On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 09:35 -0700, Paul Rogers wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 00:36 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
What you are overlooking is that doing it my way comes with when
it breaks, I get to keep all the pieces.
What a curious thing to write in a SUPPORT forum of a LINUX distribution
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 19:11 -0400, x2...@lycos.com wrote:
So Paul, what i really need to say is that if it breaks, you get to
keep the pieces but maybe, more important, if it doesn't break,
you still get to keep the pieces.
Well yes, that's true. But then, LFS is a natural path for those
On 01/06/10 01:54, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44129
Many Bothans died to bring us this information.
LOL
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
Hello
I wonder if anyone has compiled lfs-scratch 6.3, the X-window environment
Section 23 of BLFS. X Window System Environment
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/6.3/x/installing.html
The xorg-server-1.2.0 in the make I get an error:
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status,
make [4] ***
On 1 June 2010 17:45, David Expósito david.sa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
I wonder if anyone has compiled lfs-scratch 6.3, the X-window environment
Section 23 of BLFS. X Window System Environment
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/6.3/x/installing.html
The xorg-server-1.2.0 in the make
forgives
are these:
make[4]: se sale del directorio `/xc/xorg-server-1.2.0/hw/xfree86/doc'
make[4]: se ingresa al directorio `/xc/xorg-server-1.2.0/hw/xfree86'
/bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -DHAVE_XORG_CONFIG_H -DXF86PM
-Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes
hi,
thanks for your quick reply. i checked the fonts-paths and could not
find anything odd about it, neither did the xorg.0.log complain about
anything in combination with fonts.
i ended up in reinstalling freetype2 and fontconfig, what finally solved
the problem, although i have no
I have already compiled by the lfs 6.3 and wanted to install the graphical
environment and end enterder a little more and then enpezar with the 6.6 but
first I want to end this.
thanks
2010/6/1 Ken Moffat zarniwhoo...@googlemail.com
On 1 June 2010 17:45, David Expósito david.sa...@gmail.com
On 6/1/10, David Expósito david.sa...@gmail.com wrote:
/usr/lib/libXfont.so: undefined reference to `ft_isdigit'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
In newer versions of Freetype2, the ft_isdigit macro has been removed.
When building libXfont-1.2.8 in ch. 23.8 Xorg-Libraries you were supposed
David Expósito wrote:
Hello
I wonder if anyone has compiled lfs-scratch 6.3, the X-window environment
Section 23 of BLFS. X Window System Environment
There is a separate list for blfs-support. Please use that for non-lfs
issues.
-- Bruce
--
ok
2010/6/1 Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
David Expósito wrote:
Hello
I wonder if anyone has compiled lfs-scratch 6.3, the X-window
environment
Section 23 of BLFS. X Window System Environment
There is a separate list for blfs-support. Please use that for non-lfs
issues.
--
forgiveness and I noticed.
thanks
2010/6/1 David Expósito david.sa...@gmail.com
ok
2010/6/1 Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
David Expósito wrote:
Hello
I wonder if anyone has compiled lfs-scratch 6.3, the X-window
environment
Section 23 of BLFS. X Window System Environment
Others have said it: unless we can duplicate the problem somebody
faces doing things slightly different, support can be hard to provide.
As Ken wrote and I believe, most of your development team can be
expected to stay pretty close to front-line developments. As seems
indicated by the current
Your distro, your rules - but going along with that, there's the
unstated your rules, your problems. There's nothing wrong with
exploring uncharted waters, but if you sail into the middle of here be
dragons, you can't expect to stop and ask for directions...
There was a guy chained to the
Paul Rogers wrote:
As seems
indicated by the current situation, someone should adopt a QC role, and
have one system that trails, i.e. has exactly the package versions
specified in the HSR, and verifies that each version of LFS does in fact
install flawlessly with those prerequisites.
The Host System requirements may indeed be too low for LFS 6.6
Updated to the packages in LFS-6.3, known to work for LFS-6.6 Added
erratum to website.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:21:10 +0200
Tobias Vogel tobias.vo...@linux.com wrote:
hi,
thanks for your quick reply. i checked the fonts-paths and could not
find anything odd about it, neither did the xorg.0.log complain about
anything in combination with fonts.
i ended up in reinstalling
Hi all.
What happen with LFS for Alpha (not CLFS). I have try to find Kedellin, but
there nothing.
Best,
Rafa
--
Registered Linux User #471869
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information
On 1 June 2010 19:40, Paul Rogers paulgrog...@fastmail.fm wrote:
As Ken wrote and I believe, most of your development team can be
expected to stay pretty close to front-line developments. As seems
indicated by the current situation, someone should adopt a QC role, and
have one system that
On 1 June 2010 21:51, Rafael Ruiz gand...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all.
What happen with LFS for Alpha (not CLFS). I have try to find Kedellin, but
there nothing.
Best,
Rafa
Nobody has the hardware. Also, from what I can gather (particularly
my experience at clfs), building on it is very
Thanks ken.
But where I can find book and packages? These must be in anywhere.
Best,
Rafa
2010/6/1 Ken Moffat zarniwhoo...@googlemail.com
On 1 June 2010 21:51, Rafael Ruiz gand...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all.
What happen with LFS for Alpha (not CLFS). I have try to find Kedellin,
but
On 06/01/10 15:19, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Paul Rogers wrote:
As seems
indicated by the current situation, someone should adopt a QC role, and
have one system that trails, i.e. has exactly the package versions
specified in the HSR, and verifies that each version of LFS does in fact
install
Baho Utot wrote:
On 06/01/10 15:19, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Paul Rogers wrote:
As seems
indicated by the current situation, someone should adopt a QC role, and
have one system that trails, i.e. has exactly the package versions
specified in the HSR, and verifies that each version of LFS does in
On 1 June 2010 23:04, Rafael Ruiz gand...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks ken.
But where I can find book and packages? These must be in anywhere.
Kelledin appears to have dropped off the net, so no idea.
ĸen
--
After tragedy, and farce, OMG poneys!
--
On 06/01/10 18:24, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 06/01/10 15:19, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Paul Rogers wrote:
As seems
indicated by the current situation, someone should adopt a QC role, and
have one system that trails, i.e. has exactly the package versions
specified in the HSR, and
Baho Utot wrote:
The system I am using to compile this stuff is an AMD Phenom(tm) II X4
810 Processor that has 8G DDR3 memory. I use that system so I can make
mistakes really fast ;) ie things can go sour quickly and at a high rate
of speed. You usually don't get a chance to see them let
George wrote:
[...]
phase 2 -- building the system
During this phase you would actually build the system as described
in the LFS and BLFS books. The time that it would take to do
this is dependent on the speed of your build-host as well as how much
you are building. For me I
Mike McCarty wrote:
time -- 2.5 - 3 days (being generous here)
I think you are being optimistic, for the first build, anyway.
I'd put in 5 days for getting the first build up and running.
This all depends on experience. Actually I think there is a sweet spot.
Too much experience and
On 06/01/10 19:05, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
The system I am using to compile this stuff is an AMD Phenom(tm) II X4
810 Processor that has 8G DDR3 memory. I use that system so I can make
mistakes really fast ;) ie things can go sour quickly and at a high rate
of speed. You usually
Its probably been 6 years since I built lfs on my alpha, and I have not kept it
up to date, but when I built it, there were no special packages for alpha
except milo and aboot. The only differences I recall were in the building of
gcc and glibc, (you were just telling them to build for a
On 6/1/10, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
Volunteers welcomed.
I'll volunteer...I can mess up anything :)
I am going to try it again as I am a gluten for punishment.
From one punishment lubber 't another:
Consider using the HSR that are now in LFS-DEV for your testing.
The
David Expósito wrote:
I have already compiled by the lfs 6.3 and wanted to install the graphical
environment and end enterder a little more and then enpezar with the 6.6 but
This looks like automatic translation with some misspelled words.
enterder = entender = understand
enpezar = empezar ==
32 matches
Mail list logo
