Sorry everyone for the misleading title...
Anyway.. i just booted into my spanking new LFS system... everything is
lightning fast...
ahhh.. (at the risk of sounding like an academy award speech) Thank you
lfs-support, thank you community, thank you OSS...
It's great to be able to build a s
Hello,
Thank you very much for your help with my error with grub.
With cfdisk I changed the partition id into 83 and now my system boot very
welll
Thaks a lot
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
On 4/3/06, Faheem Mohammed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's great to be able to build a system from scratch and i learnt more
> in these last few days as opposed to all these years i have been
> fiddling with *.nix...
> Beautiful.
Congratulations. Getting that first build up and running is a gre
Dan Nicholson wrote on 04.04.2006 00:43:
On 4/3/06, Faheem Mohammed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's great to be able to build a system from scratch and i learnt more
in these last few days as opposed to all these years i have been
fiddling with *.nix...
Beautiful.
Congratulations. Getting tha
On 4/4/06, Thomas Görblich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just built my first LFS and it went so smooth
> that I was almost disappointed that I had not a single question to ask
> here ;)
I'm glad to hear that. Incidentally, I'm often curious how many
people this is the case for. Most (all) of
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 4/4/06, Thomas Görblich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just built my first LFS and it went so smooth
that I was almost disappointed that I had not a single question to ask
here ;)
I'm glad to hear that. Incidentally, I'm often curious how many
people this is the case f
Warren Wilder wrote on 04.04.2006 17:29:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
Most (all) of the posts here are from
people having problems. It starts to make you feel that the book
needs improvement. I'd like to see some actual statistics of people
who made it through cleanly on the first try.
Isn't there
Rumor has it that =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Thomas_G=F6rblich?= may have mentioned
these words:
Warren Wilder wrote on 04.04.2006 17:29:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
Most (all) of the posts here are from
people having problems. It starts to make you feel that the book
needs improvement. I'd like to see some ac
>By the way, Dan, I wouldn't want to say that having a problem building
>LFS always makes the book need improvement. The important thing is that
>the book helps you to solve that problem, because that is how you learn
>more about your system. Some might profit most from the essential
>pre-readi
Dan
> Most (all) of the posts here are from
> people having problems. It starts to make you feel that the book
> needs improvement. I'd like to see some actual statistics of people
> who made it through cleanly on the first try. I biffed my first try
> with many of the same problems that come u
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 10:10, Dave Abergel wrote:
[...]
> My memory is that I did not make it through LFS cleanly first time,
> but that I didn't need to ask questions of the list because all my
> issues were covered by previous posts which I found in the archives.
> If there is one thing tha
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 14:24, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 4/4/06, Thomas Görblich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just built my first LFS and it went so smooth
> > that I was almost disappointed that I had not a single question to ask
> > here ;)
>
> I'm glad to hear that. Incidentally, I'm often
I think I restarted my LFS build four.. maybe five times. Almost all
of my build issues came from skimming the secrions too quickly and
either: executing a code block that I shouldn't have (tests I didn't
need or commands that didn't apply to my system), or not executing
something that was mentione
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Jonathan Webb wrote:
> My last full run through was a complete success using the LiveCD and
> Development LFS book (back in Jan or Feb) with deviations for the
> newest versions of most software packages.
>
Glad it worked for you, but can I throw in the obligatory 'FBBG'
comm
> Always nice to hear of people who build without problems, although it
> makes me jealous :-o
>
> Ken
> --
> das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
>
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
> Unsubscribe: Se
> I'd like to see some actual statistics of people who made it through
cleanly
> on the first try. I biffed my first try with many of the same problems
that come
> up weekly here, so I know that's not me.
My first was with LFS-4.1, a year ago last November. That was hand done
and I forget now w
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 18:40 -0700, Paul G Rogers wrote:
> My first was with LFS-4.1, a year ago last November.
Why on earth would you have built LFS-4.1 a year ago last November?
That was not the current version. In fact, it was very old. No
wonder you had issues building it.
--
Randy
rmlinux
>> My first was with LFS-4.1, a year ago last November.
>Why on earth would you have built LFS-4.1 a year ago last November?
>That was not the current version. In fact, it was very old. No
>wonder you had issues building it.
>--
>Randy
Don't judge so fast. I had three very good reasons, and my
On 4/8/06, Paul G Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd like to see some actual statistics of people who made it through
> cleanly
> > on the first try.
> That went very smoothly. My recent experience with LFS-6.1.1 was again
> from cut & paste scripts.
I did also 6.1.1 from nearly cut and pa
> And yes, a package manager may be nice.
LFS with a package manager would be Gentoo or Ubuntu :)
Eric
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 4/8/06, Eric Stout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And yes, a package manager may be nice.
>
> LFS with a package manager would be Gentoo or Ubuntu :)
>
Nope, when we talk about package manager, we d'on't talk about
something that would install or uninstall something automatically for
you.
We ju
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 06:50:56AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (a) I had the CD in hand.
Which CD? The first official CD for LFS was for version 6.0. There were
a few individuals that made and released LFS-based CDs before that but
nothing that was actually part of the LFS project. Not that
On 4/8/06, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 06:50:56AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > (a) I had the CD in hand.
>
> Which CD? The first official CD for LFS was for version 6.0. There were
> a few individuals that made and released LFS-based CDs before that b
>On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 06:50:56AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> (a) I had the CD in hand.
>Which CD? The first official CD for LFS was for version 6.0. There were
>a few individuals that made and released LFS-based CDs before that but
>nothing that was actually part of the LFS project. Not t
Hey, I wanted to thank you for signing up and helping me out. Don't forget,
you only need to complete one offer.
If you do not want to receive these notices, use this link:
http://www.mygiftresource.com/?PC=EMAIL
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-su
Hey, I wanted to thank you for signing up and helping me out. Don't forget,
you only need to complete one offer.
If you do not want to receive these notices, use this link:
http://www.mygiftresource.com/?PC=EMAIL
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-su
Hey, I wanted to thank you for signing up and helping me out. Don't forget,
you only need to complete one offer.
If you do not want to receive these notices, use this link:
http://www.mygiftresource.com/?PC=EMAIL
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-su
Hey, I wanted to thank you for signing up and helping me out. Don't forget,
you only need to complete one offer.
If you do not want to receive these notices, use this link:
http://www.mygiftresource.com/?PC=EMAIL
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-su
Can you please lock the list down? I get enough spam as it is.
Thanks.
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, I wanted to thank you for signing up and helping me out. Don't
forget, you only need to complete one offer.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinf
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 13:17 +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote:
> Can you please lock the list down? I get enough spam as it is.
>
> Thanks.
Can you please not reply to the list without trimming the spammed
message and stuffing up the spam filters.
--
Shane Shields
Registered LFS Compiler: 7582
To drink t
> Can you please lock the list down? I get enough spam as it is.
I second the request.
I have gone so far to get rid of spam on my system that I have implimented
a whitelist-only email system. Now it's seeping in through a mailing
list!
Eric
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lf
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Shane Shields wrote:
Can you please lock the list down? I get enough spam as it is.
Thanks.
Can you please not reply to the list without trimming the spammed
message and stuffing up the spam filters.
I did trim the spam like I trim all email I quote.
Stop wasting my
Did you?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 4/10/06, Nils Jeppe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can you please lock the list down? I get enough spam as it is.
This was raised a while back [1] and was replied to [2, 3, 4]. My
understanding is we will have to live with it.
Miken
1. http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/website/2005-Novemb
That seems to have been about email adresses on the archives. I am
complaining about actual spam on this list.
Anyway, I'll settle the issue via normal spam complaints to the ISPs
involved.
Best wishes,
- Nils
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Hari wrote:
This was raised a while back [1] and was r
35 matches
Mail list logo
