Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Make use of your karma - feel free to retag/edit posts (Fwd: Q&A forum feedback)

2012-03-02 Thread Christian Lohmaier
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Rimas Kudelis wrote: > 2012.03.02 14:09, Christian Lohmaier rašė: >> >> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Pedro  wrote: >>> >>> I never received a copy of my sent email (I assume you rejected my >>> previous >>> >>> suggestion of enabling the form to send a copy to

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Make use of your karma - feel free to retag/edit posts (Fwd: Q&A forum feedback)

2012-03-02 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Pedro, *, On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Pedro wrote: > Hi Christian, all > > You seem to be managing the askbot site too personally. Not sure what you mean with this. If it is implying that I'm the über-admin who decides on everything, then no - I'm not the one. > Have it your way. Yes, I

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Win7 - message: "LibreOffice 3.5 does not work anymore" - update

2012-03-02 Thread Michael Meeks
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 22:42 +0100, Luc Castermans wrote: > Related to my previous post: Ho hum. > - I installed 3.4.5, ran as Administrator > - now Libo starts, but reported JRE was missing > - I installed JRE > > Now I re-installed 3.5 rc1 and everthing is fine now. Hmm. > Ap

[Libreoffice-qa] Win7 - message: "LibreOffice 3.5 does not work anymore" - update

2012-03-02 Thread Luc Castermans
Hi, Related to my previous post: - I installed 3.4.5, ran as Administrator - now Libo starts, but reported JRE was missing - I installed JRE Now I re-installed 3.5 rc1 and everthing is fine now. Appears to me, the message "LibreOffice 3.5 does not work anymore" actually means that JRE is not i

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Make use of your karma - feel free to retag/edit posts (Fwd: Q&A forum feedback)

2012-03-02 Thread Rimas Kudelis
2012.03.02 14:09, Christian Lohmaier rašė: On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Pedro wrote: I never received a copy of my sent email (I assume you rejected my previous suggestion of enabling the form to send a copy to the author) Yes, I regard it as pointless. If you want a copy for your own reco

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] test cases quality; was: Ubuntu/Canonical doing more manual testing for LibreOffice?

2012-03-02 Thread Michael Meeks
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 19:21 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > Name: Translation check of creating a new database ... > * the database wizard open: all strings in the dialog box and > window are correctly localized to your own language. So - this looks pretty odd to me :-) This "st

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Thread on QA done by l10n teams

2012-03-02 Thread Nino Novak
On Friday 02 March 2012, 18:26:32 Sophie Gautier wrote in libo-l10n: > http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/msg04226.html Hi Sophie, all, I'm not subscribed to the l10n list, so I'm trying to answer here. Also, I don't know about others, I just can tell what I'm doing myself: > - A

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Ubuntu/Canonical doing more manual testing for LibreOffice?

2012-03-02 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Hello! If your not able use bazaar feel free to email the ubuntu-qa list. And yes the wiki page you linked is a great format to do them in. If you can take a look at this page, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Automation/Checkbox/Walkthrough it shows what format the tests eventually have to be i

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] test cases quality; was: Ubuntu/Canonical doing more manual testing for LibreOffice?

2012-03-02 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi Petr, On 02/03/2012 19:21, Petr Mladek wrote: Sophie Gautier píše v Pá 02. 03. 2012 v 18:02 +0100: Petr, First, I don't take anything personal in your mail. I disagree with you but it's nothing personal :) I hope that we could learn from each other :-) yes :) On 02/03/2012 17:26, Petr

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] test cases quality; was: Ubuntu/Canonical doing more manual testing for LibreOffice?

2012-03-02 Thread Petr Mladek
Sophie Gautier píše v Pá 02. 03. 2012 v 18:02 +0100: > Petr, > > First, I don't take anything personal in your mail. I disagree with you > but it's nothing personal :) I hope that we could learn from each other :-) > On 02/03/2012 17:26, Petr Mladek wrote: > > I appreciate that you want to teac

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Ubuntu/Canonical doing more manual testing for LibreOffice?

2012-03-02 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Sophie, On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 02:33:25PM +0100, Sophie Gautier wrote: > ok, but I won't install ubuntu, setup an environment on launchpad > and install bazaar (or do I have to? is it mandatory?). So a little > help so that I don't spend all my week-end on this would be: > - is this link the go

[Libreoffice-qa] Thread on QA done by l10n teams

2012-03-02 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi all, Just to get some information about l10n and QA and also because it's a way to reach more language community members, I've done a quick poll about the tests that are run on the builds, see the thread here : http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/msg04226.html I'll send a summa

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] test cases quality; was: Ubuntu/Canonical doing more manual testing for LibreOffice?

2012-03-02 Thread Sophie Gautier
Petr, First, I don't take anything personal in your mail. I disagree with you but it's nothing personal :) On 02/03/2012 17:26, Petr Mladek wrote: Sophie Gautier píše v Pá 02. 03. 2012 v 16:20 +0100: Another bunch of tests sounds like: + Translation check of creating a new database

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] test cases quality; was: Ubuntu/Canonical doing more manual testing for LibreOffice?

2012-03-02 Thread Petr Mladek
Sophie Gautier píše v Pá 02. 03. 2012 v 16:20 +0100: > > Another bunch of tests sounds like: > > > > + Translation check of creating a new database > > + Translation check when creating a table in a database > > + Translation check for Formula Editor > > Well, I don't think you get the

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Make use of your karma - feel free to retag/edit posts (Fwd: Q&A forum feedback)

2012-03-02 Thread Pedro
Hi Christian, all You seem to be managing the askbot site too personally. Have it your way. So if I want to have a copy of a suggestion or bug report about askbot, I should email to the website mailing list??? (don't bother to answer, I'm done with this topic) Regards, Pedro -- View this messag

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] test cases quality; was: Ubuntu/Canonical doing more manual testing for LibreOffice?

2012-03-02 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi Petr, On 02/03/2012 16:03, Petr Mladek wrote: Sophie Gautier píše v Pá 02. 03. 2012 v 14:33 +0100: - are the tests on Litmus good enough or should I write more? Great point. We have only very few test cases in Litmus (less than 50) and the quality is debatable :-/ For example, I see test

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] test cases quality; was: Ubuntu/Canonical doing more manual testing for LibreOffice?

2012-03-02 Thread Petr Mladek
Petr Mladek píše v Pá 02. 03. 2012 v 16:03 +0100: > IMHO, we need to discuss what test cases make sense and create a > reasonable test cases first. BTW: My (draft) thoughts about how a good test case looks like can be found at http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Test_Case#Good_Test Feel

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] test cases quality; was: Ubuntu/Canonical doing more manual testing for LibreOffice?

2012-03-02 Thread Petr Mladek
Sophie Gautier píše v Pá 02. 03. 2012 v 14:33 +0100: > - are the tests on Litmus good enough or should I write more? Great point. We have only very few test cases in Litmus (less than 50) and the quality is debatable :-/ For example, I see test cases: + create empty Writer document

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Ubuntu/Canonical doing more manual testing for LibreOffice?

2012-03-02 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi Bjoern, all, I've added Nicholas in copy of this mail On 02/03/2012 13:50, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: Hi Sophie, all, On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 11:29:32AM +0100, Sophie Gautier wrote: So, I'm ready to work on this, but as underlined by Yifan, it would be interesting for us to keep also our Lit

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Ubuntu/Canonical doing more manual testing for LibreOffice?

2012-03-02 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Sophie, all, On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 11:29:32AM +0100, Sophie Gautier wrote: > So, I'm ready to work on this, but as underlined by Yifan, it would > be interesting for us to keep also our Litmus system up to date and > synchronized because it's used under several OS and languages so it > has a

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla queries and NEEDINFO state

2012-03-02 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Petr Mladek schrieb: I have just fixed the queries at https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria#Blocker_Bug_Nomination to accept the "new" NEEDINFO status. Hi, thank you, it's really not easy to keep overview concerning used Bugzilla-queries in the wiki. By the way, we have lots

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Make use of your karma - feel free to retag/edit posts (Fwd: Q&A forum feedback)

2012-03-02 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Pedro, *, On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Pedro wrote: > Christian Lohmaier-3 wrote >> >> [...] and make use of your votes (so that other >> people get their karma, and to make it easier to distinguish >> "good/interesting" and "waste-of-time" questions :-) > > Unfortunately the karma points

[Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla queries and NEEDINFO state

2012-03-02 Thread Petr Mladek
Hi, I have just fixed the queries at https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria#Blocker_Bug_Nomination to accept the "new" NEEDINFO status. They show a bit more bugs now. Best Regards, Petr ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail ad

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Ubuntu/Canonical doing more manual testing for LibreOffice?

2012-03-02 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi all, On 28/02/2012 11:15, Yifan Jiang wrote: Hi Bjoern/fellows, Thanks for the lovely news! I am CCing Rimas for his concern as well. +1 :) Hi Nicholas, Hi Nicholas, I am Yifan from libreoffice QA :) I just took a view of the Checkbox wikipage quoted in your original mail and here are

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Make use of your karma - feel free to retag/edit posts (Fwd: Q&A forum feedback)

2012-03-02 Thread Pedro
Christian Lohmaier-3 wrote > > following feedback was sent regarding the askbot platform. > I can only agree - so feel free to make use of your karma to moderate > questions (retag, edit, ...) and make use of your votes (so that other > people get their karma, and to make it easier to distinguish

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] FDO bugzilla setting for following all bug reports of certain module ?

2012-03-02 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 08:13:46AM +0100, Alex Thurgood wrote: > I have been rummaging around FDO bugzilla trying to find a way to > make myself automatically get CC on bugs filed fot the database > module. As yet, I've not found any easier way to do this than by > querying for all bugs where the d

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] FDO bugzilla setting for following all bug reports of certain module ?

2012-03-02 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Rimas Kudelis schrieb: 2012.03.02 09:13, Alex Thurgood rašė: I have been rummaging around FDO bugzilla trying to find a way to make In your preferences, you can choose to follow the default assignee of Hi, that will not work, because we have a common default assignee for all Components.