700:
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 02:48:57PM -0700, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
Maybe someone should pull the CVS and build it to see if this issue is
resolved.
Depending on the outcome of this testing, we'll want to discuss now if
Jeremy Huntwork([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 11:48:07PM -0500:
Hi Jeremy.
Hi Randy.
I wrote it once and i will write it again.
I hate when people leave.
Jeremy I will miss Randy.
Randy I will miss Jeremy.
Some(rare)times i wished to have a magic stick to go back in time,and to
Ops.
Forgive me,to reply to myself here,but i think our life despairingly needs
little clowns like me so feel free to treat me like this (not that i care
much actually).
There is a major bug in my previous mail (i targeted the wrong will's spot).
My invisible master Don Carlos most probably will
Chris Staub([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 11:41:51AM -0500:
Archaic wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 01:48:32PM -0500, Chris Staub wrote:
Note: I am not saying I am absolutely against UTF-8 support being the
default (haven't really decided yet). I'm just tired of hearing this
you
Jeremy Huntwork([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 05:52:37PM -0500:
Richard A Downing wrote:
To undertake a project, as the world's derivation indicates, means to
cast an idea out ahead of oneself so that it gains autonomy and is
fulfilled not only by the efforts of its originator
Alexander E. Patrakov([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 11:45:50AM +0500:
Chris Staub wrote:
I don't think anyone is debating that they aren't being forced to use
UTF-8 locales. However, the issue is that if you never do use a UTF-8
locale, then the UTF-8 code just sits there
Richard A Downing([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 05:10:12PM +:
On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 10:37:32 -0600
Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to announce Andy Benton as a new BLFS Editor. Andy has
been a long time participant in the BLFS project and brings a lot of
Ag Hatzim([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 07:33:07PM +0200:
Richard A Downing([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 05:10:12PM +:
On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 10:37:32 -0600
Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to announce Andy Benton as a new BLFS Editor. Andy has
and yes this time is a daughter. :)
I don't know about you,but its the first time i fall in love with
a woman that i dint'n even see her.
Ag Hatzim wrote:
On top of that,will give to some (with a tendency to sadomaxism :)
's/sadomaxism/sadomasochism/'
Once and for all,sorry about my awfull
Matthew Burgess([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 09:44:29PM +:
Hi Matthew.
If anyone wants any other features included now's the time to get those
requests in.
I would like to propose to put reiserfsprogs,wget (with a note to rebuild
wget from blfs,for those who would like
Ag Hatzim([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:41:33AM +0200:
Randy McMurchy([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:45:09AM -0600:
In addition the build (SVN-20051127) was able to reproduce itself.
And while i had some failures whith some blfs packages with
gcc-4.0.2/glibc-2.3-5
Jeremy Huntwork([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:09:34AM -0500:
Ag Hatzim wrote:
Matthew Burgess([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at
09:44:29PM +:
Hi Matthew.
If anyone wants any other features included now's the time to get those
requests in.
Funny how powerful
Jeremy Huntwork([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 01:09:47PM -0400:
Hi All,
I was just curious about how many have tried jhalfs at this point and
what comments they might have as to its functionality and/or usefulness.
TIA,
Hi Jeremy.
I tried a slightly modified jhalfs
Jeremy Huntwork([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 03:19:45PM -0400:
It has become clear to me, however, that I need to make a break with
LFS. It has taken over, to an extent, in my life. It have let it crowd
out time for things that should have always been more important.
Hi
Randy McMurchy([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:54:08AM -0500:
Richard A Downing wrote these words on 09/19/05 09:21 CST:
Isn't it strange how every other engineering disipline goes in for lots
of useful diagrams, but as soon as you get to the OpenSource movement
everything MUST
Jeremy Huntwork([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:30:40PM -0400:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I strongly urge the criterion number one to read:
1) If a device needs packages outside those installed by LFS or BLFS
then don't include a rule for it.
BLFS assumes the user has a base LFS
Bruce Dubbs([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 12:01:00AM -0500:
Ag Hatzim wrote:
I always was under the impression,that there is some kind of interaction
between LFS/BLFS.
We do have interaction. That was exactly the reason Matt made the post.
He wanted to get the reaction
William Harrington([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 03:30:11PM -0500:
On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 10:31:02 +1000, Greg Schafer wrote:
J?rg Billeter wrote:
Works fine out of the box.
Works for me also,but still needs the cramfs patch though.
--
Should we drop the ftp client building from inetutils,for favor of
netkit-ftp.
ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/linux/Networking/netkit/netkit-ftp-0.17.tar.gz
Currently,compiled with gcc4.0.1 without patching.
The following patches are also available.
netkit-ftp-0.17-ssl-0.2.patch
Ag Hatzim([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 08:27:25PM +0300:
Just a small correction for anyone wants to try,if you apply the
netkit-ftp-0.17-ssl-0.2.patch
compiling will fail
In addition i attach the patches for anyone is interesting.
Some from gentoo,and 2 from fedora.
I applied
Tushar Teredesai([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 05:06:02PM -0500:
On 8/20/05, Matthew Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
BTW, if there are no plans to remove inetutils, we might was well keep
the utils such as ftp and telnet that it current installs.
Randy McMurchy([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 03:52:11PM -0500:
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 08/01/05 13:33 CST:
I am now convinced that a branch for GCC4 in BLFS is not necessary.
There isn't that much that is going to be changed, and maintenance
of the branch would be a lot
Jim Gifford([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Sat, May 21, 2005 at 08:56:38PM -0700:
..
Hi.
First sorry if my post doesnt belong in this list and sorry Jim if i
hijacked your own thread ...but with the occasion of your forwarded
message,i would like to make a proposal.
Since in LFS,we dont have a
27 matches
Mail list logo
