El Martes, 7 de Junio de 2005 19:56, Archaic escribió:
from
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/testing/chapter06/revisedchroot.ht
ml
The redaction changes look fine to me.
This brought up a philosophical debate in my mind. If the book mentions
moving the sources, but then proceeds to
El Viernes, 3 de Junio de 2005 21:37, Jim Gifford escribió:
Manuel,
On behalf of the Development team, we would like to thank you for
all your hard work on standardizing the format of the XML files for the
cross-lfs book. We really appreciate it.
Thanks to you for start all that stuff
El Sábado, 28 de Mayo de 2005 07:46, Archaic escribió:
I would rather see a link in the book referring to the blfs pages as I
don't think we should be catering to such odd harware configurations.
That is no different than writing the book with the explicit goal of
being able to fully do a
El Sábado, 28 de Mayo de 2005 11:53, Matthew Burgess escribió:
Why not simply list OpenSSH/OpenSSL as host requirements then, and point
folks via a hyperlink to BLFS?
That don't seem to me very appropiate, due that aren't host requiremts, but
final system requeriments. You need
El Viernes, 27 de Mayo de 2005 16:52, Archaic escribió:
Attempts to support building where
host!=target is hints territory as there are just too many variables for
a linear based book to contend with.
That's also my point.
In resumen:
Cross-build techniques are good.
To reboot using the
El Viernes, 27 de Mayo de 2005 21:08, Jim Gifford escribió:
http://documents.jg555.com/cross-lfs/x86/reboot/whatnext.html,
Object not found
But reading the XML file, that look sensible to me. Thanks.
--
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
El Jueves, 26 de Mayo de 2005 22:11, Archaic escribió:
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 04:05:41PM -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
After spending some time on the reboot section, I think it's a mistake
to include any of that extra stuff in the book. Esp. when it still seems
that more will be taking
Hi!
I'm thinking to start soon the following XML changes on the cross-tools
branch, if there is no complaints:
.- Sources indentation. Like the current one in BLFS.
.- Some fixes and small changes in the tagging.
.- To add all possible XInclude tags to avoid duplicated text before to start
El Sábado, 14 de Mayo de 2005 07:36, Jim Gifford escribió:
My idea is the netboot thing. Since all the bootloaders in question will
work with NFS or TFTP booting.
Could you explain that in detail?
I'm not sure but IMHO, to can boot from net the BIOS must be configured first
to allow it, and
El Sábado, 14 de Mayo de 2005 15:43, Ken Moffat escribió:
I think I've got a third - machines that can run a 32-bit or a 64-bit
system (i.e. x86_64 or ppc64) that are currently running 32-bit (i686 or
ppc). It's easy enough to install current 32-bit LFS on them, upgrading
to multilib
El Sábado, 14 de Mayo de 2005 16:23, Jim Gifford escribió:
It depends on your setup, we would have to create a netboot floppy. Take
a look at http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Gentoo_Diskless_Install
From that page:
Booting the client
Now, just boot the client. Configure the bios and the network
El Sábado, 14 de Mayo de 2005 00:16, Archaic escribió:
As we discussed on IRC, it can still be done without any historical
loss, but it will require a lot of manual fiddling. However, as this is
a one time thing, I think we'd be shooting ourselves in the foot
researching a way to automate
El Sábado, 14 de Mayo de 2005 01:42, Archaic escribió:
Ideas? Comments? Suggestion? We need your input. Multiple perspectives
ultimately make for a better book. The above is merely my perspective
and likely does not cover all aspects needed to make a good decision.
There is some aspects that
El Viernes, 13 de Mayo de 2005 00:07, Matthew Burgess escribi:
Yeah, I thought as much. I just don't want those changes getting lost,
and I'm not quite sure how we're going to migrate the cross-lfs stuff to
trunk when we get to that stage.
I think that the migration could be done without
El Sábado, 7 de Mayo de 2005 17:45, Jeremy Huntwork escribió:
Take a look:
http://linuxfromscratch.org/~jhuntwork/editor-manual/
Many thanks for start that work :-)
--
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en castellano:
El Sábado, 7 de Mayo de 2005 19:54, Jeremy Huntwork escribió:
M.Canales.es wrote:
Many thanks for start that work :-)
No problem, I sure could use your help though ;)
Very busy now reformating the BLFS sources.
But I need to add the tags attributes use policies to explain the Index
stuff
El Viernes, 6 de Mayo de 2005 17:34, Jeremy Huntwork escribió:
Proposed setup:
multi-arch
|_Common
|
| |_Entire Book (defaults)
|
|_Arch1
|
| |_Symlinks to ../Common if nothing arch specific
| |_Arch-specific pages
|
|_Arch2 (You get the idea,
El Viernes, 6 de Mayo de 2005 20:43, Jeremy Huntwork escribió:
So, in a nutshell, my opinion is that we should do multilib as a default
for 64-bit archs with /lib and /lib64 directories.
This has not yet been decided on for the book (which is why I'm asking
this question here), so if you
El Sbado, 23 de Abril de 2005 18:04, escribi:
Yes, due an improper pattner selector in the CSS code.
That's what I figgured, but I didn't have the time to check it out.
Thae fix is easy, I have it ready.
We've got a tentative policy in the edguide. It has been updated, but
we don't wnt
El Sábado, 16 de Abril de 2005 01:14, John Gnew escribió:
What do I need to do to get this change made in LFS? (provided everyone
goes along with the change)
John Gnew
I can run glxgears having this permissions:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /dev/nvidia*
crw-rw 1 root video 195, 0
Matthew Burgess escribió en lfs.dev el Viernes, 1 de Abril de 2005 20:22:
Editors: Please *do not* commit to this branch unless:
a) It's an obvious typo/spelling mistake
b) It fixes a problem reported against the 6.1 branch either on the
mailing lists or bugzilla
c) The fix has already
301 - 321 of 321 matches
Mail list logo