Am Mittwoch, den 24.04.2019, 00:21 -0500 schrieb Bruce Dubbs via lfs-
dev:
> On 4/24/19 12:05 AM, Thomas Trepl via lfs-dev wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > just for interest/fun I build a "full featured" gcc-9 including ada
> > and all other available frontends. Note that there is a new language
> >
On 4/24/19 12:05 AM, Thomas Trepl via lfs-dev wrote:
Hi,
just for interest/fun I build a "full featured" gcc-9 including ada
and all other available frontends. Note that there is a new language
frontend for 'D' :-)
All in all, it does not look bad, what do you think?
Yes, looks pretty good.
Hi,
just for interest/fun I build a "full featured" gcc-9 including ada
and all other available frontends. Note that there is a new language
frontend for 'D' :-)
All in all, it does not look bad, what do you think?
--
Thomas
cat <<'EOF' |
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: trunk revision 270485
On 4/23/19 7:10 PM, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote:
In
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wiv2glqkp6jfqyewl1uzgwnwek9fkwp3afzbcu2lv_...@mail.gmail.com/
Linus Torvalds said:
| I absolutely abhor even the concept of building the kernel as root,
| and I think it should be actively disallowed. Our
In
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wiv2glqkp6jfqyewl1uzgwnwek9fkwp3afzbcu2lv_...@mail.gmail.com/
Linus Torvalds said:
| I absolutely abhor even the concept of building the kernel as root,
| and I think it should be actively disallowed. Our build system is
| good, but it's good as in "clever
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 08:04:29PM +0100, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 07:41:24PM +0100, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote:
> >
> > But related to that I found various posts. One mentioned using a
> > seeded random number so that builds were deterministic. Having
> >
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:18:47AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote:
> On 4/23/19 12:24 AM, Thomas Trepl via lfs-dev wrote:
> >
> > Is there a reason why we won't add that sed to the book?
>
> Inertia plus we just found out about it.
>
> sed -i 's/67]/6789]/' Configure
>
> ought to do it.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 07:41:24PM +0100, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote:
>
> But related to that I found various posts. One mentioned using a
> seeded random number so that builds were deterministic. Having
> suffered from a lack of entropy last year (on some of my machines
> with SSDs, not
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 04:50:54AM +, DJ Lucas via lfs-dev wrote:
> On 4/12/2019 7:47 AM, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
> > On 12/04/2019 12:37, DJ Lucas via lfs-dev wrote:
>
> >
> > Comparison does not work anymore because of some randomization in code
> > generation... Maybe, It could
On 4/23/19 12:24 AM, Thomas Trepl via lfs-dev wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 23.04.2019, 04:09 +0100 schrieb Ken Moffat via lfs-
dev:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:59:04PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
I was looking through my logs to identify which packages do not use
my CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS (thinking about
10 matches
Mail list logo
