Many thanks for posting. I'll spread this to my Syrian friends just to
be aware of this.
All the best,
Hadi
On 01/29/2013 11:05 PM, KheOps wrote:
Dear Libtech,
We just saw that the website : http://www.syrian-martyrs.com is probably
compromised. Every page of the website contains an iFrame
Hi Nadim,
I think Fork the Law looks great and I agree with the concept wholeheartedly.
To the extent it overlaps with PlainSite
(http://www.plainsite.org/issues/index.html?id=4 for example) I wonder if
there's some way to combine efforts?
I've admittedly been neglecting the Issues page on
x z:
This is a great piece Martin! Thanks for the thorough analysis, explanation
and documentation.
I have two comments:
1. It is a bit sad that the petition People who help internet censorship,
builders of Great Firewall in China for example, should be denied entry to
the
I agree that the petition itself is controversial. The proposal is unlikely
to be realized. Gathering a lot of signatures will help bring attention to
the problem though. I would encourage people to sign it for that reason.
Martin Johnson
Founder
https://GreatFire.org - Monitoring Online
On 30/01/13 at 06:06pm, Martin Johnson wrote:
I agree that the petition itself is controversial. The proposal is unlikely
to be realized. Gathering a lot of signatures will help bring attention to
the problem though. I would encourage people to sign it for that reason.
Regarding that,
Most netizen knows about the GFW, just most do not care, provided the
governments give chinese users a chinese type sofware or webpage like renren a
chinese facebook that is used in china or QQ instead of MSN or baidu then
Google.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 30, 2013, at 6:17 PM, danimoth
I'd say the majority of Chinese Internet users are aware that there is some
level of censorship online. Only a small minority are aware of the full
extent of censorship though (blocking of websites, search restrictions on
Chinese websites, removal of content on Chinese websites, monitoring of
- Forwarded message from Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org -
From: Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:05:00 -0800
To: NANOG na...@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth
Organization: United Federation of Planets
In a message written on Tue, Jan 29,
He didn't know anything about censorship, nor about the great firewall.
I would second Martin. I'd estimate that
50% of China's 500M+ netizens don't know about the GFW
half the rest (25%) don't care
half the rest care, but aren't sure what they're missing.
The remaining
Hello,
I wrote a first summary on the case, I will try to keep it up to date
with new data,
https://words.ceops.eu/posts/Infected%20Syrian%20opposition%20website%20spreads%20malware%20to%20its%20visitors/
ALl the best,
KheOps
Le 30/01/2013 00:00, SiNA Rabbani a écrit :
Hi!
I sent the
You may be correct, and if this is so, and we do not account for chinese who
lives abroad for many years before coming back to China or those who live in
Hong Kong which is not subject to the GFW. Then a problem may occur, a problem
how they see the world on issue that would affect globally. I
My question: How come the certificate was invalid? Certainly the Chinese
government knows how to break into a CA and forge valid certificates?
NK
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:58 AM, pacificboy pacific...@gmail.com wrote:
You may be correct, and if this is so, and we do not account for chinese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear List,
Here is more details with credit to: Team Cymru:
http://www.team-cymru.org/
CC nodes for this version:
melaniibaby.no-ip.biz 173.0.10.52 ghostsx.8866.org
192.168.11.1 (so not likely to connect) awrasx10.no-ip.biz
95.170.198.155
@Nadim, I think breaking in a CA is a rather serious crime that GFW would
refrain from committing; but simply f**king with Chinese users are now
partially deemed as acceptable somewhat.
@Jacob, for the specific goal of the petition, i.e. denying entry, I have
the same opinion as yours, i.e., it's
On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 13:15 -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 09:55 -0800, x z wrote:
@Nadim, I think breaking in a CA is a rather serious crime that GFW would
refrain from committing;
Unlike, say, breaking into the Tibetan government-in-exile, Google and
hundreds of other
ALCON:
Again my email was lost, as I mentioned on my email that was lost, if we do
not care about the 22 percent of the world's population freedom and rights
and see that they may not know, then we should care about the Chinese
government stopping other people's freedom and rights, just because
On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 23:30 -0800, x z wrote:
2013/1/30 Matt Mackall m...@selenic.com
On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 13:15 -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 09:55 -0800, x z wrote:
@Nadim, I think breaking in a CA is a rather serious crime that GFW
would
refrain from
17 matches
Mail list logo
