!
Florian Effenberger wrote
I think this is rather a question for the developers, since that machine
is maintained by them and I don't want to interfere with their way of
working. :-)
Yep. This is only a question for developers. Just ignore people who can't
code.
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View
an hour earlier :) ). I will check it later today or tomorrow.
Thank you again for adding the feature!
Best regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Master-builds-name-revisited-tp4021041p4022181.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
wrote
Well, I need to think a bit more about it if it is not used in other
situations.
Yes, that is a wise decision.
Thank you again!
Best,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Master-builds-name-revisited-tp4021041p4021829.html
Sent from the QA mailing
from the About
box and just add a nice Build Info button that would open buildinfo.txt
(with whatever program is associated with txt files in the user's machine)
This would make the About box less geeky and still provide easy access to
all the needed information for QA people :)
Cheers,
Pedro
it would be nice (for testing purposes) to have a tool to import
profiles from the stable version to the Dev version as you suggested in a
previous post :)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-minutes-of-ESC-call-tp4020292p4021148.html
about Private Betas. That could be tested as well.
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-minutes-of-ESC-call-tp4020292p4021184.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
4.0-betas with release
configuration. I guess that it can be installed in parallel with LO-3
even on Windows because it uses another prefix, ... How does that
sound?
What do you mean release configuration?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org
/Development/Tinderbox
that wouldn't be a problem...
Unfortunately most of them don't...
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Master-builds-name-revisited-tp4021041p4021056.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive
Stephan Bergmann-2 wrote
I wonder whether it would not
make most sense to drop LOdev's special handling of user profiles and
instead educate people on how to manually set up an installation's user
profile behavior to suit their specific needs:
IMO asking for user input is better than
ago. I'm not even worried about it any longer My original
question on this post was Maybe this should be added for future
situations?
The point here is that only when LO reaches RC1 will we know if all is well
:)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http
Rainer Bielefeld-2 wrote
see Bug 57444 - Wizards for Fax and Letter do not work
lt;https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57444gt;
Perfect. Thank you! ;)
Best regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANN-LibreOffice-4-0-0
and then answer Don't worry that probably works in the final
version ;)
Just my usual 2 cents ;)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-minutes-of-ESC-call-tp4020292p4020409.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
if your current options are correctly imported (or
simply to assess what is lost...)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-minutes-of-ESC-call-tp4020292p4020423.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
please let me know ;)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANN-LibreOffice-4-0-0-ALPHA1-test-builds-available-tp4020237p4020499.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
than in the user-unfriendly
Bugzilla...)
BTW The Letter and Fax Wizards don't work in Alpha 1 under Windows XP using
Java 1.7.0_09 (i'm not saying it's a Java version problem because I didn't
test with other Java versions :) )
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http
the outdated personal folder?
I believe this solves the problem with downgraders. Unless you also want to
add a downgrade migration tool for people who install 4.x first and then
decide to go back :)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa
if the installed build is a stable or an rc
build
Just my usual 2 cents :)
Best,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Online-update-testing-tp4001812p4016532.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
You can use a master build from
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/Win-x86@6/master/
or from
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/W2008R2@16-minimal_build/master/
(newer than Oct 12th)
--
View this message in context:
,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Moztrap-OpenID-support-go-for-testing-tp4012643p4012715.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail
Hi Kendy
Version 3.5.7.2 was announced two days ago but 3.5.7.1 still reports that
LibreOffice 3.5 is up to date.
Is this a normal delay or is it still updated manually?
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Online-update-testing
also suggesting solutions, so I
think that helps...).
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Moztrap-login-CSRF-issue-fix-testing-needed-tp4008926p4009118.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Works correctly with the Mozilla Persona login.
I thought the goal of this site was for reporting the results of a
Regression Test.
Instead the login allowed me to enter the backstage, i.e. the construction
and translation of the actual tests.
My mistake. Sorry :)
Regards,
Pedro
--
View
Hi Yifan
It's not working with the Mozilla Persona
Regards,
Pedro
Forbidden (403)
CSRF verification failed. Request aborted.
Help
Reason given for failure:
CSRF token missing or incorrect.
In general, this can occur when there is a genuine Cross Site Request
Forgery, or when
It is quite unstable.
I managed to login once but when I logout I end up at
http://vm12.documentfoundation.org/users/login/?next=/runtests/
If I try to log in again on that address I always the the error message from
the previous post.
HTH
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http
are saved somewhere (I ALWAYS use custom
install and my options are remembered on each update, as expected) EXCEPT
for the desktop icon which I ALWAYS have to uncheck
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANN-LibreOffice-3-6-2-RC1-test
://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35414
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/REVIEW-3-6-Fix-pivot-table-import-from-xlsx-fdo-53456-tp4001085p4001213.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com
more it can
do.
Apparently this (time based release) development model works for other OSS,
but I believe that is because they must have a much larger QA community...
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Fwd-tdf-announce-The-Document
in some setting?
Just more thoughts... I hope someone finds them interesting enough...
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Online-update-in-3-6-tp3992549p3999317.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
to provide. This is
just an idea/suggestion. If it is not welcome, just ignore it.
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Online-update-in-3-6-tp3992549p3998585.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Florian Reisinger-3 wrote
[Second schema]
3.6.0.00x for alphas
3.6.0.0x0 for betas
3.6.0.100 for RC (example) and/or release
3.6.0.200 for RC (example) and/or release
3.6.0.200 for release(example)
Simplest solution. Easy to understand which is the latest. The fixed number
of digits
Andras Timar-3 wrote
Yeah, it is a 3 x 10 pixel object on Windows 2000. At least it can be
closed with Alt+F4. Bad luck.
You can also dismiss it by pressing Esc, but that is not the point.
Does Bad luck mean Tough luck for Windows 2000 users because we are not
even going to try to fix
Hi guys
The official download page still says
This is a pre-release version not meant for genereal use.
(spelling error included)
http://www.libreoffice.org/download
http://ask.libreoffice.org/question/3072/why-this-is-a-pre-release-version
although version 3.5.4 was announced on the 30th of
://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46230#c6
It was impolite of OfficeUser to stress that but it doesn't seem like a case
to lose hope in a FOSS project
Just my 2 (non-dev) cents ;)
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Help-dealing
will have the same info, even if all
else changed.
Please go back to
LibreOffice 3.5.3.1
Build ID: 21cb047-d7e6025-9ba54fc-b4a51a8-f42372b
We already wasted a lot of time to reach this conclusion...
(I still think that some democracy would help this project)
Regards,
Pedro
--
View
Shouldn't this statement be on the Development list?
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Licence-info-tp3922126p3922495.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name:
Michael Meeks-2 wrote
No comments in a week ? I assume that the development builds have this
included by now :-)
I just tested LOdev 3.5.3rc0+ (Build ID:
90872c9-a73d29c-6845e52-f269e46-186d9ed or
Hi Petr, all
I'm glad to announce that the version number in the binary files now matches
the About dialog information under Windows!!!
This has been committed both to the 3.5 and 3.6 branch so it will be
available in the next RC (and Beta).
I have confirmed this with a daily build from the 3.5
Hi again Kendy, all
I just submitted this Feature Request (Enhancement)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48369
This would be a nice addition ;)
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-3-5-1-Online-Update-testing
on a removable media).
If the user opens the program (LO Writer, MS Word) and then uses the open
dialog to open the document, when the document is closed the thumb drive is
unlocked.
HTH,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Re-CFT-Windows-native-file-folder
both if you prefer)
Under Window XP the dialog switches correctly. Are you sure you are toggling
the Use LOdev dialogs in the Open/Save dialogs section and not in
Print dialogs section? (I'm asking this because it happened to me and the
options look exactly the same)
Regards,
Pedro
--
View
://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47840
http://ask.libreoffice.org/question/1459/secunia-psi-reports-insecure
Secunia gets the file version from the binary files
http://secunia.com/vulnerability_scanning/personal/how_it_works/
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http
the RC version at least use the numbering information which already
makes sense.
Regards,
Pedro
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo
...
Hopefully, it will be correct for 3.5.3 ;)
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANN-LibreOffice-3-5-2-RC2-test-builds-available-tp3865482p3877876.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
is that I got a dev build from the same day
(3.5.3.0 which I know it's not the same code but I believe that is not what
is making the difference) and the load time was repeatedly 4 seconds!!!
I will investigate some more as time allows ;)
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http
:) and saving 178Mb on dictionaries
only is probably a good idea...
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/ANN-LibreOffice-3-5-2-RC2-test-builds-available-tp3865776p3872362.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Hi Sophie, all
I'm not Pedro or Rimas, but I would have time to have a look for the end
of next week. If you think I'm not enough skilled, no problem.
Excellent! You are certainly more skilled, experienced and knowledgeable
about OOo/LO than I am. Thank you for jumping in!
Regards,
Pedro
can't have access to the installer at
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/win/x86/
it only shows the help packs. Was the installer removed?
Regards,
Pedro
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http
ages but surely increases memory usage? (I haven't tested this but
I can tell for sure that dev builds which only have three languages load
significantly faster)
Please consider this.
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/ANN-LibreOffice-3-5-2-RC2
there is an rc3 and this is fixed meanwhile LO is going to get a bad
image with Secunia (and all the security minded people :) )
Personally I couldn't care less about Secunia but since it only takes a
small number change, I think it would be worth the effort :)
Regards,
Pedro
there is an rc3 and this is fixed meanwhile LO is going to get a bad
image with Secunia (and all the security minded people :) )
Personally I couldn't care less about Secunia but since it only takes a
small number change, I think it would be worth the effort :)
Regards,
Pedro
Christian Lohmaier-2 wrote
Argh, so close :-) totally forgot about 3.4.6...
And the *second* release candidate of LibreOffice 3.5.2 ;)
I hope there is a third rc anyway :)
--
View this message in context:
ape wrote
*Attention! A blocking error Writer (LibreOffice 3.5.2.2; build_ID
281b639-6baa1d3-ef66a77-d866f25-f36d45f; Windows_OS):
File menu, point Save as: format FlatXML (*. fodt) is not in the list
of available formats.*
This is not really a Development question. It would have been
is indeed a wiser option from a privacy point of view...
http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/5323/what-are-the-downsides-of-browserid-compared-to-openid-oauth-facebook
Thoughts?
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Litmus
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote
Can you maybe be on the QA call tomorrrow?
I'm afraid not. 15:00 UTC on any weekday is during my work hours.
I will read the minutes later.
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Litmus-a-proposal
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote
Register mail just took a while.
Which brings us to the original problem: why doesn't it support OpenID from
the beginning?
In a little over a month, AskLibO already has nearly 600 users. How much
clearer does the message need to be?
--
View this message in
think
this is important
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote
Maybe we could even throw a limited amount of dedicated funds in that
direction?
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Litmus-a-proposal-tp3845560p3847644.html
Sent from the QA
of our most valuable resource: time!
It is because we do CARE about this project that we complain about the
short testing times AND the regressions ;)
Regards,
Pedro
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org
a one-off unsupported release created for the Intel AppUp store)
:)
Regards,
Pedro
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
of our most valuable resource: time!
It is because we do CARE about this project that we complain about the
short testing times AND the regressions ;)
Regards,
Pedro
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
a one-off unsupported release created for the Intel AppUp store)
:)
Regards,
Pedro
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Hi Kendy, all
Please, is here anybody who can check whether the 3.5.1 Online Update is
working? How to test:
- install 3.5.1 _RC1_ (for Windows, or other)
- trigger Online Update from the Help menu
- expe22Neo4j Community Discussions - [Neo4j] Database left in locked state
when an exception is
version is 11.0...) until at least all 3.3.x regressions
are fixed???
Regards,
Pedro
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
version is 11.0...) until at least all 3.3.x regressions
are fixed???
Regards,
Pedro
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
that we are NOT developers so asking us to read the
code won't help ;)
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-tag-for-bugs-related-to-experimental-turned-on-off-tp3822325p3822439.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
) because they NEED it and leave macros disabled.
Isn't this possible?
If testers KNOW what they are enabling maybe reporting is more accurate...
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-tag-for-bugs-related-to-experimental-turned-on-off
) deletes the text typed below and that pressing Undo (or
Ctrl+Z) consistently causes LO 3.5.1.2 to crash (under Win XP Pro x86 SP3).
However choosing Recover successfully recovers both documents in the same
state they were before the crash.
--
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http
ol klaus-jürgen weghorn wrote
Works now officially with RC2.
It does indeed. But the Update message is still confusing...
LibreOffice 3.5.1 RC2 is available.
The installed version is LibreOffice 3.5.1.
Why would someone who already has version 3.5.1 would want to update to an
RC release?
Nino wrote
No, it should do nothing - from the end user point of view.
For a 3.5.1 instal it should only report when a 3.5.2 (final!) update is
available.
(So the test is not passed in my eyes)
Or does the notifyer behave different in RCs? (If so, it's not an RC!)
From an end
Christian Lohmaier-2 wrote
it is the server that
makes the decision whether there is an update, not LibreOffice.
LibreOffice just displays the server's response.
So the server response needs to be fixed to properly identify my current RC1
as 3.5.1.1?
If LO sets two update channels the
Hi Kendy
Working perfectly under Win XP Pro x86 SP3, except that the Pre-release
page still shows RC1...
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/
Regards,
Pedro
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Jan Holesovsky ke...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi there,
Please, is here anybody who can check
) and I haven't
received an answer yet.
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Make-use-of-your-karma-feel-free-to-retag-edit-posts-Fwd-Q-A-forum-feedback-tp3790179p3793043.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Hi Christian, all
You seem to be managing the askbot site too personally.
Have it your way.
So if I want to have a copy of a suggestion or bug report about askbot, I
should email to the website mailing list???
(don't bother to answer, I'm done with this topic)
Regards,
Pedro
--
View
of it they looked like
similar things, but there were
utterly different under-the-hood so its confuses things.
So, point taken: when in doubt open a new bug report ;)
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-How-to-reopen-Bug-reports
Rimas Kudelis wrote
I don't know why you assume it's a Windows-only tool then. Don't you
have a web browser in your other OS? :)
-snip-
I've added this suggestion to the TODO list
(https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Litmus_TODO), but I can't promise I
will be looking into it anytime
Norbert Thiebaud wrote
x.y.x with z = 1 are bugfixes-release.. if they need a 'beta' then we
already failed on the principle of what a bugfix-release is.
You are correct. Sorry for the noise.
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org
e-letter wrote
Recent comments in the 'users' mailing list indicate that manual
testing is insufficient. What is the procedure to expand the quantity
and quality of manual tests?
To improve software quality, especially with reference to regression
of previous bugs, a selection of manual
Windows) I think this is a bad option.
Is this the plan forward? Only versions x.x.0 have Betas?
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANNOUNCE-libreoffice-3-5-1-1-tag-created-3-5-1-rc1-tp3773005p3774695.html
Sent from the QA mailing
Hi Bjoern, all
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote
In hope of seeing a lot of regressions marked with 'bibisected35' in the
whiteboard status. If there are questions, dont hesitate to ask!
This is for Linux users only, right?
--
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http
but according to Andras this is NOTABUG, so it
can be closed.
I don't have the time now to test with RC3 (and I couldn't test that
particular situation any longer). I'm sorry. Real Life TM doesn't allow me
any time :(
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http
Hi Nino, all
Having false-positives ist bad, of course.
But IMO false-negatives are worse :-/
Couldn't agree more :)
There were at least 3 guys that were particularly helpful on the second Bug
Hunting Session while I was online (probably there were many more). I
thanked them publicly on IRC
to you
guys!
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Minutes-QA-related-TSC-call-2012-01-26-tp3695662p3699797.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name
Michael Meeks-2 wrote
Well - we employ YiFan full time for this
snip
... so your work is much appreciated.
Thank you for that info! Now I know who to bug (pun intended) :)
What me work? :)
Best regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http
in a parallel install with pt-PT but I assumed that
it is how a parallel install works...)
--
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Blocker-in-3-5-0Beta3-tp3669807p3697401.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
this? Eliminate all bugs *. Eliminate barriers to reporting
bugs.
* I know this is an utopia. But you can still set it as a target.
Just my 2 (non-dev) cents
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Minutes-QA-related-TSC-call-2012-01-26
aware that this is a voluntary project and that everyone has the
freedom to do whatever they feel like... but as a project that doesn't seem
to work (especially with such an ambitious release schedule). IMO you can't
be free and ambitious...
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http
)
and it won't even finish. It stops with the following error message
Internal error 2203, path to target .msi-2147287035
--
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Help-with-parallel-install-tp3687803p3692924.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
to report.
The only solution I found is the reboot the PC, enter in Safe Mode, take
ownership of the folder and then it is fixed... But this is definitely not
user friendly ;)
Has this happened to any of you?
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Help
with the code the other day; if it is not
even working for the common cases ;-)
IMO remove it all. It doesn't make any sense to cater for some old unused
models (and introducing unneeded errors) while not supporting the huge
amount of newer keyboards.
Just my 2 (non-dev) cents :)
Regards,
Pedro
. Obviously manufacturers do
this to save on producing specific keys. So Locale doesn't solve the
problem.
Regards,
Pedro
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
in the
Language settings. The keyboard would be selected based on Locale but the
user would have the option to switch to the Language that matches the
keyboard buttons (or that matches the GUI, as Stefan mentioned)
Regards,
Pedro
___
LibreOffice mailing list
with the code the other day; if it is not
even working for the common cases ;-)
IMO remove it all. It doesn't make any sense to cater for some old unused
models (and introducing unneeded errors) while not supporting the huge
amount of newer keyboards.
Just my 2 (non-dev) cents :)
Regards,
Pedro
. Obviously manufacturers do
this to save on producing specific keys. So Locale doesn't solve the
problem.
Regards,
Pedro
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http
, but then again I was there only twice)
Of course this only makes sense because of the massive amount of Unconfirmed
bugs that were generated by the Bulk operation.
Nevertheless I would say it was extremely successful.
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http
not apply to Mac and Linux, right?
--
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/ANN-LibreOffice-3-5-0-RC1-available-tp3676361p3676633.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
that there is some bug with language
selection.
Does it work correctly in other languages?
If not, should I report this as a blocker?
--
Pedro
__
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org
that there is some bug with language
selection.
Does it work correctly in other languages?
If not, should I report this as a blocker?
--
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Blocker-in-3-5-0Beta3-tp3669807p3669807.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive
to Check at startup or Check manually
(which disables automatic checking)
Just my 2 (non-dev) cents ;)
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Check-for-updates-uses-keep-alive-impacts-the-server-opengrok-tinderbox-tp3661900p3665631.html
Sent from
Jonathan Aquilina wrote
IMO polling at intervals is also overkill (both for the user and for the
servers). LO should have an option to Check at startup or Check manually
(which disables automatic checking)
I think the best solution set it to poll once a week, and we must ensure
though
,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Check-for-updates-uses-keep-alive-impacts-the-server-opengrok-tinderbox-tp3661900p3665830.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
; and credit it to Kendy (Jan Holesovsky) who
did the work.
Of course. When I mentioned that, I already had planned to do it myself.
Obviously anybody is free to improve, move or totally replace the entry as
long as this new feature is not forgotten! :) It is under GUI.
Regards,
Pedro
--
View
901 - 1000 of 1081 matches
Mail list logo
