mhenriqu...@terra.cl wrote:
> Ohh right, I miss that instruction, but never mind, I never going to
> forget it after this :-)
There is a saying in English:
"Experience is the best teacher."
<>
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and
Hi guys:
I have a problem here at chapter 6 compiling gcc (6.16. GCC-4.4.3),
after doing everithing else OK, even the "make check" of previous
packages all OK, now trying to compile gcc I get:
checking how to run the C preprocessor... /lib/cpp
configure: error: in `/sources/gcc-build/i686-pc-li
On 25 May 2010 18:29, mhenriqu...@terra.cl wrote:
> Hi guys:
>
> I have a problem here at chapter 6 compiling gcc (6.16. GCC-4.4.3),
> after doing everithing else OK, even the "make check" of previous
> packages all OK, now trying to compile gcc I get:
>
> checking how to run the C preprocessor...
Hi Ken:
Thanks for your reply and yeap, it seems that it was a issue related to
a non deleted build or source folder, I rebuild the toolchain from
chapter 5 and then again the toolchain of chapter 6 taking care of
delete those folders and now gcc final compilation pass, now running the
test, h
mhenriqu...@terra.cl wrote:
> Hi Ken:
>
> Thanks for your reply and yeap, it seems that it was a issue related to
> a non deleted build or source folder, I rebuild the toolchain from
> chapter 5 and then again the toolchain of chapter 6 taking care of
> delete those folders and now gcc final co
On 5/25/10, mhenriqu...@terra.cl wrote:
>
> just to bother, the book mention something about that somewhere?, do I
> miss something...
>
Ch 5.3. General Compilation Instructions has an *Important* note to
delete the unpacked-source and build directories after installing
unless otherwise specified
Ohh right, I miss that instruction, but never mind, I never going to
forget it after this :-)
Cheer to all..
Mauricio
On 05/25/2010 05:07 PM, linux fan wrote:
> On 5/25/10, mhenriqu...@terra.cl wrote:
>
>> just to bother, the book mention something about that somewhere?, do I
>> miss someth
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 15:48 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > just to bother, the book mention something about that somewhere?, do I
> > miss something...
>
> 5.2 Important Note #1.
>
>-- Bruce
Out of curiosity, do you have any idea what proportion of questions on
this list are due to people no
On 5/26/10, Simon Geard wrote:
> I can't really see how things can be improved (short of blinking red
> text on *every* page), but it does seem like half the problems we deal
> with are from people not following it. Are people not even reading that
> entire "General Compilation Instructions" page
Ok sorry, it was not my intention to make a big deal about this, in any
case I fixed my self, so hope that this don't make to much troubles to
the list..
thanks again
Mauricio
On 05/26/2010 08:33 AM, linux fan wrote:
> On 5/26/10, Simon Geard wrote:
>
>
>> I can't really see how things can
On Wednesday 26 May 2010 08:33:20 linux fan wrote:
> On 5/26/10, Simon Geard wrote:
> > I can't really see how things can be improved (short of blinking red
> > text on *every* page), but it does seem like half the problems we deal
> > with are from people not following it. Are people not even rea
mhenriqu...@terra.cl wrote:
> Ok sorry, it was not my intention to make a big deal about this, in any
> case I fixed my self, so hope that this don't make to much troubles to
> the list..
Don't worry. Nobody's angry or anything.
IMO, if the same problem crops up repeatedly, with different reade
On 05/26/2010 12:06 PM, Mike McCarty wrote:
> mhenriqu...@terra.cl wrote:
>
>> Ok sorry, it was not my intention to make a big deal about this, in any
>> case I fixed my self, so hope that this don't make to much troubles to
>> the list..
>>
> Don't worry. Nobody's angry or anything.
>
>
Neal Murphy wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 May 2010 08:33:20 linux fan wrote:
>> On 5/26/10, Simon Geard wrote:
>>> I can't really see how things can be improved (short of blinking red
>>> text on *every* page), but it does seem like half the problems we deal
>>> with are from people not following it. A
On Wednesday 26 May 2010 13:19:54 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Neal Murphy wrote:
> > On Wednesday 26 May 2010 08:33:20 linux fan wrote:
> >> On 5/26/10, Simon Geard wrote:
> >>> I can't really see how things can be improved (short of blinking red
> >>> text on *every* page), but it does seem like half th
15 matches
Mail list logo
