- Original Message -
From: Fernando de Oliveira
To: LFS Support List
Cc:
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 70-persistent rules
--- Em sex, 11/1/13, Mike Johnston escreveu:
> De: Mike Johnston
> Assunto: Re: [lfs-support] 70-persistent rules
- Original Message -
From: Thomas de Roo
To: Mike Johnston ; LFS Support List
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 8:14 AM
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 70-persistent rules
On 01/09/13 13:32, Mike Johnston wrote:
> From: Michael E. Maher
> To: Mike Johnston
> Cc: LFS Sup
- Original Message -
From: Michael E. Maher
To: Mike Johnston
Cc: LFS Support List
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 12:32 AM
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 70-persistent rules
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 14:40 -0800, Mike Johnston wrote:
> Any ideas from this? I really appreciate y
- Original Message -
From: Michael E. Maher
To: Mike Johnston
Cc: LFS Support List
Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 70-persistent rules
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 13:30 -0800, Mike Johnston wrote:
>
>
>
> - Original Message
- Original Message -
From: Michael E. Maher
To: Mike Johnston
Cc: LFS Support List
Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 70-persistent rules
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 13:13 -0800, Mike Johnston wrote:
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
&
- Original Message -
From: Geoff Swan
To: LFS Support List
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 70-persistent rules
On 10/01/2013 12:27 AM, Mike Johnston wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
> From: Thomas de Roo
> To: Mike Jo
- Original Message -
From: Thomas de Roo
To: Mike Johnston ; LFS Support List
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 8:14 AM
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 70-persistent rules
On 01/09/13 13:32, Mike Johnston wrote:
> From: Michael E. Maher
> To: Mike Johnston
> Cc: LFS Sup
From: Michael E. Maher
To: Mike Johnston
Cc: LFS Support List
Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 3:55 AM
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 70-persistent rules
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 11:03 -0800, Mike Johnston wrote:
> I'm using LFS 7.2 all built and is running almost fine.
>
>
>
I'm using LFS 7.2 all built and is running almost fine.
I'm trying to get multiple nics with stable names. I have the
70-persistent-net.rules file set matching on mac addresses. The problem is the
file never seems to take effect.
Any ideas what might cause this? Anything in the kernel need t
disable-fsck off the e2fsprogs configure.
Many thanks here,
Mike
From: Bruce Dubbs
To: Mike Johnston ; LFS Support List
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] e2fsprogs
Mike Johnston wrote:
> So I built util-linux-2.20.1 and
m just not sure how that can be if we didn't build them.
Just wanted to make sure as if I build without this configure option, things
seem to get built ok.
Thanks
From: Bruce Dubbs
To: LFS Support List
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] e2fsprogs
Mike Joh
Hello,
It seems the fsck programs for ext2 and ext3 don't get built in LFS 7.1. They
are explicitly not built by config for the e2fsprogs. Are they built/installed
someplace else?
Thanks
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.h
Hello,
I have just finished LFS 7.1 and have everything up and running. On bootup
however, I keep getting "/lib/lsb/init-functions: line 668 /run/var/bootlog: No
such file or directory".
This starts to happen after the message "Cleaning file systems".
The /run/var and friends are created in S00
Hello,
I'm building LFS 7.1 from the book. I'm running the tests on glib and I'm
getting a setlocale failed error in bug-regex32.
Any ideas on this ? Ok to proceed?
Thanks in advance,
Mike--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/f
. If it's not a symlink but a real file,
it doesn't regenerate and stays a fixed size.
How does it know this?
Thank againMike
--- On Sun, 8/22/10, Tobias Gasser wrote:
From: Tobias Gasser
Subject: Re: 70-persistent-net.rules
To: "LFS Support List"
Date: Sunday, Augus
Hello,I have a LFS system with a read only file system. I have
/etc/udev/rules.d a symlink to a read/write partition. The
70-persistent-net.rules file gets generated and keeps on growing for every
reboot. If i make the root filesystem read/write, this file does not get
re-generated and stays
Hi,I'm on LFS 6.3 all seems to be working fine with one exception. The
/etc/sysconfig/70-persistent-net file continues to grow with each reboot. I
have 4 NICs, all the MAC addresses are in the file correctly, they all get
assigned each boot cycle to the same eth* name. But I keep getting the
17 matches
Mail list logo
