On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 02:06:54PM +0200, Julien Nabet wrote:
> Hello,
Hi,
many thanks for your hard work!
> I've runned a cppcheck last git version on libs-core (master branch
> updated today) and found this oddity :
> [basic/source/app/mybasic.cxx:265] ->
> [basic/source/app/mybasic.cxx:260]:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 05:57:39PM +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote:
>> --->8-
>> Hi Sophie / Petr and all,
>>
>> Thanks for the comments and ideas! I updated several wiki pages today to
>> outline what we got through the discussion. Please would
On 04/26/2011 11:54 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>> You are well aware of the OOo-dev build process.
>
> Thanks for the mind-reading, but I think you need to try harder. For
> the record, I have never heard about that.
>
> --tml
>
>
I was replying to MM.
But come on Tor; I've great respect for yo
Nope same SIGSEV problem using 3.4beta2
How can I help track this down?
Peter
Process: soffice [2170]
Path:/Users/pteeson/Desktop/LibreOffice.app/Contents/MacOS/soffice
Identifier: org.libreoffice.script
Version: 3.4.0 (???)
Code Type: X86 (Native)
Parent Pro
Thank you for responding.
I'm running on an iMac G5 w/intel chip.
Mac OSX 10.6.7 operating system.
Dan Hopper
Xuacu wrote:
>
> El martes, 26-abril-2011 a les 17:24 -0700, Dan Hopper escribió:
>> I have a problem (inexperience) going to the 'command line' to install
>> L
As a retired Mac developer I would like to help track down this reproducible
bug.
Whom should I contact? Do I need to subscribe to the developers list?
The crash log gives all the details of my setup.
Both OpenOffice 3.3.0 and LibreOffice 3.3.2 exhibit this behaviour.
Steps to reproduce:
(0)
Windows only patch, please compile and check that theres no errors, thanks
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Windows only patch, please compile and check that theres no errors, thanks
0001-Remove-DECLARE_LIST-DdeTransactions-DdeTransaction.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org
Linking in the footer of the list is a good idea I think. Also, why not
give a description (and list of expectations) of the developer list at the
dev list signup page and at the mailing list description page? Seems like
knowing the "rules" _before_ engaging would be useful.
http://www.libreoffi
The attached patch fixes lots of cppcheck warnings in the components
repository.
By the way, did anybody review my latest pyuno patch update? Or am I not
patient enough :)
--Andreas Becker
--
All my code in this e-mail is under LGPLv3+/MPL.
From 965ff54b77b5ee87758d9bc1fe5c9c906192effd Mon Sep
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Zack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||36615
--- Comment #41 from Zack 2011-04-27 15:21
Hi all,
Thorsten Behrens wrote (27-04-11 10:42)
Thanks Christian, that's the ~sole bit of really useful info in this
whole thread. FWIW, the relevant bug is
Furthermore, with due respect, this thread shows me some other useful
information. Namely that there is a limit to what developers may
Windows only patch, please check that it compiles without error and i didnt
forget anything, thanks!!
0001-Remove-DECLARE_LIST-DdeItems-DdeItem.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.fr
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Zack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||36613
--- Comment #40 from Zack 2011-04-27 15:00
El martes, 26-abril-2011 a les 17:24 -0700, Dan Hopper escribió:
> I have a problem (inexperience) going to the 'command line' to install
> Libreoffice.
>
> Is there an easier way to complete the installation?
>
Hi, Dan!
It's hard for us to guess which kind of instalation are you trying to
per
Title: Pendrive para Brindes com a sua Logomarca
Caso não consiga visualizar a imagem abaixo
acesse
Para garantir que nossos comunicados cheguem em sua
caixa de entrada,adicione o e-mail market...@memory
Oops forgot to send patch
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Rafael Dominguez wrote:
> This is a windows only patch, please check that you can compile it and
> check that i didnt miss anything. Thanks
>
0001-Remove-DECLARE_LIST-DdeTopics-DdeTopic.patch
Description: Binary data
___
This is a windows only patch, please check that you can compile it and check
that i didnt miss anything. Thanks
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi Christian!
Sorry, it seems that I'm still a bit confused about that issue ...
Am Mittwoch, den 27.04.2011, 11:13 + schrieb Christian Dywan:
> Am 27.04.2011 13:01:36 schrieb Christoph Noack:
> > Just a small question ... do I get it right that the disabled menu items
> > get hidden instead
This is a windows only patch, please check it compiles fine and without
errors, thanks!
0001-Remove-DECLARE_LIST-DdeConnections-DdeConnection.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.free
Windows only patch, please review it and make sure it compiles without
issues on a windows pc, but it looks straightfoward thing so it should be
any issue with it. Thanks
0001-Remove-tools-list.hxx-include.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice
Looks good, thanks. Pushed
B.
--
\ Katarina Machalkova
\\\__o LibO developer
__\\\'/_ & hedgehog painter
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
LibreOffice mailing lis
Well this patch is for windows only, but i develop only in linux, so if
anyone can please review it and test it for me. Thanks
0001-Remove-usage-of-List-for-DdeConnection-in-SbiDdeCont.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOff
... really pushed, I mean :)
B.
--
\ Katarina Machalkova
\\\__o LibO developer
__\\\'/_ & hedgehog painter
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
LibreOffice mailing l
Pushed, thanks
B.
--
\ Katarina Machalkova
\\\__o LibO developer
__\\\'/_ & hedgehog painter
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffic
Hi all,
I'm adding the dev list in cc but only for information, please follow
the discussion on the tdf-discuss@list.
I would like to organize a new IRC QA session during the RC period. The
last one, hum, was a bit empty, but we won't resign ;)
So I think we (I) should dedicate a bit more org
Hi Yifan,
On 27/04/2011 13:42, Yifan Jiang wrote:
Hey Sophie,
Thanks for mentioning it :)
You're welcome, my fault to be so late.
I have ever sent a process document to wiki in the
mid of the month (13/Apr or so). The content attached as follows as well. It
would be great if you have a revi
0001-Remove-unused-sstring-files-in-bootstrp.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
They all related to the same files, try to apply them in the same order,
thanks ^^
0005-Remove-deprecated-List-container-from-Sectio.impress.patch
Description: Binary data
0006-Remove-deprecated-List-container-in-PropRead.impress.patch
Description: Binary data
0007-Change-Dictionary-for-std-m
0002-Remove-tools-table.hxx-include.libs-gui.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
0002-Remove-deprecated-List-container-in-FontColl.impress.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
0004-Remove-deprecated-container-List-in-SdPublis.impress.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
0002-Remove-DECLARE_TABLE-SwRTFCharStyleTbl-SwChar.writer.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
0001-Remove-DECLARE_TABLE-SwRTFStyleTbl-SwTxtFmtCo.writer.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
0003-Remove-deprecated-List-container-maTextRuleL.impress.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
0001-Remove-tools-list.hxx.libs-gui.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
0001-Remove-deprecated-container-List-in-ZoomList.impress.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
0009-Remove-unused-macros-for-GraphicDocShell.impress.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Am 27.04.2011 15:40:35 schrieb Allen Pulsifer:
> > No objections from my part to fully hide, removed /
> > not-allowed-by-sysadmin ones, but when it comes to hiding entries that
> > cannot be performed at the moment for whatever reason, then I say "no,
> > thanks".
> That is the way it currentl
> No objections from my part to fully hide, removed /
> not-allowed-by-sysadmin ones, but when it comes to hiding entries that
> cannot be performed at the moment for whatever reason, then I say "no,
> thanks".
That is the way it currently works under Windows. The former uses a
"permanent" switch
Hi Allen, *,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
>> > I'm introducing a setting that decides if disabled menu items should be
> hidden. Currently the code is broken
>> > in the sense that items are hidden if disabled on all platforms and
> UpdateApplicationSettings which theort
> > I'm introducing a setting that decides if disabled menu items should be
hidden. Currently the code is broken
> > in the sense that items are hidden if disabled on all platforms and
UpdateApplicationSettings which theortically
> > does that is a) counter-intuitive and b) not set by platforms.
>
> > On Windows it wants to package jre which is not there. So:
> > $ touch ../../solver/300/wntmsci12.pro/bin/jre-6u22-windows-i586.exe
> > $ dmake openofficedev
> OK, so there's a bug. It should only attempt to include the JRE when
> you build "openofficewithjre" target - so apparently the Produc
Hi
On 26/04/11 20:46, pjpuchyr wrote:
Running calc, I need to load a dll which is not in the search path, and my
problem is
that the Basic ChDir statement does nothing on Windows 7, so the dll can
never be found.
Is there a solution to this problem?
afaik ChDir doesn't work on *any* platform from
Hi Christian, *,
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Christian Dywan wrote:
> I'm introducing a setting that decides if disabled menu items should be
> hidden. Currently the code is broken in the sense that items are hidden if
> disabled on all platforms and UpdateApplicationSettings which theorti
HI Andras, *,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Andras Timar wrote:
> 2011/4/26 Christian Lohmaier :
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:05 PM, NoOp wrote:
>>
>> There probably aren't any patches necessary, just try whether the
>> openofficedev target works (I suspect it does, but cannot test now
>> my
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:37:54AM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 08:56:50AM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:20:31AM +0200, Robert Dargaud wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > In cursor.cxx I found 2 lines accidentally deleted by this patch it seems
> >
Am 27.04.2011 13:01:36 schrieb Christoph Noack:
> Just a small question ... do I get it right that the disabled menu items
> get hidden instead of being "grayed out"? Real interest: could you
> please explain what the rationale for the change is? As far as I know,
> there is currently no platfor
Hey Sophie,
Thanks for mentioning it :) I have ever sent a process document to wiki in the
mid of the month (13/Apr or so). The content attached as follows as well. It
would be great if you have a review if time.
Best wishes,
Yifan
--->8-
H
Gate CetralCaso não consiga visualizar este e-mail, clique aqui
Gate Central
Tecnologia de ponta para sua segurança
Cercas elétricas e Cercas Navalha
Proteja sua propriedade com cercas elétricas e Cercas Navalhas e mantenha longe
os delinquentes.
Equipamentos de Vídeo Vigilância
Monitore
NoOp wrote:
> The OP requested that beta versions be installed w/o affecting existing
> version. You are well aware of the OOo-dev build process. You are well
> aware of the issue, Yet you are asking posters to this thread to "dig
> out the documentation, test that it still works"? Amazing.
>
Hi N
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> There probably aren't any patches necessary, just try whether the
> openofficedev target works
>
Thanks Christian, that's the ~sole bit of really useful info in this
whole thread. FWIW, the relevant bug is
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36437
Cheers,
--
2011/4/26 Christian Lohmaier :
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:05 PM, NoOp wrote:
>> On 04/26/2011 07:07 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 20:13 -0700, NoOp wrote:
Just wanted to point out that both LO 3.4B1 & LO3.4B2 .deb installs
failed on my systems (miserably & yes, I'll
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 08:56:50AM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:20:31AM +0200, Robert Dargaud wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > In cursor.cxx I found 2 lines accidentally deleted by this patch it seems :
> > "vcl119: #i80730# fix cursor paint behavior and timer"
> >
> > I've t
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 36404, which changed state.
Bug 36404 Summary: More than one text cursor at the same time in textfields in
dialog boxes
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36404
What|Old Value
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:20:31AM +0200, Robert Dargaud wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> In cursor.cxx I found 2 lines accidentally deleted by this patch it seems :
> "vcl119: #i80730# fix cursor paint behavior and timer"
>
> I've tried to find an explication of this deleted ligne, but without
> Timer.Stop(
56 matches
Mail list logo