[lfs-support] glibc

I got the following for gclibc, any ideas? make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/Chapter-5/5.7._Glibc-2.16.0/glibc-2.16.0' /mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/4.7.1/../../../../i686-lfs-linux-gnu/bin/ld: cannot find crt1.o: No such file or directory /mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/

[lfs-support] Glibc

Never mind, I just answered my own question. I remember Debian did not show Glibc as a package, and I loaded eglibc-source, but apparently it is not sufficient. Need to find Glibc-2.5.1 - maybe from another Debian repository, or compile and install it from elsewhere. This pertains to the 'make'

[lfs-support] Glibc

Greetings, I am trying to get glibc installed on my system, so I can continue/begin LFS. I get the same error from Glibc versions 2-17, and 18. //home/william/Downloads/glibc-2.18/nis/nis_file.c:42: undefined reference to `xdrstdio_create' / /collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status / /m

[lfs-support] glibc 5.7

why are the CC= AR= RANLIB= not set for glibc? as far i can understand, glibc will be built with the hosts compiler and not with the new one build in 5.5 as the new one didn't install reachable with the PATH-variable. in 5.8 binutils and 5.9 gcc will be built with the new compiler by specifying t

Re: [lfs-support] glibc

Garrett Gaston wrote: > > I got the following for gclibc, any ideas? > make[1]: Leaving directory > `/mnt/lfs/sources/Chapter-5/5.7._Glibc-2.16.0/glibc-2.16.0' > /mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/4.7.1/../../../../i686-lfs-linux-gnu/bin/ld: > cannot find crt1.o: No such file or dir

Re: [lfs-support] glibc

On 09/27/2012 06:40 PM, Garrett Gaston wrote: I got the following for gclibc, any ideas? make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/Chapter-5/5.7._Glibc-2.16.0/glibc-2.16.0' /mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/4.7.1/../../../../i686-lfs-linux-gnu/bin/ld: cannot find crt1.o: No

[lfs-support] Glibc-2.18

When compiling and testing Glibc > I've noticed in the configure line the option '--enable-kernel=2.6.32'. Why this when its a 3.10.9 kernel? I've noticed that when it installs, I kept getting a compile error on one of the checks. Changed HOSTTYPE to x86_64, and it compiles now. can you provi

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc

Le 12/01/2014 22:37, William Darryl Jackson a écrit : > Never mind, I just answered my own question. I remember Debian did not > show Glibc as a package, and I loaded eglibc-source, but apparently it > is not sufficient. Need to find Glibc-2.5.1 - maybe from another Debian > repository, or compi

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:08 AM, William Darryl Jackson < wm.djack...@comcast.net> wrote: > Greetings, > > I am trying to get glibc installed on my system, so I can continue/begin > LFS. I get the same error from Glibc versions 2-17, and 18. > > */home/william/Downloads/glibc-2.18/nis/nis_file.c:

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc

William Darryl Jackson wrote: > Greetings, > > I am trying to get glibc installed on my system, so I can continue/begin > LFS. I get the same error from Glibc versions 2-17, and 18. > > //home/william/Downloads/glibc-2.18/nis/nis_file.c:42: undefined > reference to `xdrstdio_create' / > Research s

[lfs-support] glibc 2.19

Great, glibc 2.19 is working fine. Also, the first two 'sed' lines - static and make - can be removed because those issues are resolved in the new version. I did not created any other change. Maybe have a look at the locales for the bss chain. ef2progs - due to the introduction of using a build

[lfs-support] Glibc Compile

I'm on LFS 7.0 section 5.7(Glibc-2.14.1) on Ubuntu 11.10, and am trying to compile. The configure runs fine, but after I run make I get the following error: make[1]: *** No rule to make target `/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/Versions.all', needed by `/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/abi-versions.h'. St

Re: [lfs-support] glibc 5.7

On 6/21/2012 5:57 AM, Tobias Gasser wrote: > why are the CC= AR= RANLIB= not set for glibc? > > as far i can understand, glibc will be built with the hosts compiler and > not with the new one build in 5.5 as the new one didn't install > reachable with the PATH-variable. > > in 5.8 binutils and 5.9

Re: [lfs-support] glibc 5.7

On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:57:19 +0100 Tobias Gasser wrote: > why are the CC= AR= RANLIB= not set for glibc? To quote from the glibc page http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter05/glibc.html "--host=$LFS_TGT, --build=$(../glibc-2.15/scripts/config.guess) The combined effec

Re: [lfs-support] glibc 5.7

Andrew Benton schrieb: > On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:57:19 +0100 > Tobias Gasser wrote: > >> why are the CC= AR= RANLIB= not set for glibc? > > To quote from the glibc page > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter05/glibc.html > > "--host=$LFS_TGT, --build=$(../glibc-2.15/scrip

[lfs-support] glibc chapter 6

This is what I got for the make -k check command for glibc on chapter 6 /bootparam.h sysvipc/sys/ipc.h sysvipc/sys/msg.h sysvipc/sys/sem.h sysvipc/sys/shm.h termios/termios.h termios/sys/termios.h termios/sys/ttychars.h time/time.h time/sys/time.h time/sys/timeb.h wcsmbs/wchar.h wctype/wctype.h

[lfs-support] Glibc Make Error

Hi; I try to compile glibc-2.16 version. But I'm getting following error when I execute make command: /opt/newroot/src/build/glibc-build/resolv/libresolv_pic.a(gethnamaddr.os):/opt/newroot/src/glibc-2.16.0/resolv/gethnamaddr.c:636: more undefined references to `__stack_chk_guard' follow collect2:

[lfs-support] glibc 2.16.0 (5.7)

the book copies the rpc headers to the host system. to avoid changeing the host, i use the same sed as in chapter 6 sed -e 's##"rpc/types.h"#' \ -i sunrpc/rpc_clntout.c i guess this should be changed in the book tobias -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: ht

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc-2.18

On Aug 24, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Dave wrote: > When compiling and testing Glibc > > I've noticed in the configure line the option > '--enable-kernel=2.6.32'. Why this when its a 3.10.9 kernel? Because not everyone builds hosts running a 3.10.9 kernel. Reference this: http://permalink.gmane.org/

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc-2.18

On Sat, 2013-08-24 at 12:28 -0400, Dave wrote: > When compiling and testing Glibc > > I've noticed in the configure line the option > '--enable-kernel=2.6.32'. Why this when its a 3.10.9 kernel? Short version, because it has to work with the kernel you're running during the build, not just the

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc Compile

Whats the output when you run this? cat > version-check.sh << "EOF"#!/bin/bash export LC_ALL=C # Simple script to list version numbers of critical development tools bash --version | head -n1 | cut -d" " -f2-4 echo "/bin/sh -> `readlink -f /bin/sh`" echo -n "Binutils: "; ld --version | head -n1 |

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc Compile

Austin Jones wrote: > I'm on LFS 7.0 section 5.7(Glibc-2.14.1) on Ubuntu 11.10, and am trying to > compile. The configure runs fine, but after I run make I get the following > error: > > make[1]: *** No rule to make target > `/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/Versions.all', needed by > `/mnt/lfs/source

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc Compile

On Dec 26, 2011 11:11 PM, "Bruce Dubbs" wrote: > > Austin Jones wrote: > > I'm on LFS 7.0 section 5.7(Glibc-2.14.1) on Ubuntu 11.10, and am trying to > > compile. The configure runs fine, but after I run make I get the following > > error: > > > > make[1]: *** No rule to make target > > `/mnt/lfs/

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc Compile

Also remember that /bin/sh should be a symbolic or hard link to bash, by default ubuntu uses dash. On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 8:22 PM, John Fanjoy wrote: > > On Dec 26, 2011 11:11 PM, "Bruce Dubbs" wrote: > > > > Austin Jones wrote: > > > I'm on LFS 7.0 section 5.7(Glibc-2.14.1) on Ubuntu 11.10, a

[lfs-support] glibc tests errors

I don't know how to proceed, I get the following errors when running: make -k check 2>&1 | tee glibc-check-log root:/sources/glibc-build# grep Error glibc-check-log make[1]: *** [csu/tests] Error 2 make[1]: *** [iconv/tests] Error 2 make[1]: *** [locale/tests] Error 2 make[3]: *** [/sources/glibc-

[lfs-support] Glibc snd -march option

Hello, I try to find a reason for the following statement in the book: "Because Glibc no longer supports i386, its developers say to use the compiler flag -march=i486 when building it for x86 machines." I wasn't able to find such recommendation in documentation of glibc (files README, INSTALL, F

[lfs-support] Glibc chapter 6 stuck...

root:/# DL=$(readelf -l /bin/sh | sed -n 's@.*interpret.*/tools\(.*\)]$@\1@p') bash: command substitution: line 45: syntax error near unexpected token `)' bash: command substitution: line 45: `readelf -l /bin/sh | sed -n 's@.*interpret.*/tools\(.*\)]$@\1@p')' root:/# I seem to be having a proble

[lfs-support] glibc 2.14.1 check fails

Hello,  I'm building LFS 7.1 from the book.  I'm running the tests on glib and I'm getting a setlocale failed error in bug-regex32. Any ideas on this ?  Ok to proceed? Thanks in advance, Mike-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/f

Re: [lfs-support] glibc chapter 6

On 2012-08-19 19:56, Garrett Gaston wrote: > This is what I got for the make -k check command for glibc on chapter > 6 > > /bootparam.h sysvipc/sys/ipc.h sysvipc/sys/msg.h sysvipc/sys/sem.h > sysvipc/sys/shm.h termios/termios.h termios/sys/termios.h > termios/sys/ttychars.h time/time.h time/sys/ti

Re: [lfs-support] glibc chapter 6

Garrett Gaston wrote: > This is what I got for the make -k check command for glibc on chapter 6 > /bootparam.h sysvipc/sys/ipc.h sysvipc/sys/msg.h sysvipc/sys/sem.h sysvipc/sys/shm.h termios/termios.h termios/sys/termios.h termios/sys/ttychars.h time/time.h time/sys/time.h time/sys/timeb.h wcsmb

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc Make Error

Hi; Do you have any ideas on this? Regards *Aydın Demirel -- Linux System Administrator* *Endersys Consultancy and Software Ltd.* * * 2012/9/6 Aydın Demirel > Hi; > > I try to compile glibc-2.16 version. But I'm getting following error when > I execute make command:

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc Make Error

On Sep 6, 2012, at 08:03 AM, Aydın Demirel wrote: /opt/newroot/src/build/glibc-build/resolv/libresolv_pic.a (gethnamaddr.os):/opt/newroot/src/glibc-2.16.0/resolv/gethnamaddr.c: 636: more undefined references to `__stack_chk_guard' follow Maybe you are missing some sed commands: http://www.l

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc Make Error

Hi William; 2012/9/7 William Harrington > > On Sep 6, 2012, at 08:03 AM, Aydın Demirel wrote: > > /opt/newroot/src/build/glibc-**build/resolv/libresolv_pic.a(** >> gethnamaddr.os):/opt/newroot/**src/glibc-2.16.0/resolv/**gethnamaddr.c:636: >> more undefined references to `__stack_chk_guard' fo

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc Make Error

Hi again; This is my mistake. I solved it re-compiling* gcc. * Regards 2012/9/7 Aydın Demirel > Hi William; > > > 2012/9/7 William Harrington > >> >> On Sep 6, 2012, at 08:03 AM, Aydın Demirel wrote: >> >> /opt/newroot/src/build/glibc-**build/resolv/libresolv_pic.a(** >>> gethnamaddr.os):/opt

Re: [lfs-support] glibc baho-utot

Thanks. Do you happen to know exactly what chapter/page of LFS that this symlink is created? Thanks. Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 19:05:01 -0400 From: baho-u...@columbus.rr.com To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org Subject: Re: [lfs-support] glibc On 09/27/2012 06:40 PM, Garrett

Re: [lfs-support] glibc baho-utot

Garrett Gaston wrote: > > Thanks. Do you happen to know exactly what chapter/page of > LFS that this symlink is created? Thanks. Section 4.2. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above infor

Re: [lfs-support] glibc 2.16.0 (5.7)

Tobias Gasser wrote: > > the book copies the rpc headers to the host system. to avoid changeing > the host, i use the same sed as in chapter 6 > > sed -e 's##"rpc/types.h"#' \ > -i sunrpc/rpc_clntout.c > > > i guess this should be changed in the book Possibly, but the book is really only add

Re: [lfs-support] glibc 2.16.0 (5.7)

Am 12.11.2012 19:15, schrieb Bruce Dubbs: > > Possibly, but the book is really only adding some headers to the host > system. The problem should only come up when using LFS-7.1 as a host. ok. not really a problem. except for the system requirements like {d,b}ash or {g,}awk there is no other pa

[lfs-support] glibc test failures. Acceptable?

Hello experts, I am attempting my first LFS build; which will (hopefully) be 7.4, built on a host system of slackware-14. All went well up until chapter 6. I am unsure as to whether or not the errors in the glibc fall into the acceptable variety or not. glibc appeared to build well enough. Hav

[lfs-support] glibc build in LFS7.4.

My Chapter 6 glibc check gave four errors. Three of them (getaddrinfo4, annexc and run-conformtest) are expected but the fourth in globtest is not mentioned in the book. Here is the immediate context: /bin/sh globtest.sh /sources/glibc-build/ ' /sources/glibc-build/elf/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 --libra

[lfs-support] glibc-2.14.1 compilation error

Hello all, I'm having trouble compiling glibc 2.14.1, I must mention: *Book:* 7.0 *Host distro:* Ubuntu 10.10 i386 *Host Requirements:* sh version-check.sh bash, version 4.1.5(1)-release /bin/sh -> /bin/dash Binutils: (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.20.51-system.20100908 version-check.sh: 9: bison: no

Re: [lfs-support] glibc tests errors

On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 06:13:55PM +0200, mais lfs wrote: > I don't know how to proceed, I get the following errors > when running: make -k check 2>&1 | tee glibc-check-log > > root:/sources/glibc-build# grep Error glibc-check-log > make[1]: *** [csu/tests] Error 2 > make[1]: *** [iconv/tests] Err

Re: [lfs-support] glibc tests errors

On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 06:13:55PM +0200, mais lfs wrote: > > I don't know how to proceed, I get the following errors > > when running: make -k check 2>&1 | tee glibc-check-log > > > > root:/sources/glibc-build# grep Error glibc-check-log > > ma

Re: [lfs-support] glibc tests errors

On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 07:57:49PM +0200, mais lfs wrote: > On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > > Take a look in glibc-check-log from the *host* system. > > Don't have 'less' available yet, so is using: > grep -B5 Error glibc-check-log I know you don't have less or vim i

Re: [lfs-support] glibc tests errors

On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 07:57:49PM +0200, mais lfs wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Ken Moffat > wrote: > > > > > > > > Take a look in glibc-check-log from the *host* system. > > > > Don't have 'less' available yet, so is using: > >

Re: [lfs-support] glibc tests errors

On 02/01/12 21:48, mais lfs wrote: On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Ken Moffat > wrote: On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 07:57:49PM +0200, mais lfs wrote: > On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Ken Moffat mailto:zarniwh...@ntlworld.com>> wrote: > > > > >

Re: [lfs-support] glibc tests errors

Did you do the host system requirments in chapter preface > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/7.0/prologue/hostreqs.html > > Yes, I remember I had to install bison, but something else I now remember, I later had to install autotools on the host as well because something was complaining abou

Re: [lfs-support] glibc tests errors

On Jan 2, 2012 4:00 PM, "mais lfs" wrote: > >> Did you do the host system requirments in chapter preface >> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/7.0/prologue/hostreqs.html >> > > Yes, I remember I had to install bison, but something else I now remember, > I later had to install autotools on th

Re: [lfs-support] glibc tests errors

>Doing the building two or three times can only help me understand things >better. Agreed >Anyway I wonder if anybody ever did the build right the first time, in only a >single go? I Did... But then when it booted it yelled at me in black, white and in COLOR [FAIL] [FAIL] LOL Now I'm aut

Re: [lfs-support] glibc tests errors

@Jason: that's my approach as well, just roll with the blows... (and go play GTA when I take a break - now _that's_ a lol!) I've reached install of glibc again, this time the grep error-check is: root:/sources/glibc-build# grep Error glibc-check-log make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/bug-re

Re: [lfs-support] glibc tests errors

Just a final check, I get the following result: root:/sources/glibc-build# grep 'SEARCH.*/usr/lib' dummy.log |sed 's|; |\n|g' SEARCH_DIR("/tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib64") SEARCH_DIR("/tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib") SEARCH_DIR("/usr/lib") SEARCH_DIR("/lib"); Is the *-unknown-* to be e

Re: [lfs-support] glibc tests errors

>root:/sources/glibc-build# grep 'SEARCH.*/usr/lib' dummy.log |sed 's|; |\n|g' >SEARCH_DIR("/tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib64") >SEARCH_DIR("/tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib") >SEARCH_DIR("/usr/lib") >SEARCH_DIR("/lib"); > >Is the *-unknown-* to be expected? I think that has to do with the

Re: [lfs-support] glibc tests errors

On 1/3/2012 5:24 AM, jasonps...@jegas.com wrote: >> root:/sources/glibc-build# grep 'SEARCH.*/usr/lib' dummy.log |sed 's|; |\n|g' >> SEARCH_DIR("/tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib64") >> SEARCH_DIR("/tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib") >> SEARCH_DIR("/usr/lib") >> SEARCH_DIR("/lib"); >> >> Is the

Re: [lfs-support] glibc tests errors

On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 06:19:39 -0600 Eleanore Boyd wrote: > It should say "x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu", no unknown factor. Something is > very wrong with associations, hostnames, or otherwise. No, that's not true. After the second pass of gcc in chapter 5 it says x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (or on 32 bit

[lfs-support] glibc compilation error (LFS 7.1)

hi, i'm tryng to compile the glibc packtage but return a errror (2) this is the log of configuration and compilation of packet: lfs@pandaubuntu-RF511-RF411-RF711:/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build$ case `uname -m` in i?86) echo "CFLAGS += -march=i486 -mtune=native" > configparms ;; esac lfs@pandaubuntu

[lfs-support] Glibc and -march=i486 option

Well, I try to ask it once more. Can anybody explain (or give me a link to relevant discussion) why glibc should be compiled with -march=i486 option? I remember that in LFS 5.0 it was recommended to clear CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS during compilation; but why it is recommended -march=i486 option now? --

[lfs-support] glibc pass2 make check error

wcsmbs/wchar.h wctype/wctype.h > /sources/glibc-build/begin-end-check.out make[1]: Target `check' not remade because of errors. make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/glibc-2.5.1' make: *** [check] Error 2 root:/sources/glibc-build#    what can I do  now ? go on?   Then, make install  will  error--

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc chapter 6 stuck...

Michael Robinson wrote: > root:/# DL=$(readelf -l /bin/sh | sed -n 's@.*interpret.*/tools\(.*\)]$@\1@p') > bash: command substitution: line 45: syntax error near unexpected token `)' > bash: command substitution: line 45: `readelf -l /bin/sh | sed -n > 's@.*interpret.*/tools\(.*\)]$@\1@p')' > root

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc chapter 6 stuck...

On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 20:38 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Michael Robinson wrote: > > root:/# DL=$(readelf -l /bin/sh | sed -n > > 's@.*interpret.*/tools\(.*\)]$@\1@p') > > bash: command substitution: line 45: syntax error near unexpected token `)' > > bash: command substitution: line 45: `readelf -

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc chapter 6 stuck...

Michael Robinson wrote: > On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 20:38 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Michael Robinson wrote: >>> root:/# DL=$(readelf -l /bin/sh | sed -n >>> 's@.*interpret.*/tools\(.*\)]$@\1@p') >>> bash: command substitution: line 45: syntax error near unexpected token `)' >>> bash: command substi

[lfs-support] glibc pass 2 chapter-6

I have deviated from the book just a little. Instead of just typing the commands I'M placing all the commands for each page in a script called bld and running the script. In the script I'M appending each line with && so what each line will not proceed unless the previous line succeeded, in addi

[lfs-support] glibc-2.16.0 configure error - relro

Hello In chapter 5.7 I get an error running configure. The script stop with following message: checking for -z relro option... no configure: error: linker with -z relro support required See complete output from configure in the end of this mail. I have also uploaded config.log to http://sejlga

[lfs-support] glibc --enable-kernel=2.6.25? why?

Hi, all: Refer to http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/glibc.html glibc-2.16.0 configuration, the version of enabled kernel *--enable-kernel=2.6.25 \* Does this refer to the installed kernel? Should 2.6.25 be the same as the Linux kernel vers

[lfs-support] Glibc-2.18 Test Suite Failed

In fact, I don't think it conducted any tests. The commands I use in the glibc-build directory come right out of the book make -k check 2>&1 | tee glibc-check-log grep Error glibc-check-log I do call them from a function defined in a build.conf file called check_commands, but that shouldn't m

Re: [lfs-support] glibc test failures. Acceptable?

Le 28/10/2013 14:07, Richard a écrit : > [...] > > Any advice would be welcome. I cannot tell you much about what the tests. Are you sure they did not run to completion? > > I am also assuming that glibc is one of the packages that can safely be > installed to a fake root - then tarballed 'slackw

Re: [lfs-support] glibc test failures. Acceptable?

Richard wrote: > Hello experts, > > I am attempting my first LFS build; which will (hopefully) be 7.4, > built on a host system of slackware-14. > > All went well up until chapter 6. I am unsure as to whether or not > the errors in the glibc fall into the acceptable variety or not. > > glibc appear

Re: [lfs-support] glibc test failures. Acceptable?

On Mon, 28/10/13, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > > I have inferred from the book that 'cputimer1' and 'run-conformtest' > > might be 'acceptable' failures, but I was surprised that the test > > suite ended mid-way. > > It didn't. It finished running. Aha! I see. So I just misinterpreted the messages.

Re: [lfs-support] glibc test failures. Acceptable?

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 01:07:32PM +, Richard wrote: > Hello experts, > > I am attempting my first LFS build; which will (hopefully) be 7.4, built on a > host system of slackware-14. > > All went well up until chapter 6. I am unsure as to whether or not the errors > in the glibc fall into t

Re: [lfs-support] glibc test failures. Acceptable?

On Mon, 28/10/13, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > I have inferred from the book that 'cputimer1' and 'run-conformtest' might > > be 'acceptable' failures, but I was surprised that the test suite ended > > mid-way. > > > > Why do you think it ended mid-way ? Your output from the make > check command

Re: [lfs-support] glibc test failures. Acceptable?

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 04:25:02PM +, Richard wrote: > > I think I neglected to shut down the networking on the host system - so the > posix tests did not fail. I did not realise that network isolation was a > requirement. I do not have that machine with me here at work - so I will > check

Re: [lfs-support] glibc test failures. Acceptable?

Ken Moffat wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 04:25:02PM +, Richard wrote: >> >> I think I neglected to shut down the networking on the host system - so the >> posix tests did not fail. I did not realise that network isolation was a >> requirement. I do not have that machine with me here at wor

Re: [lfs-support] glibc test failures. Acceptable?

>>> I think I neglected to shut down the networking on the host system - so the >>> posix tests did not fail. I did not realise that network isolation was a >>> requirement. I do not have that machine with me here at work - so I will >>> check later. >>> >> >>   That is interesting.  And very pu

Re: [lfs-support] glibc-2.14.1 compilation error

Oz Gonaz wrote: > Hello all, I'm having trouble compiling glibc 2.14.1, I must mention: > > *Book:* 7.0 > *Host distro:* Ubuntu 10.10 i386 > *Host Requirements:* > sh version-check.sh > bash, version 4.1.5(1)-release > /bin/sh -> /bin/dash Fix this. As root: ln -sf bash /b

Re: [lfs-support] glibc-2.14.1 compilation error

Unfortunately the problem still occurs. Would recommend me a GNU/Linux host system in which is suitable for book 7.0? Heres my environment if that could could help: root:/sources/glibc-build# env TERM=xterm PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/tools/bin PWD=/sources/glibc-build PS1=\u:\w\$ SHLVL=1 H

Re: [lfs-support] glibc-2.14.1 compilation error

On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:55:06PM -0800, Oz Gonaz wrote: > Unfortunately the problem still occurs. Would recommend me a GNU/Linux host > system in which is suitable for book 7.0? > Heres my environment if that could could help: > root:/sources/glibc-build# env > TERM=xterm > PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sb

Re: [lfs-support] glibc-2.14.1 compilation error

>Unfortunately the problem still occurs. Would recommend >me a GNU/Linux host system in which is suitable for book 7.0? So FAR.. not done but I'm in Chapter 6 with only a problem in Perl just encountered and I think solved... Took me awhile to find a good host too. Here is what I went with: Wi

Re: [lfs-support] glibc-2.14.1 compilation error

Thank you Jason. On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 3:38 PM, wrote: > >Unfortunately the problem still occurs. Would recommend > >me a GNU/Linux host system in which is suitable for book 7.0? > > > So FAR.. not done but I'm in Chapter 6 with only a problem in Perl just > encountered and I think solved... >

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc and -march=i486 option

ante wrote: > Well, I try to ask it once more. Can anybody explain (or give me a link to > relevant discussion) why glibc should be compiled with -march=i486 option? > I remember that in LFS 5.0 it was recommended to clear CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS > during compilation; but why it is recommended -march=i

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc and -march=i486 option

On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > ante wrote: >> Well, I try to ask it once more. Can anybody explain (or give me a link to >> relevant discussion) why glibc should be compiled with -march=i486 option? >> I remember that in LFS 5.0 it was recommended to clear CFLAGS and CXXFLAG

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc and -march=i486 option

ante wrote: > On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> ante wrote: >>> Well, I try to ask it once more. Can anybody explain (or give me a link to >>> relevant discussion) why glibc should be compiled with -march=i486 option? >>> I remember that in LFS 5.0 it was recommended to clear

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc and -march=i486 option

On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > It was added 09/15/07.  See > > http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2018 > Thank you. -- ante -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above i

Re: [lfs-support] glibc pass 2 chapter-6

Garrett Gaston wrote: > > I have deviated from the book just a little. Instead of just typing > the commands I'M placing all the commands for each page in a script > called bld and running the script. In the script I'M appending each > line with && so what each line will not proceed unless the prev

Re: [lfs-support] glibc pass 2 chapter-6

script commands were finished? > Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 14:25:44 -0500 > From: bruce.du...@gmail.com > To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org > Subject: Re: [lfs-support] glibc pass 2 chapter-6 > > Garrett Gaston wrote: > > > > I have deviated from the book just a little

Re: [lfs-support] glibc pass 2 chapter-6

Garrett Gaston wrote: > > Sorry, I'M talking about glibc in chapter 6. As for the directory > names, I don't recall using spaces, I did use _ where spaces would > have been but I don't remember using any spaces. So is there a good > reason I I never got my FLAG file or got GOOD echoed to the screen

Re: [lfs-support] glibc pass 2 chapter-6

Sorry, what does top post and trim replies mean? > Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 21:40:03 -0500 > From: bruce.du...@gmail.com > To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org > Subject: Re: [lfs-support] glibc pass 2 chapter-6 > > Garrett Gaston wrote: > > > > Sorry, I'M talki

Re: [lfs-support] glibc pass 2 chapter-6

Garrett Gaston wrote: > > Sorry, what does top post and trim replies mean? Are you really that ignorant? Try googling for 'top post', I'm feeling lucky. Don't expect any more replies until you figure it out. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://

Re: [lfs-support] glibc pass 2 chapter-6

Le dimanche 19 août à 17:21, Garrett Gaston a écrit : > > Sorry, what does top post and trim replies mean? 'top post' means that you should not begin with your message but include it inside as I am doing. For triming, that's mean that you have to delete part of the message that are out of span a

Re: [lfs-support] glibc-2.16.0 configure error - relro

Thomas Jensen wrote: > Hello > > In chapter 5.7 I get an error running configure. The script stop with > following message: > > checking for -z relro option... no > configure: error: linker with -z relro support required > > See complete output from configure in the end of this mail. I have also >

Re: [lfs-support] glibc-2.16.0 configure error - relro

Den 21-09-2012 17:22, Bruce Dubbs skrev: > Thomas Jensen wrote: >> In chapter 5.7 I get an error running configure. The script stop with >> following message: >> >> checking for -z relro option... no >> configure: error: linker with -z relro support required >> > Hi again I tried one more

Re: [lfs-support] glibc-2.16.0 configure error - relro

On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 03:41:52PM +0200, Thomas Jensen wrote: > Den 21-09-2012 17:22, Bruce Dubbs skrev: > > Thomas Jensen wrote: > >> In chapter 5.7 I get an error running configure. The script stop with > >> following message: > >> > >> checking for -z relro option... no > >> configure: er

Re: [lfs-support] glibc-2.16.0 configure error - relro

Den 22-09-2012 17:09, Ken Moffat skrev: > Look through config.log in 'view' or 'less'. Find the error > message 'linker with -z relro support required', then look at the > lines before that (perhaps a couple of screens) to see what error > message was produced, probably by gcc or ld. > Thanks.

Re: [lfs-support] glibc --enable-kernel=2.6.25? why?

On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 04:30 -0800, JIA Pei wrote: > > > Hi, all: > > > > > Refer > to http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/glibc.html > > > glibc-2.16.0 configuration, the version of enabled kernel > > > --enable-kernel=2.6.25 \ > > >

Re: [lfs-support] glibc --enable-kernel=2.6.25? why?

On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 14:46 +, Michael E. Maher wrote: > Hi Pei, > > The '--enable-kernel' parameter specifies the minimum version of the > Linux kernel required to run the resulting glibc. And to elaborate - the minimum kernel version you need to support isn't the one you're installing, it's

[lfs-support] Glibc installation in target machine fails

Hi, I successfully chrooted my target machine and I passed all the way upto man-page installation, and I stepped into glibc(chapter 6.9). I performed all the steps till "make" without any error after entering the make check command Its giving me an error. COMMAND ENTERED*: make -k check 2>&1 | te

Re: [lfs-support] glibc --enable-kernel=2.6.25? why?

On Dec 16, 2012, at 8:46 AM, Michael E. Maher wrote: ‘--enable-kernel=version’ This option is currently only useful on GNU/Linux systems. The version parameter should have the form X.Y.Z and describes the smallest version of the Linux kernel the generated library is expected to support. T

[lfs-support] Glibc-2.17 errors at LFS 7.3

Linux From Scratch - Version 7.3 Chapter 6. Installing Basic System Software - 6.9. Glibc-2.17 at Ubuntu LTS 12.04 Based on this words on LFS 7.3 Book (Generally a few tests do not pass, but you can generally ignore any of the test failures listed below. Now test the build results:) can I ignore

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc-2.18 Test Suite Failed

On Oct 23, 2013, at 6:24 PM, Dan McGhee wrote: > make -k check 2>&1 | tee glibc-check-log > grep Error glibc-check-log What as the output when running make -k check? Sincerely, William Harrington -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/l

[lfs-support] glibc-2.16.0 build issue LFS-BOOK-7.2

Hi, I'm following the LFS-BOOK-7.2. While building glibc in section 6.9 I'm getting following errors: -- ./scripts/mkinstalldirs /temp-build/glibc-build/linkobj mkdir /temp-

[lfs-support] glibc 2.16.0 don't compile with gcc 4.7.1

Hi, I try to build glibc 2.16.0 with the Linux From Scratch 7.2 (Chapter 5.7) and it don't work : make[2]: Entering directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-2.16.0/math' gcc ../sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/wordsize-64/s_isnan.c -c -std=gnu99 -fgnu89-inline -fno-stack-protector -O2 -Wall -Winline -Wwrite-strin

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc make error “cant find -lgcc_eh”

Hi Prabhu, Looks like your compiler (linker actually) cannot find the 'gcc_eh' library: > cannot find -lgcc_eh collect2:error: ld returned 1 exit status This library isn't set up when doing the GCC build, so it needs to be linked up, with: ln -sv libgcc.a `$LFS_TGT-gcc -print-libgcc-file-name

  1   2   >