Re: [Libreoffice-qa] qa test results

Hello, We used to leverage Litmus as our manual test tool, QA contributors would review the tests stored there and record their testing results for the latest build. The testing results are fully visible: https://tcm.documentfoundation.org/ Now we are considering to improve it to a more easy

[Libreoffice-qa] Mailing List

Hello, Recently John Kremer of Taos, NM gave me your website information and email. When I saw your ad I realized how our company can be a great asset to your company, so I thought I would write you and let you know about it. Our company features the home mailing addresses of all United States Bi

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Spam on this list

Terrence Enger schrieb: Might I suggest that body starting "Seu cliente de e-mail" is a good hint that the message is spam? Hi, I do no know how to create such a filter rule. The "ban" list seems to be rather useless, it seems that those addresses are not added to a filter rule? I am ten

[Libreoffice-qa] qa test results

Readers, It is not very clear whether the latest stable version of LO has passed qa tests. Please, where is the web page that shows the tests performed, the results and the software version tested? Thanks. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Spam on this list

On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 17:59 +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > Nino schrieb: > > > Who is in charge of the list? Could you ban this "Groupon Urbano" > > spammer? > > Hi, > > done! Thank you for the hint. > > Rainer Hmm, it looks like this spammer is still getting through:

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.5.4 RC2 test builds available

[Corrected mistake in Subject: [ANN] LibreOffice 3.5.4 RC2 test builds available] Hi *, for the upcoming new version 3.5.4, the RC2 builds now start to be available on pre-releases. This build is slated to be second release candidate build on the way towards 3.5.4, please refer to our release pla

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.5.4 RC1 test builds available

[Corrected mistake in Subject: [ANN] LibreOffice 3.5.4 RC2 test builds available] Hi *, for the upcoming new version 3.5.4, the RC2 builds now start to be available on pre-releases. This build is slated to be second release candidate build on the way towards 3.5.4, please refer to our release pla

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] req. wrt next blog on new functions in master

Hi Cor, On 2012-05-23 at 08:36 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote: > Probably I'll do a new version of this one > > http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2012/05/11/new-and-changed-functions-you-can-experience-and-test-them-now/ > tomorrow. > > Any suggestions (that I can afford time-wise, preferably ;-) )?

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] req. wrt next blog on new functions in master

Hi Cor, On 23.05.2012 08:36, Cor Nouws wrote: Hi all, Probably I'll do a new version of this one http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2012/05/11/new-and-changed-functions-you-can-experience-and-test-them-now/ tomorrow. Any suggestions (that I can afford time-wise, preferably ;-) )? Of course

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] req. wrt next blog on new functions in master

Cor Nouws píše v St 23. 05. 2012 v 08:36 +0200: > Hi all, > > Probably I'll do a new version of this one > > http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2012/05/11/new-and-changed-functions-you-can-experience-and-test-them-now/ > tomorrow. Looks good to me. Thanks a lot for continuing in this great eff

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [​A​N​N​]​ ​M​o​z​t​r​a​p​ ​e​v​a​l​u​a​t​i​o​n​ ​o​n​l​i​n​e​ - roles and permissions

Yifan Jiang píše v St 23. 05. 2012 v 10:53 +0800: > At the moment, the test suites are divided into different priorities (P1, P2, > P3, P4), accordingly we can create test runs based on the priority: > > - For Full Regression Test of a major version is to include all priority > of cases to

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] How to improve our Bug tracking system

On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 11:07 +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > I did some first thoughts concerning a Wizard gaining some basic info > from LibO (OS, Version / ID-No, some basic user settings (what still > need some discussion) with Rob Snelders at the Hackfest in Hamburg. > Gaining the info from

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] How to improve our Bug tracking system

Michael Meeks schrieb: It doesn't create a wizard however. The only thing blocking improvements there - the first of which IMHO would be to submit / auto-fill the component and version fields - is a lack of developer resource willing to concretely work on it ;-) Hi, I did some first

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] How to improve our Bug tracking system

On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 09:38 +0200, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > Is it possible to add a feature under help that says Report bug Notice that that feature is already there. > that then opens a wizard in LO that will gather all the required > details that would make for a good bug report, an