http://libertarian.org.il/?p=148
I do believe this will be interesting to all.
>Show me a link about such tests. As far as I recall, there have been no
tests of nuclear >explosives above ground since about the time I was in
kindergarten.
The test in question occured in 1957, on July 19th, specifically during
Operation Plumbob. Five Air Force officers and a photographer stood
I heard of EMP. Remember these nukes WERE touched off in testing.
And remember also I'd rather have EMP then have cities hit by the full range
of effects of nuclear weapons.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Wraith wrote:
>
>
> At 11:04 PM 2/21/2010, you wrote:
> >
> >
> > >sing a nuke to "defen
>sing a nuke to "defend against" a nuke is pretty much shitting where you
eat
Not really. Imagine a nuke blowing up high in the atmosphere and taking down
(vaporizing or disrupting the incomnig weapon. This is of course not
optimal, but it's far healthier for everybody on the ground than having th
How about nuclear air-to-air munitions? Nuclear anti-ballistic rockets, used
to take down incoming nukes in mid-air? Low-yield nuclear depth charges,
used to hunt submarines?
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 8:57 PM, wrote:
>
>
> Children, be good. There is no way a nuclear explosive (or even the
> conve
And nukes are also useful tactically.
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Valentine Michael Smith <
bkoehl...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Better dead than red.
>
> What if the states nuke DC?
>
> Wraith wrote:
> >
> >
> > Thanks. I remember reading about that several decades ago. Its yet
> > another examp
So, under your logic, would it be okay for a woman to use such a kit if she
IS a virgin?
>On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Zack Bass wrote:
Yes; and?
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Ann Morgan wrote:
>
>
> Boris wrote:
> >> We must investigate proceedings in an unprejudiced way and give the
> accused the benefit of the doubt, ALWAYS, or we don't HAVE civilization.
>
> By that definition, Islamic countries do not have a civilizatio
If you believe that every legal system that has ever existed is equal in its
oppressiveness, yes.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Wraith wrote:
>
>
> At 01:10 AM 10/14/2009, you wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > > >Given that I'm fairly tall for a woman (5'9"); in an Islamic
> > > >country, any woman my
>here is no use for these Kits except to defraud. The instructions are clear on
>that point.
What about the quite sizeable percentage of women who lose their
hymens in nonsexual manner? Or who were born without them? Or who are
under threat of murder and assault not by their lover but by his
rela
, Pasquinade Gardens,
> Penguin Parade, Ross Ice Shelf, Antarctica.
> TheSatireStall.Blogspot.com<http://thesatirestall.blogspot.com/>
>
> Contact the author in our forums <http://www.glossynews.com/forum/>
>
>
> --- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, Boris Karpa
> wro
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Zack Bass wrote: Owning
such a kit is no more fraud than owning a gun is murder.
The Egyptian ladies live in a society where they are forced - under threat
of violence - to remain virgins until marriage. They are quite often killed
or abused if they do not follow
Yeah, go ahead, insult all the minarchists on this list.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Wraith wrote:
>
>
> At 07:49 AM 8/13/2009, you wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >To you and to me and to most libertarians, sure; but to those
> >libertarians who are Pacifists it is not an option. Note how they
> >snu
In actual fact, a sex manual for couples has recently been published in the
United Arab Emirates [and recommended by the local priesthood] that
incorporated images of women in crotchless burkas [or rather, Burkas that
ONLY concealed their faces].
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Zack Bass wrote:
Well. I'm of the opinion people learning tactics and weapons is a good
thing. IT's the statist indoctrination that creeps me out.
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Frank Ney wrote:
>
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/14/us/14explorers.html?_r=2&hp
>
> This freaking freaks me out.
>
> Frank Ney N
"Dictatorship nations are outlaws. Any free nation had the right to
invade Nazi Germany and, today, has the right to invade Soviet Russia,
Cuba or any other slave pen. Whether a free nation chooses to do so or
not is a matter of its own self-interest, not of respect for the
non-existent 'rights' of
Claiming something is nonreligious doesn't make it morally right
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Zack Bass wrote:
>
> From Jan. 21, 2008.
> 2008, see?
>
> --- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, "Zack Bass"
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Do you remember what we are talking about?
>> Can you read the qu
17 matches
Mail list logo
