On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 01:12:21PM +0100, Luca Barbato
wrote:
> > Why would I? It's not my job to educate gentoo. They can break programs
> > and make life harder for its users as much as they want.
>
> Had you spent enough time to follow the link
> you wouldn't have made an ass out of yourself.
On 09/03/13 11:48, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 05:50:31AM +0100, Luca Barbato
> wrote:
>>> If "you" are gentoo and you add patches like that, potentially breaking
>>> compatibility with other distributions and upstream, then you are simply
>>> doing it wrong.
>>
>> Feel free to
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 05:50:31AM +0100, Luca Barbato
wrote:
> > If "you" are gentoo and you add patches like that, potentially breaking
> > compatibility with other distributions and upstream, then you are simply
> > doing it wrong.
>
> Feel free to discuss about it here
Why would I? It's not
On 07/03/13 05:41, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> If "you" are gentoo and you add patches like that, potentially breaking
> compatibility with other distributions and upstream, then you are simply
> doing it wrong.
Feel free to discuss about it here
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=411847
> Note t
(I accidentally sent the below message directly to Dennis rather than to
the list, so I'm sending it again for others to read. Sorry, Dennis, for
the repeated message.)
Hi,
I'll voice my opinion on this as a user of libev and as someone who
loves having his software work out of the box on all Lin
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 01:48:41PM +0800, "Dennis Lan (dlan)"
wrote:
> > Note that fedora plans to rmeove the pkg-config file because it doesn't
> > really improve anything (and they have an ethical upstream policy).
> >
>
> also where do you get this info?
>From the new libev package maintaine
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 01:26:54PM +0800, "Dennis Lan (dlan)"
wrote:
>It's quite obvious.
>With this patch, Any package depend on libev can use pkg-config to
> detect/check.
Why would a package that depends on libev wants to detect it, when it
needs it anyway?
> Retrieve the cflags, lib
HI Marc
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 01:44:21PM +0800, "Dennis Lan (dlan)" <
> dennis.y...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > this patch is floating downstream which try to add pkg-config file
> > support,
>
> It's not clear what the advantage of such a pat
Hi Marc:
It's quite obvious.
With this patch, Any package depend on libev can use pkg-config to
detect/check.
Retrieve the cflags, libs, or other information (make life easier).
Yes, it's a quite trivial patch, but useful. And It doesn't hurts?
It would be great if can include...
Tha
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 01:44:21PM +0800, "Dennis Lan (dlan)"
wrote:
> this patch is floating downstream which try to add pkg-config file
> support,
It's not clear what the advantage of such a patch would be. (or generally,
pkg-config for a library like libev).
> It would be great if you ca
Hi ALL:
this patch is floating downstream which try to add pkg-config file
support,
see bug here: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=411847
It would be great if you can include in, so we can carry less ;-)
Thanks
Dennis
libev-pc.patch
Description: Binary data
__
11 matches
Mail list logo