Re: [lfs-support] Chapter 5 questions

2012-05-03 Thread Tony Sauri
On Thu, 03 May 2012 16:52, Scott Robertson wrote: Hello, Can someone explain what the directory structure is supposed to look like in Chapter 5? 1. Where does the Binutils folder/directory go? Where does the GCC folder go? That's all the further I have gotten so far.  I think I will

Re: [lfs-support] Chapter 5 questions

2012-05-03 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em qui, 3/5/12, Scott Robertson escreveu: De: Scott Robertson Assunto: [lfs-support] Chapter 5 questions Para: lfs-support lfs-support@... Data: Quinta-feira, 3 de Maio de 2012, 1:53 Hello, Can someone explain what the directory structure is supposed to look like in Chapter 5? 1.

Re: [lfs-support] Chapter 5 questions

2012-05-03 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Forgot to mention: You might thank Philippe Delavalade and Tony Sauri, as they are trying to be helpful with good correct information they have written to you. In the beginning, we all have these doubts, some find their own way through and this list has volunteers who are part of LFS/BLFS

Re: [lfs-support] Chapter 5 questions

2012-05-03 Thread Eleanore Boyd
On 5/3/2012 1:40 AM, Scott Robertson wrote: (snip) 2) Why are you here if you aren't going to be of any help? I'm not coming here with no experience with Linux. I've also noticed several problems with the manual, so clearly this is a work in progress. You, Tony, apparently can't even

Re: [lfs-support] Chapter 5 questions

2012-05-03 Thread Scott Robertson
Ahh, ok, yes thank you, that is more what I am looking for.   So you can have the Binutils-xx AND Binutils-build in the same /mnt/lfs/sources directory.  I know everyone disagrees with me, but I still think that isn't clear given that quote on page 35 recommending that Binutils be built outside

Re: [lfs-support] Chapter 5 questions

2012-05-03 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Please, make sure you are reading the latest stable LFS7.1: Stable LFS Errata: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/errata/stable Stable LFS: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/ Below, reproduced from General Compilation Instructions of Chapter 5, which can found in:

Re: [lfs-support] Chapter 5 questions

2012-05-03 Thread Philippe Delavalade
Le jeudi 03 mai à 15:16, Scott Robertson a écrit : Ahh, ok, yes thank you, that is more what I am looking for.   So you can have the Binutils-xx AND Binutils-build in the same /mnt/lfs/sources directory.  I know everyone disagrees with me, but I still think that isn't clear given that quote

Re: [lfs-support] Chapter 5 questions

2012-05-03 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 04:15:57PM +0200, Philippe Delavalade wrote: Le jeudi 03 mai à 15:16, Scott Robertson a écrit : So the GCC directory is similar in that it goes in /mnt/lfs/sources/GCC-4.x  is that right?   I don't think the book explicitly says it, but I guess you are supposed

Re: [lfs-support] Chapter 5 questions

2012-05-03 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Scott Robertson wrote: 1) I don't think that is true. The manual contradicts itself. On the one hand it tells you to put stuff in $LFS/tools, but then it specifically recommends NOT putting things in there during the initial compilation process. It also tells people to create an LFS

Re: [lfs-support] Chapter 5 questions

2012-05-03 Thread Scott Robertson
Hi, You are one of the main guys, right?  I think I am going to have to re-read some things. I downloaded the 7.0 PDF before 7.1 came out and actually printed it out (7.0) so I am kind of locked into 7.0 as I don't want to print out the whole 7.1, but I am trying to check it as well.  I

Re: [lfs-support] Chapter 5 questions

2012-05-03 Thread Scott Robertson
Yes, thanks for clearing that up.  The packages are (as far as I can tell) all compressed with either a bz2 or gz extension, which means they are compressed.  They are also tar'd, but it is my understanding that tar isn't a compressed format.  So I think technically they have to be uncompressed

Re: [lfs-support] Chapter 5 questions

2012-05-03 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Scott Robertson wrote: Please don't top post on the LFS lists. I started reading 7.0, and I was doing OK until about Chapter 5. Until I realized that some of my directories didn't seem right. Somehow I ended up with just a sources directory on the LFS partition. I'm not a hardened expert

Re: [lfs-support] Chapter 5 questions

2012-05-03 Thread Rick Shelton
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote: Scott Robertson wrote: I think I have a fair understanding of things, except for a few things.  As I said, I have a sources directory on the LFS partition that I created, but I don't have a /lfs/tools directory there, so

Re: [lfs-support] Chapter 5 questions

2012-05-03 Thread Tony Sauri
On Fri, 04 May 2012 01:26, Scott Robertson wrote: No hard feelings mate?  None here and no offence taken at anty time. I am really pleased to see that you now understand the directory structure and by now should be weel on the way with the Chapter 5 compiles. To give you a little forwarning