Thank you Xisco, for this nice human-readable report!
A real advancement for LibO-QA, I believe :)
Nino
On 24.10.2016 09:34, Xisco Fauli wrote:
What have happened in QA in the last week? [...]
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail
reoffice.org/pre-releases/src/bugs-libreoffice-5-0-0-release-5.0.0.3.log>
:)
Regards,
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo
n't report them, but rather
thought to discuss them here.
Nino
[1] https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86636
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change
ust remove all the objects from the
document one by one and at each step look if the problematic behavior is
still reproducible. As a first test, you can copy all contents from the
problematic document into a new document to exclude that there is some
(old/inherited) flaw in the
he projects you are looking for:
+ There are also several other projects hosted here:
Regards, Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailm
On 11.02.2015 at 23:01, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> A list of known issues and fixed bugs with 4.3.6 RC2 is available
> from our wiki:
>
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/4.3.6/RC2
the page is empty.
Regards,
Nino
_
e two version informations as separate fields in the bug
table? (didn't find it in the wiki)
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/l
probably a completely new underline
functionality must be implemented, which looks like a rather complex task to
me - but I'm not a dev, maybe there exist simpler solutions/workarounds.
my2¢
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address
The search on your website does not work.
Regards,
Nino
Am 16.10.2014 um 07:44 schrieb Ubaid:
> Hello,
>
> I am Ubaid from www.listoffreeware.com <http://www.listoffreeware.com/>.
> This is a popular tech blog that lists best free software out there.
>
> I am sending t
I received a translation by PM and added it to the bugs.
Though, the reports don't look very clear to me, therefore the whole action
was of little value I fear. But perhaps now somebody of the QA experts is
able to sort out what the reporters wanted to say.
Nino
Am 10.09.2014 um 18:26 sc
Could please someone understanding Portuguese have a look at these bugs and
translate them:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83681
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83673
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83629
Thanks,
Nino
(proof of concept, QA + l10n lists
sh.
A NEEDSTRANSLATION keyword could also help if we could somehow report those
bugs to an appropriate list (l10n would be my choice if people there agree
but qa might even be better as most qa-interested NL-folks at least lurk here).
just my2¢
Nino
___
Lis
been thought of until
now. But now it has come up and therefore needs to be acknoledged.
As it clearly is "unwanted behavior", the classification "NOTABUG" is
clearly the wrongest possible decision.
Sorry, my 2 cents.
Nino
_
d). It makes life so much easier
> for others...
ups... you're so right...
I'll do my very best :-)
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedes
Am 25.06.2014 10:56, schrieb Nino Novak:
> Am 25.06.2014 08:47, schrieb Jay Philips:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I was going through bug 80220 and not able to reproduce it with the
>> instructions provided bug the reporter mentions it effect writing
>> english documen
d look at it, that would be great, as its the only
> unconfirmed bug left in writer since the 1st of may.
I'm going to give it a try.
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop
% of the
reported bugs have been fixed" or similar, it would sound more reliable, IMHO.
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/l
ty / Contribute
(with Links to mailing lists/IRC/whatever...)
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http:/
;FDO".
>> Suggestions:
>> lo ("LO") - e.g. "lo#12345" (The lower-case "L" is ambiguous...)
>> libo
>> bz - e.g. "bz#12345"
>> bgz
>
>
> I vote for "libo"
> "lo" makes me think about J.Lo :-)
&g
# of
bugs reported.
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists
ports.
Joel,
can we see the effect graphically?
Cheers,
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.l
hould try.
If we get overwhelmed with NOTOURBUGs or FIXED in all other versions, we
should reconsider.
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/
Am 30.05.2013 09:31, schrieb Fridrich Strba:
> ... we set a tinderbox ...
Hi,
where can I find these builds?
Thanks,
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: h
gs by (non-subscribed)
devs in a heaty discussion. However, devs could be added to "allowed
senders" list, so this problem could be reduced.
At least, we could give it a try.
My 2 cents
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail addr
Am 02.04.2013 11:45, schrieb Bjoern Michaelsen:
Hi,
I cleaned up:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Main_Page
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA
a big +1
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice
With Moztrap filters it does not seem possible to get fine grained views
as unfortunately I was not able to tell the filter to use AND as operand
for the same criterion type (i.e. "tag"). It always seemed to use OR. So
tags do not provide enough "selection po
. Are they for the purpose of testing Moztrap itself?
I always try to work with the lowest possible rights. I've just got used
to do so since I've started to use linux a while ago.
Kind regards,
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Ma
pages feature (QA/xy...), it's a bit
difficult to organize a content based page hierarchy.
But we should try, at least IMHO.
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change sett
nnino3 -> Manager
So I can try to do some constructive pieces of work. I don't know how
far I will get - but thought I'll give it a try.
Thanks :-)
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.
Hi Sophie,
thanks for the quick answer :-)
further remarks/explanations:
Am 20.03.2013 14:46, schrieb Sophie Gautier:
On 20/03/2013 14:09, Nino Novak wrote:
Q1: Is it correct that Moztrap is ready and should be used for manual
testing? Is Litmus definitively obsolete? (there are several
not find a localized UI in Moztrap - is there a possibility to
localize it?
Q3: Is it planned to support localized bug tags?
Q4: What is tested automatically - and what needs to be tested manually?
Is there a list of all automatic tests? or at least a rough concept or
somesuch?
Thanks
Nino
it's not polite to ask others to do something but
I'd really like to see the "difference" of this week graphically.
Nino
unfortunately not being able to participate :-(
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoff
steigt die Sichtbarkeit deiner
Anfrage und damit Qualität der Antworten.
Gruß Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
possibility I see is to pass this proveniance
info to bugzilla registration and let it email you back a BSA link instead of an
FDO link with registration confirmation.
EasyHack?
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Li
Am 08.10.2012 19:43 schrieb Joel Madero:
> I just randomly did a pull on FDO of all bugs reported under LibO and saw that
> we've hit the 10,000 (exactly) number.
Sure?
Isn't it just the maximum number of bugs bugzilla lets you export in a normal
query?
;-)
Nino
AFAIR I cou
rkflow, no objections at first glance.)
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoff
to bring in his/her special attitude and
motivation. In the end, the sum will make the difference :-)
Nino
[1] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Talk:QA
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change
Please don't feel discouraged by my comments, I just
wanted to add a slightly different view. If people like your approach, that's
great! It does not contradict to mine (IMHO), as it's rather obvious if a bug
has been triaged or not. So we can all work together towards our common goal.
#x27;s also try to use bugzilla itself as much as possible
- we have also the wiki, but I do not see much advantage of using it compared to
a google spreadsheet as it does not support storing/handling structured data.
But it's a web, so we can document all processes nicely and link the documen
h.
> I'm still hoping the web team can help us move this away from google docs
> and get it automated a bit but for now, it is what it is.
I'm not sure to understand what you want to have automated, could you elaborate
just a little bit (or - if you have done so already - point me to the
Hi,
on 26.08.2012 22:44, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
>- send list of active wranglers (Rainer) (again?)
Where is this list? Is it a bugzilla query? Is it possible to create a
(monthly?) report/bar graph on "who reviewed how many bugs"?
Nino
___
ded to do, what you did, and what the
(intended/unintended) outcome was of every step. So we can address them one by
one. Thank you."
Regards,
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change
Hi,
On 20. Aug 2012 00:56, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> [...]
> The first goal of the QA team is [...]
nice statement :-)
I had the impulse to put it in a prominent place on the QA Homepage[1]. Feel
free to complete it or improve wording.
Nino
[1] http://wiki.documentfoundation.
is tested
autmatically - and what needs (additional) manual testing?
However - personally I'd say that QA needs as many qualified people as
possible, but that's not enough: the QA work needs better
coordination/synchronization, too.
Nino
_
Of course :-)
You might consider cc-ing (or fwd-ing) such blog announcements to the
documentation list as it is always difficult to collect 'human-readable'
info about new features.
Just a thought,
Nino
PS: crossposted to doc@global
___
List Na
you prioritize them?
Thanks,
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help
ld be achieved between a
requirement/use case/spec, a (or several) program function(s), and a set
of corresponding test cases.
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings:
On 22.05.2012 17:59, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
Nino schrieb:
Who is in charge of the list? Could you ban this "Groupon Urbano"
spammer?
Hi,
done! Thank you for the hint.
Thanks :-)
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Ma
sked gmane?
Thanks,
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-list
(or
delete it completely so I can retry to create it).
Thanks,
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? h
] http://www.openoffice.org/qa/
Regards, Nino
- conclusion: more liberal use of assigned should be ok if in status
"NEEDINFO" (only)
AA - send a proposal for liberal assigned use in NEEDINFO to Rainer for
review (Bjoern)
- change version "master" to release
n fix it and backport the fix
to 3.5.
My personal opinion: it IS annoying (but I don't need the function often, so
I'm not the right person to engage with the bug).
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail addre
On Wednesday 25 April 2012, 15:37:43 dE . wrote:
> File a bug, but probably this's a upstream problem.
done: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49139
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreo
procedures, but I'd really like to test Bjoerns hypothesis of community
empowerment ;-)
So, please, for meritocratic reasons, Bjoern and Rainer, I believe it's up to
you to decide. (Or is ESC or whatever tdf Board the right gremium? I don't
know)
Thanks,
Nino
PS - just one th
lly? And about how many bugs have been
reported in the 24-h-period in the past?
Thanks,
Nino
(just curious)
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.free
On Monday 23 April 2012, 12:38:40 Nino Novak wrote:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48329
another similar looking phenomenon:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48509
here, 2 times the same attachment upload in comments.
N
case, it's not a problem, but what if the document contained some
malware...
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoff
But the server returns 'Content-Type: text/plain', so this might be a problem.
Regards, Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mail
On Thursday 19 April 2012, 22:25:05 Cor Nouws wrote:
> Bug 48869 - Crash when dragging selected column to the left (edit)
Can't ALT+drag a column under KDE as this combo moves the whole window by
default.
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa
Hi,
the question emerged, if reassigning a NEEDINFO-bug to the presumed info
provider[1] is Good or Bad. Please advise.
Nino
[1]
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/index.php?title=BugTriage&diff=prev&oldid=42240
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa
Hi Christian,
On Friday 09 March 2012, 15:17:26 Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> it is the server that
> makes the decision whether there is an update, not LibreOffice.
> LibreOffice just displays the server's response.
ah, ok, I see!
thanks for clarification
3.5.2 (final!) update is
available.
(So the test is "not passed" in my eyes)
Or does the notifyer behave different in RCs? (If so, it's not an RC!)
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@list
Hi Bjoern, all,
On Wednesday 07 March 2012, 12:48:25 Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 08:42:10AM +0100, Nino Novak wrote:
> > [test case tagging]
>
> Noted.
Thanks :-)
> We will discuss that on the call.
If time allows, fine.
But on the call you shou
On Wednesday 07 March 2012, 08:42:10 Nino Novak wrote:
> Some ideas/wishes/comments from an interested layman:
just an additional thought:
is there a possibility to define certain "test paths"? Mean, some kind of
"sophisticated" test case which - if passed - "c
later on international level, so the learning
curve / barrier can be kept smooth.
An additional (possibly somewhat crazy) idea: To gather test cases from the
community by asking "What functionality do *you* want to be tested? Provide a
well-thought-out testcase for your perso
everybody subscribes to a different
- individual - set).
Thanks,
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems?
nd have so in past).
(I believe, that many many people do such "personal silent testing" without
anybody knowing how many tests were performed on what platform and with which
kind of documents)
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffic
On Thursday 16 February 2012, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Nino Novak píše v Čt 16. 02. 2012 v 02:01 +0100:
> > [Transclusion]
>
> Sounds wonderful! I was not aware of such feature.
oh, there are still many "unused wiki features" left ;-)
> > For conveniance, I&#x
Hi Bjoern,
could you provide a md5sum of the tar package?
I'm on slow internet and after downloading more than 7 hours I get
nino@chef:~/liboqa/Material/bibisect> tar --lzma -xf bibisect-3.5.tar.lzma
lzma: (stdin): File format not recognized
tar: Child returned status 1
tar: Erro
een proved to work)
For conveniance, I've attached a patch, hopefully it works ;-)
Thanks,
Nino
[1] http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria--- Release_Criteria.txt 2012-02-16 01:35:03.256719428 +0100
+++ Release_Criteria-modified.txt 2012-02-16 01:45:51.616725867 +0100
BuildID: iwohm-noinaog-nzorioinoih-mfowiom
However you decide - any chance to have the same strings returned also when
invoking "libreoffice --version" cli command? (consistency ...)
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mail
ntiate. But this would end up in something like
PersonX(12/3/23/8)
which I'd consider rather ugly.
my 2 ¢
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freede
for wiki contributions, so
what if we start with the number of reported bugs in a first approximation?
(In my eyes, not only the count but also the "value" of a contribution should
count, but how to define the value? So, the count should be a good start)
Nino
___
Am Freitag, 27. Januar 2012, 16:17:25 schrieb Cor Nouws:
> Hi Nino,
>
> Nino Novak wrote (27-01-12 15:09)
>
> > Personally I have the impression / concern that Quality is getting one
> > of the main challenges of LibreOffice as it seems to decrease more and
> > m
Am Samstag, 28. Januar 2012, 14:14:15 schrieb Luc Castermans:
> Op 27-01-12 16:17, Cor Nouws schreef:
> > Hi Nino,
> >
> > Nino Novak wrote (27-01-12 15:09)
> >
> >> Personally I have the impression / concern that Quality is getting one
> >> of the
ext file. But I really don't
know if this is a good subject to talk about at FOSDEM.
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listi
ttps connections...). It only works if all components
collaborate smoothly, so in my eyes, there are several places where problems
or timeouts could occur.
Maybe looking into the server logs might give more information? Maybe the
occurence frequency could also b
Hi,
please keep in mind that I'm by no means a QA expert, but sometimes I'm good
in expressing thoughts and fears of ordinary people ;-)
On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 09:58:48 AM Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 16:20 +0100, Nino Novak wrote:
>
> ...
>
&g
s what
came to my mind :-)
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-l
Hi Rainer,
Am Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2012, 15:22:41 schrieb Rainer Bielefeld:
> I started a new QA-Team Page [2]
why didn't you just update the existing page? (just wondering - so we now have
two pages, and nobody will know which is the actual one
80 matches
Mail list logo
