On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 05:50:31AM +0100, Luca Barbato lu_z...@gentoo.org
wrote:
If you are gentoo and you add patches like that, potentially breaking
compatibility with other distributions and upstream, then you are simply
doing it wrong.
Feel free to discuss about it here
Why would I?
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 01:12:21PM +0100, Luca Barbato lu_z...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Why would I? It's not my job to educate gentoo. They can break programs
and make life harder for its users as much as they want.
Had you spent enough time to follow the link
you wouldn't have made an ass out
On 07/03/13 05:41, Marc Lehmann wrote:
If you are gentoo and you add patches like that, potentially breaking
compatibility with other distributions and upstream, then you are simply
doing it wrong.
Feel free to discuss about it here
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=411847
Note that
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 01:44:21PM +0800, Dennis Lan (dlan)
dennis.y...@gmail.com wrote:
this patch is floating downstream which try to add pkg-config file
support,
It's not clear what the advantage of such a patch would be. (or generally,
pkg-config for a library like libev).
It would
Hi Marc：
It's quite obvious.
With this patch, Any package depend on libev can use pkg-config to
detect/check.
Retrieve the cflags, libs, or other information (make life easier).
Yes, it's a quite trivial patch, but useful. And It doesn't hurts?
It would be great if can include...
HI Marc
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Marc Lehmann schm...@schmorp.de wrote:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 01:44:21PM +0800, Dennis Lan (dlan)
dennis.y...@gmail.com wrote:
this patch is floating downstream which try to add pkg-config file
support,
It's not clear what the advantage of
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 01:26:54PM +0800, Dennis Lan (dlan)
dennis.y...@gmail.com wrote:
It's quite obvious.
With this patch, Any package depend on libev can use pkg-config to
detect/check.
Why would a package that depends on libev wants to detect it, when it
needs it anyway?
Retrieve
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 01:48:41PM +0800, Dennis Lan (dlan)
dennis.y...@gmail.com wrote:
Note that fedora plans to rmeove the pkg-config file because it doesn't
really improve anything (and they have an ethical upstream policy).
also where do you get this info?
From the new libev
(I accidentally sent the below message directly to Dennis rather than to
the list, so I'm sending it again for others to read. Sorry, Dennis, for
the repeated message.)
Hi,
I'll voice my opinion on this as a user of libev and as someone who
loves having his software work out of the box on all
Hi ALL:
this patch is floating downstream which try to add pkg-config file
support,
see bug here: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=411847
It would be great if you can include in, so we can carry less ;-)
Thanks
Dennis
libev-pc.patch
Description: Binary data
10 matches
Mail list logo
