Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 4.2.0, the builds for beta2 are now
available on pre-releases.
besides the usual builds, there are also 64bit builds for Mac
available for testing.
It is the second of two betas (and thus a LibreOfficeDev build) and
can be installed alongside the stable version
Hi,
Robinson Tryon wrote on 2013-12-04 09:49:
Hmm...looks like you weren't in cc here -- here's my email :-)
yep. :-) Somehow the QA list is configured to do reply-to mangling, it
seems, plus overwriting the "reply to all".
It's hard to know how big a problem this is because the filesize l
Hi,
Could somebody add 4.1.4 rc1 to BZ? thanks in advance
Cheers
Sophie
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems?
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Florian Effenberger
wrote:
>> Sounds great to me. I would suggest we have some kind of fallback
>> plan, even if it's "File too big to upload? Please see if you can
>> shrink it in size or compress it before upload. If all else fails,
>> please email us at
>
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 03:40:13AM -0500, Robinson Tryon wrote:
> Sounds great to me. I would suggest we have some kind of fallback
> plan, even if it's "File too big to upload? Please see if you can
> shrink it in size or compress it before upload. If all else fails,
> please email us at
> ".
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:27 AM, bjoern wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 03:40:13AM -0500, Robinson Tryon wrote:
>> Sounds great to me. I would suggest we have some kind of fallback
>> plan, even if it's "File too big to upload? Please see if you can
>> shrink it in size or compress it before uploa
Hi,
Robinson Tryon wrote on 2013-12-05 10:24:
Tweaking the attachment dialog (and in particular the error message
when one tries to upload a file bigger than the set limit) should be
straightforward once we have our bugzilla code living in a git
repo...which probably will happen around the same
Hi,
On Sunday, 2013-12-01 13:31:47 -0500, Robinson Tryon wrote:
> > * blo
No for obvious already discussed reason.
> > * lbz
3rd rank.
> > * libo
No, too long.
> > * lo
1st rank. YES!
> > * lob
2nd rank.
> > * lobz
No, too long. Lobster, anyone?
From my view of a developer who has to type a
Hi all,
I'm fowarding a mail from FreedomSponsors asking about an add on our
bugzilla system that links to FreedomSponsors site which is a
crouwndfounding plateform. That means that some bugs could be
crowdfounded for their fix (and it seems it already happened for a
LibreOffice bug). I let you di
* Present
+ Adam, Kohei, Markus, Lionel, Thorsten, Eike, Miklos, Michael, David,
Caolan, Kendy,
Michael S, Christian, Norbert, Andras, Stephan, Bjoern, Robinson,
Eilidh, Ahmad
* Completed Action Items
+ mail Charles wrt. website / code-finding concerns: want a cgit link
nearby (T
Hello @ll,
after I reported the slowing down of my system, when I choose
different effects in Impress a couple of days ago (see
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/2013-December/005955.html),
I discovered, that with LO 4.2.0.0beta2 it
get even worse ... :(
Steps to reproduce:
Michael Meeks-5 wrote
> * Symbols for Windows releases (Markus)
> + Kendy's tinderbox is now providing the symbols (Kendy)
> +
> http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86@39/symbols/
> + We need it for release builds (Markus)
> [...]
> + provide it but not f
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Martin Srebotnjak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as the bughunt is nearing, I am re-reporting this, I hope it's just on my
> computer, otherwise it is a blocker:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71884
what mac os version are you running... ?
I downloaded the beta
Hi Thomas,
Am 05.12.2013 18:52, schrieb Thomas Hackert:
> Hello @ll,
> after I reported the slowing down of my system, when I choose
> different effects in Impress a couple of days ago (see
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/2013-December/005955.html),
> I discovered, that w
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the second beta of the
upcoming LibreOffice 4.2.0
Please be aware that 4.2.0 beta2 is a prerelease version and not
suitable for production use yet, you should continue to use
LibreOffice 4.1.3 for that.
However, as it installs alongs
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Martin Srebotnjak wrote:
> Hi, Norbert,
>
> as you can read from bug report, I am running it on 10.9, the system that
> majority or at least a big number of LO users on OS X will want to run it
> on.
>
and as I said below.. I _did_ download the beta2 build to a 10.9
Hi Thomas
Thomas Hackert wrote
> 7. Select the effect "Venetian Blinds 3D Vertical"
>
> Impress crashes ... :(
There is no "Venetian Blinds 3D Vertical" effect under Windows XP, only
"Venetian Blinds Vertical" but no crash occurs.
BTW why is the effect list sorted in an almost random order? W
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Eike Rathke wrote:
>
>> > * lo
> 1st rank. YES!
>...
>> > * lobz
> No, too long. Lobster, anyone?
>
> From my view of a developer who has to type and squeeze these into the
> alreay short enough commit summary line.
Hi all -- thank you for voting! For those of you
Hi Stuart!
(and hello to everyone else as well... :-)
I've been answering q's on Reddit relating to the BHS (I can call it
that, right? :-) and hoping to get a bit more involvement from
interested users:
http://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1s5yc8/libreoffice_42_international_bug_hunting_sessio
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to draw your attention to the bug report that I have opened:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72365
>
> I found this bug yesterday, and not sure what actually causing the issue.
>
> If I selec
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Robinson Tryon
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Eike Rathke wrote:
>>
>>> > * lo
>> 1st rank. YES!
>>...
>>> > * lobz
>> No, too long. Lobster, anyone?
>>
>> From my view of a developer who has to type and squeeze these into the
>> alreay short enough commi
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>>
>> The devs really like lo# (as it gives them more room in commit
>> messages),
>
> Yeah, and it is the dev that have to type it a lot, no ?
Sure -- and people on the Ask site, and QA people in FDO...err
, etc..
>>but by a wide marg
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Robinson Tryon
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>>>
>>> The devs really like lo# (as it gives them more room in commit
>>> messages),
>>
>> Yeah, and it is the dev that have to type it a lot, no ?
>
> Sure -- and people on the Ask
Hi all,
This is the time to prepare our annual report about the so various
activities we have achieved during this year. Florian will then
translate and adapt it to serve as the official report for the Berlin
authorities.
I've prepared a pad here:
http://pad.documentfoundation.org/p/annualreport
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:05 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> sure but the dev need to use the canonical abbreviation because we
> have bot that use them to detect association between commit and bugs
> that is not the case on Ask for instance
technically speaking, the bot could recognize lo# as well
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Jean Weber wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Norbert Thiebaud
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Martin Srebotnjak wrote:
>>> Hi, Norbert,
>>>
>>> as you can read from bug report, I am running it on 10.9, the system that
>>> majority or at least
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Robinson Tryon
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:05 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>> sure but the dev need to use the canonical abbreviation because we
>> have bot that use them to detect association between commit and bugs
>> that is not the case on Ask for instance
27 matches
Mail list logo
