On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Samuel Tyler <
samuel.ty...@education.nsw.gov.au> wrote:
> Okay - both have 0 active tickets - when is it going to be released now?
>
> Samuel
>
>
Wednesday.
Please don't top post :-) It makes reading things much harder for me.
Douglas R. Reno
--LFS/BLFS systemd m
William Harrington wrote:
> If we get a break in real world prioritized responsibilities, then
> the book may get some excellent updates. Until then, we
> are working at a frivolous pace.
Absolutely. I did not mean that as a criticism at all.
In fact, I intend looking at the CLFS roadmap and seei
Okay - both have 0 active tickets - when is it going to be released now?
Samuel
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Samuel Tyler <
samuel.ty...@education.nsw.gov.au> wrote:
> Thanks.
>
>
> On Friday, 2 September 2016, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> Samuel Tyler wrote:
>>
>>> In short: When is LFS 7.10 goi
On Mon, 05 Sep 2016 06:02:20 -0500
"Rob" wrote:
> Well it's using kernel 3.14. We're at kernel 4.7.2. I am not sure about the
> security risks of running such old stuff. The copyright date is 2014. That's
> what I meant by a few years behind.
Both LFS and CLFS are a guide. Since we aren't blee
This is LFS-7.10 RC1.
I am in the chroot environment on an arch live cd.
When running binutils tests in section 6.13, I get a bunch of failures.
Since the file is long, I put it on a pastebin.
http://pastebin.com/uWiE6dt0
What went wrong here?
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-sup
On 05/09/2016 13:02, Rob wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
Building LFS for the first time is hard. Many people have trouble.
And multilib is harder still (or perhaps just "more tedious", but
"harder" is probably a better starting assumption).
I wouldn't say harder but tedious definitely. There aren't
> From: "Rob"
> Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 06:02:20 -0500
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Force i386
>
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> > Building LFS for the first time is hard. Many people have trouble.
> > And multilib is harder still (or perhaps just "more tedious", but
> > "harder" is probably a better starti
Ken Moffat wrote:
> Building LFS for the first time is hard. Many people have trouble.
> And multilib is harder still (or perhaps just "more tedious", but
> "harder" is probably a better starting assumption).
I wouldn't say harder but tedious definitely. There aren't a lot of
instructions out th
