Sorry libtech, some of the in-between mails were not forwarded
to you.
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 02:21:55PM +0200, Anders Rundgren wrote:
Asking for consensus on anything security-ish under these
circumstances is simply put impossible.
That's because you can't build consensus if some
I don't have much to offer regarding the algorithm issues but I believe
my 15Y+ with (mainly unsuccessful) security standardization efforts
have given me at least a perspective on this.
There are no entirely objective and honest persons around.
We all have something to defend like professional
From: Anjney Midha anj...@stanford.edu
Stanford Cryptofolks Summit 2014
May 28th, Stanford University
6:30 - 8:00 pm
Annenberg Auditorium
Register at
http://www.eventbrite.com/e/cryptofolks-summit-tickets-11612267605
The Cryptofolks Summit brings together Stanford faculty, students, and
On 2014-05-28 16:55, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
Again removing public-webcrypto-comments.
Yes, I forgot to mention that standardization efforts have nothing
to do with Democracy, Free speech, Level playing fields, or a
Quest for the best possible solution...
It is only about playing hard-ball,
Truecrypt.org now redirects to: http://truecrypt.sourceforge.net/ with a
warning to use Bitlocker and not Truecrypt.
Something seems off.
- Brad
--
Liberationtech is public archives are searchable on Google. Violations of
list guidelines will get you moderated:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 01:44:12PM -0700, Brad Beckett wrote:
Truecrypt.org now redirects to: http://truecrypt.sourceforge.net/ with a
warning to use Bitlocker and not Truecrypt.
Hard to tell whether it's a hijack or an actual warning message. Does it
make sense that TrueCrypt development could
That warning on TrueCrypt's website has been there since a while. AFAIK,
iSEC did a security audit of TrueCrypt and found various weaknesses and
issues in it. opencryptoaudit.org/reports/iSec_F… https://t.co/FEXS8JkSnZ
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:58 PM, KheOps khe...@ceops.eu wrote:
On Wed,
Hi Nighat,
When you say a while, how long do you mean?
There is a thread on the Twitters at the moment about this:
https://twitter.com/runasand/status/471740622031032320
- The the signature of the .exe still verifies.
- The key seems to be legit:
The new exe is apparently signed with the same cert as the old one, and
people say that the only changes so far in comparing diff's is the warning
message and turning it into remove-only.
(I haven't had a chance to verify myself, but these are claims from the
twittersphere)
-Andrew
On May 28,
If your bored
https://github.com/warewolf/truecrypt/compare/master...7.2
On Thursday, May 29, 2014, Andrew Lewis m...@andrewlew.is wrote:
The new exe is apparently signed with the same cert as the old one, and
people say that the only changes so far in comparing diff's is the warning
message
Hi everyone—
We’re organizing a campaign against mass surveillance for this Thursday, June
5th, the first anniversary of the Snowden leaks: http://resetthenet.org/
The idea is to build a bigger movement around sites securing their connection
to users, and around popularizing easy to use
It's probably just been hacked. Since the principals haven't commented
yet, I suspect they're probably busy diagnosing and fixing it. I suggest
ignoring the yapping on Twitter, having a nice microbrew, and awaiting
further developments.
And if those further developments amount to it's true,
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 09:31:42PM +0200, Anders Rundgren wrote:
Yes, I forgot to mention that standardization efforts have nothing
to do with Democracy, Free speech, Level playing fields, or a
Quest for the best possible solution...
It is only about playing hard-ball, hallway lobbying and
EFF and ARTICLE 19 Urges Governments to Preserve Fundamental Freedoms in
the Age of Mass Surveillance
San Francisco and London – As the global debate over the intelligence
programs revealed by Edward Snowden approaches its first anniversary,
the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and ARTICLE
Hi there,
I accessed the truecrpyt site less than 24 hours ago and it went to the true
crypt site i have been familiar with.
We are about to finalise a dig safety curriculum, so it'll be great to get some
feedback from the info-sec community about this as soon as possible.
Thanks in
PLEASE, NOT FOR WEB CRYPTO LIST
On 2014-05-29 02:33, carlo von lynX wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 09:31:42PM +0200, Anders Rundgren wrote:
Yes, I forgot to mention that standardization efforts have nothing
to do with Democracy, Free speech, Level playing fields, or a
Quest for the best
16 matches
Mail list logo
