On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 16:39 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> + would be nice to have some blog-posts / picture posts (Bjoern)
I just finished mine.
http://kohei.us/2014/11/03/seattle-librefest/
Kohei
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail ad
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 11:38 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 16:39 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > * Seattle Hackfest (Robinson/Norbert)
> ...
> > + badly need ways to stop 'building' consuming the hack-fest (Michael)
> > + or a way to keep hand-holding after the hack
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 20:00 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
>+ I think that the best would be to have this option locale to the
> sorting dialog instead of global for Calc
> Is it something possible?
Not unless someone volunteers. FYI it would require a fair amount of
code change
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 20:13 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> Le 30/10/2014 20:05, Kohei Yoshida a écrit :
> > On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 20:00 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> >>+ I think that the best would be to have this option locale to the
> >> sorting d
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 16:07 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:06:07AM -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > So, to me personally, this practice of "witch-hunting" (or
> > finger-pointing) really bogs me down, especially I receive su
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 15:41 +0200, Joren DC wrote:
> Hi Kohei,
>
> Kohei Yoshida schreef op 5/06/2014 15:06:
> > So, to me personally, this practice of "witch-hunting" (or
> > finger-pointing) really bogs me down, especially I receive such notice
> > hundreds
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 14:42 +0200, Joren DC wrote:
> Hi Xisco, *,
>
> Xisco Faulí schreef op 5/06/2014 10:32:
> > does it make sense to include another status for the regression issues
> > where the problematic commit has been identified ? I'm asking it
> > because yesterday I spent some time on
This bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77479
fell through the crack and became "confirmed" but it really isn't. It
went from
UNCONFIRMED -> WORKSFORME -> REOPENED
and REOPENED is handled as if it's been confirmed, hence the problem.
Could anyone give this a quick look?
Thanks,
On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 12:30 -0400, Jay Lozier wrote:
> Kohei,
>
> I can not confirm the bug on 4.2.3.3/Manjaro Linux. Arrow key movement
> is working correctly on my box. Left, right, up, and down arrows move
> the active cell in proper directions; one cell per key stroke. I would
> re-rate this
Hi there,
With regard to this bug report
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77409
could someone please verify this, or set the STATUS to UNCONFIRMED?
It appears that this bug has not been properly triaged and the reporter
set the status to NEW directly. And either I cannot reproduce
Hi Terrence,
On Fri, 2014-04-18 at 11:36 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
> However, I have not touched the
> resolutions--76008 and 76148 both being DUP's of 76470--as I am
> impressed by the reported problems disappearing in an interval which
> includes commit c78d1bb "fdo#76470: Avoid joining new f
Hi there,
Just FYI, the error message "vector::_M_range_check", if you ever see
this, is generated from an STL library itself, and is a very common
error message associated with a out-of-range access to array.
What this means is that, just because you see this same error message in
2 bug reports
On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 08:19 -0700, m.a.riosv wrote:
> Hi,
> perhaps only two digits could be a bit short, IMO three can be a more
> balanced option, because it has a good correspondence with public releases.
Yeah, I think I'd be happy with this.
Also, part of the problems comes from the total-uns
On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 14:56 +, V Stuart Foote wrote:
> @Kohei,
>
> Not so sure, because it goes the other way as well.
>
> When attempting to triage a bug, having the correct release --or
> better the commit information to exactly reproduce the issue as
> reported, and work backward to poin
On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 09:58 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> IMO we should only have 4.0, 4.1, 4.2 etc as version. All these too
> fine grained version numbers only serve to make bugs discoverable.
I mean "make bugs *un*-discoverable".
_
Hi there,
Another thing I'd like to inquire about is that currently we have way
too fine-grained version field options it's becoming increasingly
difficult to query for "give me all bugs for 4.2" and similar. For
instance, even for the 4.2 branch we have
4.2.0.0alpha0+Master,
4.2.0.0alpha1
4.2.0
Hi there,
I'm just wondering whether it's possible to disallow reopening of bugs
if they are at least more than a year old (or whatever some arbitrary
time period)? I've seen people re-opening bugs that were closed more
than 2-3 years ago. This happens quite often.
Kohei
__
Hello Terrence,
On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 15:42 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have noticed several bugs where my debug build shows the debug STL
> library raising an assertion. Would it be useful to have a tracker
> bug for these? A word on the whiteboard?
Just filing it as a nor
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 11:33 +0100, M Henri Day wrote:
> Kohei, any chance of a patch for Linux (in my specific case, deb)
> users being posted in the near future, in addition to those you've
> already posted for Windows and Mac users, respectively ?...
Actually, I don't know personally. Let m
Hi Joel,
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 22:22 -0800, Joel Madero wrote:
> Thanks Kohei for your work - I'm sure you're swamped. That being said,
> is there something QA can do to help organize for you? Or is a bug being
> marked a regression against 4.2 sufficient?
Yeah. What you guys have been doing is
Hi there,
The amount of Calc regresssions we are dealing with in 4.2.0 is
overwhelming, and I don't think anyone would deny that. I'm also hard at
work to try to fix them as much as my time allows.
Having said that, I'm generally very pleased with the quality of the bug
reports we are getting. T
Hi there,
FYI, a large number of Calc freeze problems may be attributed to the
same root cause, which I fixed for Bug 72470
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72470
The problem code kicks in when you have a document that has at least one
cell containing mixed script types. Pretty much
On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 23:09 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> I'd like to keep this a separate bug, though, rather than re-opening
> fdo#66969...
I've filed a new one. Let's track this one there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 22:56 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> Let us keep the list informed of our discussion.
>
> Good night.
>
> Kohei
>
> On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 04:30 +0100, Sebastian Goetze wrote:
> > Hi Kohei,
> >
> > I downloaded
set a project filter and then try get rid of some checkmarks in the
> 'Project Name' filter...
>
> G'Night
>
> Sebastian
>
> On 12/17/2013 2:24 AM, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > If some of you have some little spare time, could yo
On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 17:56 -0800, mariosv wrote:
> Hi Kohei,
>
> I have reported in the bug with a screenshot about what I see after
> refresh, if I am not wrong it is fine with:
> Win7x64Ultimate
> Version: 4.2.0.0.beta2+Build ID:
> d663228bd348c844f38914c9e2167ef01fadf3b3
> TinderBox: Win
Hi there,
If some of you have some little spare time, could you verify my fix for
the following bug?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66969
Sebastian tried to verify it but he says the bug is still there. My
initial suspicion was that the build he used didn't contain my fix, but
acc
Sorry. Posted to the wrong mailing list. This should have been sent to
the developer list, not the QA list.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mai
e nobody has
really ventured into up until now, and discover some obscure use of
"published" API which hinders further rework unless the API is
unpublished. Since we still have lots of areas in our code base where
nobody has stepped up to claim maintainer-ship, this is a very likely
p
On 01/28/2013 10:52 AM, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
I have hard time reproducing this bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59850
Can someone do a bit more triaging to narrow it down a bit?
And many thanks for those who've chipped in!
All the best,
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreO
I have hard time reproducing this bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59850
Can someone do a bit more triaging to narrow it down a bit?
Thanks,
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Rainer Bielefeld <
libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de> wrote:
>
> Actually, I could go a step further and change the assignee of these
>> bugs with status NEW to the default assignee to further remove
>> ambiguity,
>>
>
>
> It was the the core of my question whether
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Rainer Bielefeld <
libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de> wrote:
> Hi Kohei,
>
> I see that you changed status of several bugs [1] with you as assignee
> from status ASSIGNED to NEW.
>
> My interpretation is that you are intending to do some work on it, but
> currently t
with a stack trace...
Anyway, thanks in advance.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman
-6
branch with my sign-off. I was originally a fix from Muthu.
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/gitweb?p=core.git;a=commitdiff;h=3ad52a6453ff612409123db29dc74a9071789aab
I'll create another thread requesting a backport to 3-6-2.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffi
On 06/04/2012 04:51 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 4:16 PM, MiguelAngel wrote:
Can someone also verify, before report bug?
Menu/Insert/Insert sheet from file
doesn't work for CSV files, do nothing, but works for ods or hmtl.
Yes, I can confirm this. This is probab
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 4:16 PM, MiguelAngel wrote:
> Can someone also verify, before report bug?
>
> Menu/Insert/Insert sheet from file
>
> doesn't work for CSV files, do nothing, but works for ods or hmtl.
Yes, I can confirm this. This is probably my bug, since I've changed
the type detection c
Hello,
I think we could use some help dealing with an ugly personal attack
disguised as a bug report.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49115
It's a bug reporter like this that makes me lose hope in a FOSS
project such as this one.
Best,
Kohei
___
it happened - I am
> sure
> the bug will get much more attention than without that :-)
And if people need more specific task, having someone run bibisect on
the following bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40320
would be great, and that would serve as a good exercise on how t
tes
> of their time...
Gotcha. Yes, I agree; it's a shame indeed. Although in my observation
those same users aren't too shy about reporting problems in forums and
other communication mediums. Perhaps there is something about bugzilla
and its envir
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 10:51 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> I'm the one you
> made the change
Correction: I'm the one *that* made the change
I hate typing.
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa m
25
> *million* people worldwide has half a dozen people in QA... I guess this
> shows a lot about human nature :(
Could you clarify on this? I'm not sure how to interpret this.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
__
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I was copying cells between two open spreadsheets, one in 3.4.4 final
> and another on LibO-dev 3.5.0 ( a286353-090bcba-3bf3b94) aka
> master~2011-12-02_22.36.35_libodev35 from Win-x86@6
>
> When I pasted a cell containing a formula,
43 matches
Mail list logo
