-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
A friend and I have set up a discussion mailing list for activists
interested in discussing digital freedom, legislation effecting
digital rights, government and corporate surveillance, etc. Just
thought this group might be interested.
If you want
On 01/18/2015 09:44 AM, Crypto wrote:
On 1/18/2015 8:16 AM, Andrés Leopoldo Pacheco Sanfuentes wrote:
Is there such a thing? Reliable? Skype sucks, and it is a Microsoft
product now (too flickery, etc.), and I don't know of others..
Best Regards | Cordiales Saludos | Grato,
Andrés L.
into it.
Enjoy! And if you have any suggestions or questions, please feel free
to reach out to me privately.
Cheers,
Anthony
- --
Anthony Papillion
SIP: 17772471...@callcentric.com
XMPP: cypherp...@chat.cpunk.us
PGP Key: 0x53B04B15
Phone:(845) 842-2043
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
number.
Thanks!
Anthony
- --
Anthony Papillion
SIP: 17772471...@callcentric.com
XMPP: cypherp...@chat.cpunk.us
PGP Key: 0x53B04B15
Phone:(845) 842-2043
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTykuRAAoJEAKK33RTsEsVNT0P/ipdaajnKi4OyTzkWRRcXGP7
aPAP7vO22JxEo7SrBZiiDiiBv
On May 9, 2014, at 4:42, Ximin Luo infini...@pwned.gg wrote:
On 09/05/14 02:31, Anthony Papillion wrote:
On 05/08/2014 08:23 PM, Doug Schuler wrote:
Realistically we need to develop an entire suite of publicly owned
tools. Could the development and implementation be massively
distributed
protect your privacy.
Anthony
- --
Anthony Papillion
SIP: 17772471...@callcentric.com
XMPP: cypherp...@chat.cpunk.us
PGP Key: 0x53B04B15
Phone:(845) 842-2043
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net
inconvenient steps to protect their privacy and those
who aren't. The first group will be in the minority but will enjoy
privacy and anonymity while the second group will be pretty much at
the mercy of whoever can figure out how to access their data.
Anthony
- --
Anthony Papillion
SIP: 17772471
your favorite XMPP client (Jitsi recommended).
Server: chat.cpunk.us
Cheers,
Anthony
- --
Anthony Papillion
XMPP/Jabber: cypherp...@chat.cpunk.us
OTR Fingerprint: 1515393D53BA593C19E2CD549AE59FB650F82ABC
SIP: 17772471...@callcentric.com
PGP Key: 0xDC89FF2E
-BEGIN
On 10/18/2013 01:20 PM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote:
Il 10/16/13 12:07 AM, Yosem Companys ha scritto:
If you have any thoughts about Riseup, whether
security/privacy-related or otherwise, I'd love to hear them.
While i appreciate Riseup project goals and approach, i would not
personally
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
According to the European Parliament, Sweden has close ties with the
US NSA and Britain's GCHQ.
http://m.thelocal.se/50096/20130906/
Anthony
- --
Anthony Papillion
XMPP/Jabber: cypherp...@patts.us
SIP: 17772471...@callcentric.com
PGP
Hi Zooko,
S4 looks interesting but I have a question: how exactly does it
disprove PRISM style indiscriminate surveillance? I can understand
that with client side, pre-Internet, encryption, the data that PRISM
might suck up is *useless* but I don't see how S4 proves mass,
indiscriminate
and
simply said 'screw it, we're publishing everything short of usernames
and investigation details? If a majority of firms did this, how would
the government respond?
Best Regards,
Anthony Papillion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJR+W9CAAoJEAKK33RTsEsVO1AP/RGQordVyhr43BHt3CBMxz9F
On Jul 24, 2013, at 10:03 PM, Rebecca MacKinnon rebecca.mackin...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://blog.kaspersky.com/send-gmails-that-not-even-google-can-read/
Interested in people's opinions of this.
Thanks.
Rebecca
I think it's a good idea but how do you communicate the shared key.
That seems
On 07/10/2013 04:45 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
http://www.infoworld.com/print/66
In his own words: Confessions of a cyber warrior
By Roger A. Grimes
Created 2013-07-09 03:00AM
Much of the world is just learning that every major industrialized nation has
a state-sponsored cyber army
you a red or green light.
Isn't this the same concept as notaries? Something like www.convergence.io?
Anthony
--
Anthony Papillion
Phone: 1.918.533.9699
SIP: sip:cajuntec...@iptel.org
iNum:+883510008360912
XMPP:cypherp...@patts.us
www.cajuntechie.org
--
Too many emails
What is the most effective way to protect users against a compelled
fake certificate attack? Since any CA can issue any cert and any US
based CA could probably be compelled to issue a fake CA, how can we
protect against this?
My initial thought would be to publish the certificate
A few weeks ago, there was a discussion that ended in the
recomendation that Pidgin not be used for OTR messaging. Does anyone
know what 1) what exactly is the problem with Pidgin OTRand 2) is
there a fix in the works?
How dies Pudgin OTR compare to Jitsi OTR?
I ask these questions
log conversations
4. Allows access via Tor
Is there anything else I need to be aware of to make this more secure
for users?
Thanks,
Anthony
--
Anthony Papillion
Phone: 1.918.533.9699
SIP: sip:cajuntec...@iptel.org
iNum:+883510008360912
XMPP:cypherp...@patts.us
www.cajuntechie.org
On Jun 21, 2013, at 3:16 AM, Shava Nerad shav...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.sfbg.com/politics/2013/06/20/hackivist%E2%80%99s-call-culture-engagement
Pretty much what I've been carrying on about here. ;)
yrs,
--
Excellent work, Shava! Very passionate. I'm definitely sharing it!
A. --
Too
an 'official' policy around such requests?
Thanks,
Anthny
- --
Anthony Papillion
Phone: 1.918.533.9699
SIP: sip:cajuntec...@iptel.org
iNum:+883510008360912
XMPP:cypherpun...@jit.si
www.cajuntechie.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http
the community needs. Easy
to understand and doesn't require an enormous amount of tech or
security knowledge to grasp.
Good job!
Anthony
- --
Anthony Papillion
Phone: 1.918.533.9699
SIP: sip:cajuntec...@iptel.org
iNum:+883510008360912
XMPP:cypherpun...@jit.si
www.cajuntechie.org
.
Anthony
--
Anthony Papillion
Phone: 1.918.533.9699
SIP: sip:cajuntec...@iptel.org
iNum:+883510008360912
XMPP:cypherpun...@jit.si
www.cajuntechie.org
--
Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing
moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your
on this currently?
Your thoughts are most welcomed.
Regards,
Anthony
--
Anthony Papillion
Phone: 1.918.533.9699
SIP: sip:cajuntec...@iptel.org
iNum:+883510008360912
XMPP:cypherpun...@jit.si
www.cajuntechie.org
--
Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password
On 06/07/2013 12:18 PM, Nadim Kobeissi wrote:
I would never suggest Pidgin — Pidgin has never received an audit and is full
of vulnerabilities that the development team is reluctant to fix. Cryptocat
has actually received far more audits than Pidgin, although I'm not sure how
to compare
--
Anthony Papillion
Phone: 1.918.533.9699
SIP: sip:cajuntec...@iptel.org
iNum:+883510008360912
XMPP:cypherpun...@jit.si
www.cajuntechie.org
--
Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing
moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings
of other things.
HTH,
Anthony
--
Anthony Papillion
Phone: 1.918.533.9699
SIP: sip:cajuntec...@iptel.org
iNum:+883510008360912
XMPP:cypherpun...@jit.si
www.cajuntechie.org
--
Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing
moderator at compa
) Javascript way of doing OTR?
Thanks,
Anthony
- --
Anthony Papillion
Phone: 1.918.533.9699
SIP: sip:cajuntec...@iptel.org
iNum:+883510008360912
XMPP:cypherpun...@jit.si
www.cajuntechie.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Also, keep in mind that GPG can be used for file encryption too. You
could use gpg for both email and file encryption. FDE would need to be
handled by something else (like maybe TrueCrypt) but otherwise...
Anthony
On 04/16/2013 01:56 PM, Landon
I've heard this before. The story goes that, since Twitter can't tell
you that you're under investigation (NSL's come with a gag order), they
bring back some older DM's as a 'wink-knod' to let you know that they
received an NSL. I've heard a similar rumor about Google and their Gmail
service
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/30/2013 07:23 PM, hellekin wrote:
That said, though, even if I'm right on all those points, that's
not going to stop people from using it. And that's where
*you're* right: I wish you weren't, but you are, and I don't know
how to fix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/22/2013 05:23 AM, Joseph Lorenzo Hall wrote:
On 3/21/13 9:36 PM, Michael Carbone wrote:
Anyone looked into the reports that Skype leaks your IP address?
Apparently you do not have to interact with the person whose
location you are
On 03/22/2013 02:21 PM, Andreas Bader wrote:
Anthony Papillion:
On 03/22/2013 05:23 AM, Joseph Lorenzo Hall wrote:
On 3/21/13 9:36 PM, Michael Carbone wrote:
Anyone looked into the reports that Skype leaks your IP
address? Apparently you do not have to interact with the person
whose
On 03/22/2013 02:34 PM, Andreas Bader wrote:
Is this the same Script Kiddie Hack that was available for IQC a few
years ago? Don't you think that will solve itself?
Possibly. I've not read up on the details of it yet. But, regardless, it
does show that Skype leaks information that could be
On 03/22/2013 03:25 PM, Joseph Lorenzo Hall wrote:
On 3/22/13 3:21 PM, Andreas Bader wrote:
Is this the same Script Kiddie Hack that was available for IQC a few
years ago? Don't you think that will solve itself?
Not familiar with that hack...
This one essentially omits a few steps of
On 03/22/2013 04:03 PM, Andreas Bader wrote:
Here in Europe IPs mostly change every 24h. Some need more time.
If you are quick enough the IP change is no problem.
ISP's usually store the IP's they have assigned to customers for a
certain period of time. Even if your IP changes, there is an
On 03/21/2013 05:58 AM, Andreas Bader wrote:
Louis Suárez-Potts:
One is tempted to suggest using other than Skype. Alternatives exist, and
these are secure, at least according to their claims. As well, Skype's code
is not transparent, in the way that other, open source, applications' are.
36 matches
Mail list logo
