Hi all
The most frequent questions from people providing help in the User mailing
list and in the Bug tracker is: "What is your OS architecture?", "Are you
using the 32 bit version of LibreOffice ?"
Isn't it possible that this information is included in the About dialog?
In addition to
Version
@Pedro, *
Pedro wrote
> The most frequent questions from people providing help in the User mailing
> list and in the Bug tracker is: "What is your OS architecture?", "Are you
> using the 32 bit version of LibreOffice ?"
>
> Isn't it possible that this information is included in the About dialog?
Hi Stuart, all
V Stuart Foote wrote
> And, when the 64-bit build of LibreOffice is installed, it is already
> labeled (x64), as in this example:
>
> Version: 5.1.1.2 (x64)
> Build ID: fe4d9e69c82c6ee6db3c27cd5e2d47558afa80ac
> CPU Threads: 8; OS Version: Windows 6.29; UI Render: default;
> Loca
See this MSDN note:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms724832%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/More-information-in-About-dialog-tp4177879p4177892.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
V Stuart Foote wrote
> See this MSDN note:
>
> https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms724832%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
Ok. So LibreOffice is not getting the Windows version correctly.
In fact, if I open a command window I get "Microsoft Windows [Version
10.0.10586]" which makes sense
Hi,
I had mentioned the issue to Meeks last week and he said "Oh - so; those
numbers have to go through a mapping table to be human
readable. And - worse - they are now trying hard not to expose windows
version information in their new APIs."
On 03/08/2016 03:13 AM, Pedro wrote:
V Stuart Foot
Pedro wrote:
Hi all
The most frequent questions from people providing help in the User mailing
list and in the Bug tracker is: "What is your OS architecture?", "Are you
using the 32 bit version of LibreOffice ?"
Isn't it possible that this information is included in the About dialog?
In additi
Hi Tommy
Tommy wrote
> Version: 5.2.0.0.alpha0+
> Build ID: f64a190f52f9e9c76c2a0d18f072938b5df93aae
> CPU Threads: 4; OS Version: Windows 6.29; UI Render: default;
> TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2016-02-28_14:15:03
> Locale: it-IT (it_IT)
>
> but I think it would be easier to see
2016-03-07 18:47 GMT+01:00 Pedro :
> Hi all
>
> The most frequent questions from people providing help in the User mailing
> list and in the Bug tracker is: "What is your OS architecture?", "Are you
> using the 32 bit version of LibreOffice ?"
>
> Isn't it possible that this information is include
Hi Henri
mhenriday wrote
> Version: 5.1.1.2
> Build ID: 1:5.1.1~rc2-0ubuntu1~trusty0
> CPU-trådar: 4; Version av operativsystem: Linux 4.2; UI-rendering:
> standard;
> Språkinställning: sv-SE (sv_SE.UTF-8)
>
> but no information on whether the version I have installed is, in fact,
> 32-bit or 64
2
016-03-11 13:00 GMT+01:00 Pedro :
> Hi Henri
>
> mhenriday wrote
> > Version: 5.1.1.2
> > Build ID: 1:5.1.1~rc2-0ubuntu1~trusty0
> > CPU-trådar: 4; Version av operativsystem: Linux 4.2; UI-rendering:
> > standard;
> > Språkinställning: sv-SE (sv_SE.UTF-8)
> >
> > but no information on whether
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:16:14PM +0100, M Henri Day wrote:
>Thanks for your speedy reply, Pedro ! My Linux Mint 17.3-version is, on
>the contrary, a 64-bit version, which I could confirm by running uname -a
>in a terminal, as seen below :
>
>Linux XX 4.2.0-
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:16:14PM +0100, M Henri Day wrote:
> Assuming that the logic that Stuart mentioned for LibreOffice under
> Windows
> also applies to Linux (it should) then since your LibreOffice reports
> "Version: 5.1.1.2" it is the 32bit (x86) version (otherwise it w
2016-03-11 14:28 GMT+01:00 Rene Engelhard :
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:16:14PM +0100, M Henri Day wrote:
> >Thanks for your speedy reply, Pedro ! My Linux Mint 17.3-version
> is, on
> >the contrary, a 64-bit version, which I could confirm by running
> uname -a
> >in a termi
mhenriday wrote
> I'd still like to know how to confirm that the same is true of the
> LibO version I have installed
Suspect a terminal session with cd to the LibreOffice installation and
running "file soffice" would suffice.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundatio
Rene Engelhard wrote
>> Assuming that the logic that Stuart mentioned for LibreOffice under
>> Windows
>> also applies to Linux (it should) then since your LibreOffice
>> reports
>> "Version: 5.1.1.2" it is the 32bit (x86) version (otherwise it would
>> say
>> "Version: 5.1
2016-03-11 15:05 GMT+01:00 V Stuart Foote :
> mhenriday wrote
> > I'd still like to know how to confirm that the same is true of the
> > LibO version I have installed
>
> Suspect a terminal session with cd to the LibreOffice installation and
> running "file soffice" would suffice.
>
Thanks,
On Mon, 2016-03-07 at 10:47 -0700, Pedro wrote:
> The most frequent questions from people providing help in the User mailing
> list and in the Bug tracker is: "What is your OS architecture?", "Are you
> using the 32 bit version of LibreOffice ?"
Originally I was rather nervous about exten
Pedro wrote
> It couldn't be simple and consistent, could it?
Actually, I had thought the (x64) was being applied to info "About" dialog
for all builds =)
But perusing the code showed it had only been done to distinguish the 64-bit
Windows builds. [1] Hmm, maybe I need to spend more time in Li
Hi Stuart, all
V Stuart Foote wrote
> Anyhow, Michael M.'s suggested easy hack looks to provide hooks for a
> consistent indicator on all build platforms. Any takers?
Code is a foreign incomprehensible language to me, but as far as I can tell,
Michael is referring to "GetHWOSConfInfo" which I a
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 09:52:15AM -0700, V Stuart Foote wrote:
> But perusing the code showed it had only been done to distinguish the 64-bit
> Windows builds. [1] Hmm, maybe I need to spend more time in Linux sessions.
>
> Anyhow, Michael M.'s suggested easy hack looks to provide hooks for
21 matches
Mail list logo
